Extending Construal-Level Theory to Distributed Groups: Understanding the Effects of Virtuality

References

• Amin A, Cohendet P. (2004) Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baba ML, Gluesing J, Ratner H, Wagner KH. (2004) The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. J. Organ. Behav. 25 :547–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell BS, Kozlowski S. (2002) A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group Organ. Management 27 :14–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau MC, Robey D. (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16 :3–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Swap WC. (1976) Effects of repeated exposure on interpersonal attraction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 33 :531–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi H-S, Thompson L. (2005) Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 98 :121–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coshall J, Potter R. (1987) Social psychological variations in the distance cognitions of urban consumers in Britain. J. Soc. Psych. 127 :611–625.Google Scholar
• Cramton CD. (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12 :346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD, Hinds PJ. (2005) Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? , Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 (Elsevier, New York), 233–265.Google Scholar
• Cummings JN, Espinosa JA, Pickering CK. (2009) Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Inform. Systems Res. 20 :420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH. (1984) Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. , Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 191–233.Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Marquis C. (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16 :332–343.Link, Google Scholar
• Derryberry D, Reed MA. (1998) Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality Individual Differences 25 :745–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50 :25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD. (2007) Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. J. Management Inform. Systems 24 :135–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flowers ML. (1977) A laboratory test of some implications of Janis' groupthink hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35 :888–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Förster J, Friedman RS, Liberman N. (2004) Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87 :177–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Henderson MD, Eng J, Trope Y, Liberman N. (2006) Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psych. Sci. 17 :278–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J. (1993) Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. 36 :921–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Malone PS. (1995) The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. 117 :21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Gibbs JL, Stanko TL, Tesluk P, Cohen SG. (2011) Including the “I” in virtuality and modern job design: Extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experience of electronic dependence and copresence. Organ. Sci. 22 :1481–1499.Link, Google Scholar
• Griffith TL, Sawyer JE, Neale MA. (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals and information technology. MIS Quart. 27 :265–285.Google Scholar
• Harrison D, Price KH, Bell MP. (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface and deep level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. 41 :96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedstrom P, Swedberg R. (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson MD. (2009) Psychological distance and group judgments: The effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull 35 :1330–1341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson MD, Fujita K, Trope Y, Liberman N. (2006) Transcending the “here”: The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91 :845–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G, Konradt U, Orlikowski B. (2004) Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence and team-based rewards in virtual teams. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 13 :1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Bailey DE. (2003) Out of sight out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed groups. Organ. Sci. 14 :615–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Cramton CD. (2008) Situated Knowing Who: Why Site Visits Matter in Global Work. (Stanford University, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M. (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16 :290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Idson LC, Miscel W. (2001) The personality of familiar and significant people: The lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80 :585–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D. (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56 :517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE. (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10 :791–815.Link, Google Scholar
• Jia L, Hirt ER, Karpen SC. (2009) Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45 :1127–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones EE, Nisbett RE. (1971) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , Jones EE, Kanouse DE, Kelley HH, Nisbett RE, Valins S, Weiner B, eds. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ), 79–94.Google Scholar
• Kivetz Y, Tyler TR. (2007) Tomorrow I'll be me: The effects of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102 :193–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lea MT, Spears R. (1992) Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. J. Organ. Comput. 2 :321–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy SR, Freitas A, Salovey P. (2002) Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications for perceiving homogeneity among but also empathizing with and helping others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83 :1224–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y. (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75 :5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y. (2008) The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 322 :1201–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Sagristano MD, Trope Y. (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38 :523–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsley DH, Brass DJ, Thomas JB. (1995) Efficacy performance spirals: AQ multi-level perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 20 :645–678.Google Scholar
• Liviatan I, Trope Y, Liberman N. (2008) Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perceptions of others' actions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44 :1256–1269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, Richard J. (2005) Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. 16 :9–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba S. (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported interorganizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24 :569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Cummings L, Chervany N. (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23 :473–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Neeley T. (2012) Reflected knowledge and trust in global collaboration. Management Sci. 58 (12):2207–2224.Link, Google Scholar
• Mullen B, Copper C. (1994) The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psych. Bull. 115 :210–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nussbaum S, Trope Y, Liberman N. (2003) Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84 :485–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Leary MB. (2010) Virtual by choice: An interaction control theory of deliberate distancing via mediated communication. Presentation at the Academy of Management Conference, August 6–10 , Montreal.Google Scholar
• O'Leary MB, Cummings JN. (2007) The spatial, temporal and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. 31 :433–452.Google Scholar
• O'Leary MB, Mortensen M. (2010) Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21 :115–131.Link, Google Scholar
• O'Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley A. (2011) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36 :461–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson GM, Olson JS. (2000) Distance matters. Human Comput. Interaction 15 :139–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom TM, Sedikides C. (1992) Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psych. Bull. 112 :536–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto MB, Pinto JK, Prescott JE. (1993) Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. 39 :1281–1297.Link, Google Scholar
• Polzer JT, Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL, Kim JW. (2006) Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. 49 :679–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raghuram S, Tuertscher P, Garud R. (2010) Mapping the field of virtual work: A cocitation analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 21 :1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Randel AE, Jaussi KS. (2003) Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management J. 46 :763–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutkowski A-F, Saunders C, Vogel D, van Genuchten M. (2007) “Is it already 4 a.m. in your time zone?” Focus immersion and temporal dissociation in virtual teams. Small Group Res. 38 :98–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiller SZ, Mandviwalla M. (2007) Virtual team research: Analysis of theory use and a framework for theory appropriation. Small Group Res. 38 :12–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Trope Y. (2006) You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90 :578–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L, Kiesler S. (1986) Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. 32 :1492–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Staples DS, Hulland JS, Higgins CA. (1999) A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. 10 :758–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Staw B. (1975) Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 13 :414–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas D, Bostrom R. (2008) Building trust and cooperation through technology adaptation in virtual teams: Empirical field evidence. Inform. Systems Management 25 :45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. (2000) Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79 :876–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110 :403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117 :440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C. (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 17 :83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakslak CJ, Nussbaum S, Liberman N, Trope Y. (2008) Representations of the self in the near and distant future. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95 :757–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakslak CJ, Trope Y, Liberman N, Alony R. (2006) Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 135 :641–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB. (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Comm. Res. 19 :52–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB, Bazarova NN. (2008) Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Comm. Res. 35 :622–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB, Anderson JF, Park DW. (1994) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Comm. Res. 21 :460–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB, Slovacek CL, Tidwell LC. (2001) Is a picture worth a thousand words? Comm. Res. 28 :105–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J, Staples DS. (2006) Comparing virtual teams to traditional teams: An identification of new research opportunities. , Martocchio JJ, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 181–215.Google Scholar
• Weisband S. (2008) Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York).Google Scholar
• Weisband S, Atwater L. (1999) Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. J. Appl. Psych. 84 :632–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisband S, Thatcher SMB, Xu J. (2005) Using bibliometric analysis to evaluate scientific progress in virtual teams research. Presentation at the Academy of Management Conference, August 5–10 , Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
• Whetten DA, Felin T, King BG. (2009) The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. J. Management 35 :537–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson J. (2001) The development of trust in distributed groups. . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Wilson JM, Straus SG, McEvily WJ. (2006) All in due time: The development of trust in electronic and face-to-face groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99 :16–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson JM, O'Leary M, Metiu A, Jett Q. (2008) Perceptions of proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organ. Stud. 29 :979–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S. (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18 :749–762.Link, Google Scholar