Information Technology, Productivity, and Asset Ownership: Evidence from Taxicab Fleets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0758

References

  • Argyres NS, Zenger TR. (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Autor D, Dorn D. (2012) Inequality and specialization: The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. . NBER Working Paper 15150, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Baker GP, Hubbard TN. (2004) Contractibility and asset ownership: On-board computers and governance in U.S. trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4):1443–1479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J. (2009) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. . NBER Working Paper 14975, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM. (2002) Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E. (1994) Information assets, technology and organization. Management Sci. 40(12):1645–1662.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bruno R. (2010) Driven into poverty: A comprehensive study of the Chicago taxicab industry. . Working paper, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Card D, DiNardo J. (2006) The impact of technological change on low-wage workers: A review. , Blank RM, Danziger SH, Schoeni RF, eds. Working and Poor: How Economic and Policy Changes Are Affecting Low-Wage Workers (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 113–140.Google Scholar
  • Coase R. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H. (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
  • Gallaugher JM. (2008) Zara case: Fast fashion from savvy systems. . Case study, Boston College, Boston. http://www.gallaugher.com/Zara%20Case.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Gilbert G, Nalevanko A, Stone JR. (1993) Computer dispatch and scheduling in the taxi and paratransit industries: An application of advanced public transportation systems. . Working paper, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
  • Gilbert G, Cook TJ, Nalevanko A, Everett-Lee L. (2002) The role of the private-for-hire vehicle industry in public transit. . Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 75, Transportation Research Board/National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Grossman S, Hart O. (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA. (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O, Moore J. (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens G. (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(1):4–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Hitt LM. (2005) Losing sight of the forest for the trees? Productive capabilities and gains from trade as drivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management J. 26(13):1209–1227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Winter SG. (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lafontaine F, Slade M. (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature 45(3):629–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois R. (1992) Transaction cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):99–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Wu X. (2010) Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macher JT, Richman BD. (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1):1–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahr F, Kretschmer T. (2010) Complementarities between personal computing and organizational structure: The role of corporate exploration and exploitation. . Working paper, Ludwig Maximillians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Silverman BS. (2003) Why aren’t all truck drivers owner-operators? Asset ownership and the employment relation in interstate for-hire trucking. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):91–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rawley E, Simcoe T. (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 57(11):1963–1978.Google Scholar
  • Rochlin GI. (1997) Trapped in the Net: The Unanticipated Consequences of Computerization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaller B, Gilbert G. (1995) Factors of production in a regulated industry: New York taxi drivers and the price for better service. Transportation Quart. 49(4):81–91.Google Scholar
  • Taxicab, Limousine, and Paratransit Association (1992–1997a) TLPA Limousine and Sedan Fact Book (International Taxicab Association, Kensington, MD).Google Scholar
  • Taxicab, Limousine, and Paratransit Association (1992–1997b) TLPA Taxicab Fact Book (International Taxicab Association, Kensington, MD).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Woollett K, Spiers HJ, Maguire EA. (2009) Talent in the taxi: A model system for exploring expertise. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 364(1522):1407–1416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.