Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of Relationship Focus

References

• Abrams D, Wetherell M, Cochrane S, Hogg MA, Turner JC. (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British J. Soc. Psych. 29(Part 2):97–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonio AL, Chang MJ, Hakuta K, Kenny DA, Levin S, Milem JF. (2004) Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psych. Sci. 15(8):507–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Conner TL. (1974) Performance expectations and behavior in small groups: A revised formulation. , Berger J, Conner ML, Fisek MH, eds. Expectations States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program (Winthrop, Cambridge, MA), 85–109.Google Scholar
• Brewer MB. (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. 86(2):307–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Miller N. (1996) Intergroup Relations (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).Google Scholar
• Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzish A, Frey D, Schulz-Hardt S. (2002) The dissemination of crtitical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 32(1):35–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen FF, Kenrick DT. (2002) Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Shechter D, Chaiken S. (1996) Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- vs. impression-motivated heuristic and systematic information processing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(2):262–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cosier RA, Schwenk CR. (1990) Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions. Acad. Management Executive 4(1):69–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crott HW, Giesel M, Hoffmann C. (1998) The process of inductive inference in groups: The use of positive and negative hypothesis and target testing in sequential rule-discovery tasks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(4):938–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doosje B, Spears R, Ellemers N. (2002) Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British J. Soc. Psych. 41(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fry WR, Firestone IJ, Williams DL. (1983) Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: Do lovers lose? Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 4(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Gardner WL. (1999) Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(3):642–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner WL, Gabriel S, Lee AY. (1999) “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psych. Sci. 10(4):321–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. (2001) From accumulation to accommodation: The chemistry of collective cognition in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Vermeulen F. (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams K, Neale MA. (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ. (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW. (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Oppes T, Svensson A. (2002) “It’s OK if we say it, but you can’t”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 32(3):293–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Tingley D, Yamamoto T. (2012) Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 176(Part 1):5–51.Google Scholar
• Jackson SE. (1992) Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. , Shrivastava P, Huff A, Dutton J, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 345–382.Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL. (2003) Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Management 29(6):801–830.Google Scholar
• Janis IL. (1972) Victims of Groupthink (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Janis IL. (1982) Counteracting the adverse effects of concurrence-seeking in policy-planning groups: Theory and research perspectives. , Brandstatter H, Davis JH, Stocker-Kreichgauer G, eds. Group Decision Making (Academic Press, New York), 477–502.Google Scholar
• Janis IL, Mann L. (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Jehn KA. (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):256–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Shah P. (1997) Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(4):775–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA. (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane AA. (2010) Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ. Sci. 21(3):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM. (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, Tindale RS. (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:623–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lount RB, Phillips KW. (2007) Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):214–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhtanen R, Crocker J. (1992) A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personal Soc. Psych. Bull. 18(3):302–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix EA, Neale MA. (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matz DC, Wood W. (2005) Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(1):22–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLeod PL, Lobel SA, Cox TH. (1996) Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Res. 27(2):248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miliken FJ, Martins LL. (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):402–433.Google Scholar
• Moreland RL. (2010) Are dyads really groups? Small Group Res. 41(2):251–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moscovici S. (1985) Social influence and conformity. , Lindzey G, Aronson E, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York), 347–412.Google Scholar
• O’Connor KM, Arnold JA. (2011) Sabotaging the deal: The way relational concerns undermine negotiations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(6):1167–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP. (1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J. (2001) Direct and indirect effects. Proc. 17th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 411–420.Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, van der Laab MJ. (2006) Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology 17(3):276–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Lount RB. (2010) Looking down and ramping up: The impact of status differences on effort in intergroup contexts. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(1):9–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Harkins S, Williams K. (1980) The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW. (2003) The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Apfelbaum EA. (2012) Delusions of homogeneity? Reinterpreting the effects of group diversity. , Mannix EA, Neale MA, eds. Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 15) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL. (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Liljenquist K, Neale MA. (2009) Is the pain worth the gain? The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35(3):336–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Northcraft GB, Neale MA. (2006) Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(4):467–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH. (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(4):497–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. (2008) Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. , Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB, eds. The Sage Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 13–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richman LS, Leary M. (2009) Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psych. Rev. 116(2):365–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Berger J. (1986) Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(5):603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin M, Hewstone M. (1998) Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personal Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(1):40–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachdev I, Bourhis R. (1987) Status differentials and intergroup behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 17(3):277–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J. (2002) Protestant relational ideology and in attention to relational cues in work settings. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(4):919–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J. (2005) Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. , Kramer R, Staw B, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 265–305.Google Scholar
• Saunders C, Jones JW. (1990) Temporal sequences in information acquisition for decision making: A focus on source and medium. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):29–46.Google Scholar
• Shah PP, Jehn KA. (1993) Do friends perform better than acquaintances?: The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision Negotiation 2(2):149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N. (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons TL, Peterson RS. (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):102–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sniezek JA, Henry RA. (1989) Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process 43(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommers SR. (2006) On racial diversity and group decision-making: Identifying multiple effects of racial diversity on jury deliberations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(4):597–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommers SR, Warp LS, Mahoney CC. (2008) Cognitive effects of racial diversity: White individuals’ information processing in heterogeneous groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44(4):1129–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Fong GT. (2005) Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Stewart D. (1992) Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(3):426–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. , Worchel S, Austin LW, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relation (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Tasa K, Whyte G. (2005) Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):119–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor HF. (1968) Balance, tension, and tension release in the two-person group. Human Relations 21(1):59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Phillips KW. (2004) When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(12):1585–1598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hunt MC, Ogden TY, Neale MA. (2003) Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. 49(4):464–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Turner ME, Pratkanis AR. (1998) A social identity maintenance model of groupthink. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 73(2/3):210–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher S, Wetherell MS. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL. (2001) Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 4(3):207–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ. (2009) Mediation and mechanism. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 24(5):217–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Vliert E, De Dreu CKW. (1994) Optimizing performance by conflict simulation. Internat. J. Conflict Management 5(3):211–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC. (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams K, O’Reilly CA. (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. , Staw BM, Sutton RI, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
• Williams S, Taormina RJ. (1993) Unanimous versus majority influences on group polarization in business decision making. J. Soc. Psych. 133(2):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR, Lawrence BS. (1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. 32(2):353–376.Crossref, Google Scholar