Double Victimization in the Workplace: Why Observers Condemn Passive Victims of Sexual Harassment

References

• Andersson LM, Pearson CM. (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 24 :452–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch SE. (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. , Guetzkow H, ed. Groups, Leadership, and Men: Research in Human Relations (Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh), 177–190.Google Scholar
• Baker DD, Terpstra DE, Larntz K. (1990) The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles 22 :305–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balcetis E, Dunning DA. (2008) A mile in moccasins: How situational experience diminishes dispositionism in social inference. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34 :102–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Early S, Salvarani G. (1997) Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23 :751–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117 :497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Stillwell A, Wotman SR. (1990) Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. J. Personality Soc. Psych 59 :994–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergman ME, Langhout RD, Palmieri PA, Cortina LM, Fitzgerald LF. (2002) The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psych. 87 :230–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buehler R, Griffin D, MacDonald H. (1997) The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull 23 :238–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M. (1994) Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67 :366–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colatosti C, Karg E. (1992) Stopping Sexual Harassment: A Handbook for Union and Workplace Activists (Labor Education and Research Project, Detroit).Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Magley VJ. (2003) Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. J. Occupational Health Psych. 8 :247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Wasti SA. (2005) Profiles in coping: Responses to sexual harassment across persons, organizations, and cultures. J. Appl. Psych. 90 :182–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crull P. (1982) Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling. Amer. J. Orthopsychiatry 52 :539–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MH. (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence from a multidimensional approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44 :113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Judicibus M, McCabe MP. (2001) Blaming the target of sexual harassment: Impact of gender role, sexist attitudes, and work role. Sex Roles 44 :401–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann KA, Tenbrunsel AE, Galinsky AD. (2003) From self-prediction to self-defeat: Behavioral forecasting, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the effect of competitive expectations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85 :672–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Pagon M. (2002) Social undermining in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 45 :331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Dunning D. (2000) Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79 :861–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Dunning D. (2006) The mixed blessings of self-knowledge in behavioral predictions: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32 :641–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faley RH, Knapp DE, Kustis GA, Dubois CLZ. (1999) Estimating the organizational costs of sexual harassment: The case of the U.S. Army. J. Bus. Psych. 13 :461–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Swan S, Fischer K. (1995) Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. J. Soc. Issues 51 :117–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Swan S, Magley VJ. (1997) But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. , O'Donohue W, ed. Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), 5–28.Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F, Hulin CL, Gelfand MJ, Magley VJ. (1997) Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. J. Appl. Psych. 82 :578–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Shullman S, Bailey N, Richards M, Swecker J, Gold Y, Ormerod M, Weitzman C. (1988) The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. J. Vocational Behav. 32 :152–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentile MC. (2010) Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What's Right (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Malone PS. (1995) The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. 117 :21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Kerr M, Medvec VH. (1993) Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64 :552–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glomb TM, Munson LJ, Hulin CL, Bergman ME, Drasgow F. (1999) Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. J. Appl. Psych. 84 :14–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM. (1999) Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Amer. Psych. 54 :493–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38 :69–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin DW, Dunning D, Ross L. (1990) The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59 :1128–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber JE. (1989) How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review. Sociol. Soc. Res. 4 :3–9.Google Scholar
• Gruber JE, Bjorn L. (1982) Blue-collar blues: The sexual harassment of women autoworkers. Work Occupations 9 :271–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutek BA. (1985) Sex and the Workplace: Impact of Sexual Behavior and Harassment on Women, Men, and Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Gutek BA, Koss MP. (1993) Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. J. Vocational Behav. 42 :28–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones EE, Davis KE. (1965) From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. , Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York), 220–266.Google Scholar
• Kenig S, Ryan J. (1986) Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles 15 :535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knapp DE, Faley RH, Ekeberg SE, Dubois CLZ. (1997) Determinants of target responses to sexual harassment: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 22 :687–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall ML. (1995) Sexual harassment research: A methodological critique. Personnel Psych. 48 :155–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT. (2000) An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, the relationships, and work outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 85 :407–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonsway KA, Cortina LM, Magley VJ. (2008) Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles 58 :599–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melwani S, Barsade SG. (2011) Held in contempt: The psychological, interpersonal, and performance consequences of contempt in a work context. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101 :503–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S. (1974) Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Munson LJ, Hulin CL, Drasgow F. (2000) Longitudinal analysis of dispositional influences and sexual harassment: Effects on job and psychological outcomes. Personnel Psych. 53 :21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray-Law B. (2011) Retraining the biased brain: Is it possible to break people of unconscious prejudice? One researcher's work suggests it is. Monitor Psych. 42 :42–43.Google Scholar
• Neuman JH, Baron RA. (1998) Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. J. Management 24 :391–419.Google Scholar
• Newby-Clark IR, Ross M, Buehler R, Koehler DJ, Griffin D. (2000) People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. 6 :171–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson DW, Rogers T. (2010) Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psych. Sci. 21 :194–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Leary-Kelly AM, Paetzold RL, Griffin RW. (2000) Sexual harassment as aggressive behavior: An actor-based perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 25 :372–388.Google Scholar
• Osberg TM, Shrauger JS. (1986) Self-prediction: Exploring the parameters of accuracy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51 :1044–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearson CM, Andersson LM, Wegner JW. (2001) When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations 54 :1387–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry EL, Kulik CT, Field MP. (2009) Sexual harassment training: Recommendations to address gaps between the practitioner and research literatures. Human Resource Management 48 :817–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry EL, Kulik CT, Schmidtke JM. (1997) Blowing the whistle: Determinants of responses to sexual harassment. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 19 :457–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. (2010) Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Acad. Management Perspect. 24 :34–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rook KC. (1992) Detrimental aspects of social relationships: Taking stock of an emerging literature. , Veil H, Baumann U, eds. The Meaning and Measurement of Social Support (Hemisphere, New York), 157–169.Google Scholar
• Ross L. (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. , Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 (Academic Press, New York), 174–221.Google Scholar
• Sbraga TP, O'Donohue W. (2000) Sexual harassment. Annual Rev. Sex Res. 11 :258–286.Google Scholar
• Schneider KT, Swan S, Fitzgerald LF. (1997) Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 82 :401–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman SJ. (1980) On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39 :211–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smirles KE. (2004) Attributions of responsibility in cases of sexual harassment: The person and the situation. J. Appl. Soc. Psych 34 :342–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storms MD. (1973) Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 27 :165–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swim JK, Hyers LL. (1999) Excuse me—What did you just say?! Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35 :68–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Diekmann KA, Wade-Benzoni KA, Bazerman MH. (2010) The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we aren't as ethical as we think we are. Res. Organ. Behav. 30 :153–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. (2000) Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79 :876–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110 :403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine-French S, Radtke HL. (1989) Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting. Sex Roles 21 :545–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallone RP, Griffin DW, Lin S, Ross L. (1990) Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58 :582–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G. (2005) Cross-situational projection. , Alicke MD, Dunning DA, Krueger J, eds. The Self in Social Judgment (Psychology Press, New York), 43–64.Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Dunning D, Loewenstein G. (2000) Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperception of the endowment effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79 :66–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Loewenstein G, Dunning D. (2005) The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96 :130–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vinokur AD, van Ryn M. (1993) Social support and undermining in close relationships: Their independent effects on the mental health of unemployed persons. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65 :350–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willness CR, Steel P, Lee K. (2007) A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psych. 60 :128–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodzicka JA, LaFrance M. (2001) Real versus imagined gender harassment. J. Soc. Issues 57 :15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar