In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization

References

• Abelson RP. (1964) Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. , Frederiksen N, Gulliksen H, eds. Contributions to Mathematical Psychology (Holt, Rinehart Winston, New York), 142–160.Google Scholar
• Abrams D, Wetherell M, Cochrane S, Hogg MA, Turner JC. (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are—Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British J. Soc. Psych. 29(2):97–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Polos L, Ryall M, Sorenson O. (2009) Introduction to special topic forum. The case for formal theory. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):201–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacharach SB, Bamberger PA, Vashdi D. (2005) Diversity and homophily at work: Supportive relations among white and African-American peers. Acad. Management J. 48(4):619–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bezrukova K, Jehn KA, Zanutto EL, Thatcher SMB. (2009) Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):35–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowers CA, Pharmer JA, Salas E. (2000) When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. A meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 31(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown GDA, Chater N. (2001) The chronological organization of memory: Common psychological foundations for remembering and timing. , Hoerl C, McCormack T, eds. Time and Memory: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 77–110.Google Scholar
• Byrne D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Colson E. (1954) Social control and vengeance in plateau Tonga society. Africa: J. Internat. African Inst. 23(3):199–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan N. (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24(1):87–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard EE. (1939) Introduction. , Peristiany JG, ed. The Social Institutions of the Kipsigis (Routledge, London), XIX–XXXIV.Google Scholar
• Flache A, Mäs M. (2008a) How to get the timing right? A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 14(1):23–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flache A, Mäs M. (2008b) Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion. Simulation Model. Practice Theory 16(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flap H. (1988) Conflict, Loyalty and Violence: The Effects of Social Networks on Behaviour (Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Fahrbach K. (1999) Organization culture as a complex system: Balance and information in models of influence and selection. Organ. Sci. 10(3):253–277.Link, Google Scholar
• French JRP. (1956) A formal theory of social power. Psych. Rev. 63(3):181–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galtung J. (1966) Rank and social integration: A multidimensional appraoch. , Berger J, Zelditch M, Anderson B, eds. Sociological Theories in Progress (Houghton Mifflin, Boston), 145–198.Google Scholar
• Harary F. (1959) A criterion for unanimity in French’s theory of social power. , Cartwright D, ed. Studies in Social Power (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI), 168–182.Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM. (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1229–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT. (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1029–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F. (1967) Attitudes and cognitive organization. , Fishbein M, ed. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 39–41.Google Scholar
• Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW. (2007) Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups. Group Dynam. Theory Res. Practice 11(2):79–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. (1992) Homophily and differential returns—Sex-differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isenberg DJ. (1986) Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(6):1141–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA. (1994) Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Internat. J. Conflict Management 5(3):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Bendersky C. (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:187–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Bezrukova K. (2010) The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 112(1):24–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamada T, Kawai S. (1989) An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inform. Processing Lett. 31(1):7–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel DB. (1978) Homophily, selction, and socialization in adolescent friendships. Amer. J. Sociol. 84(2):427–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK. (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):325–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK. (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. 48(4):645–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK. (1954) Friendship and social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. , Berger M, Abel T, Page CH, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (Van Nostrand, New York), 18–66.Google Scholar
• Lijphart A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Macy MW, Willer R. (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28(1):143–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFarland D, Bender-deMoll S. (2007) SoNIA (Social Network Image Animator). . Accessed May 28, 2010, http://www.stanford.edu/group/sonia.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L. (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations—Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA. (1956) The magical number 7, plus or minus 2—Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Martins LL. (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management J. 21(2):402–433.Google Scholar
• Molleman E. (2005) Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decision Negotiation 14(3):173–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody J. (2001) Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(3):679–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers DG. (1982) Polarizing effects of social interaction. , Brandstätter H, Davis JH, Stocker-Kreichgauer G, eds. Group Decision Making (Academic Press, London), 125–161.Google Scholar
• Myers DG, Lamm H. (1976) The group polarization phenomenon. Psych. Bull. 83(4):602–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nieuwbeerta P, Flap H. (2000) Crosscutting social circles and political choice—Effects of personal network composition on voting behavior in the Netherlands. Soc. Networks 22(4):313–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh HS, Chung MH, Labianca G. (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. 47(6):860–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH. (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organ. Sci. 7(6):615–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW. (2003) The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH. (2004) Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(4):497–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rink F, Jehn KA. (2010) Divided we fall, or united we stand? How identity processes affect faultline perceptions and the functioning of diverse teams. , Crisp RJ, ed. The Psychology of Social and Cultural Diversity (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 281–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross EA. (1920) The Principles of Sociology (Century Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM. (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sederberg PB, Howard MW, Kahana MJ. (2008) A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psych. Rev. 115(4):893–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW. (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G. (1908) Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (Duncker & Humbold, München, Germany).Google Scholar
• Stasser G. (1988) Computer-simulation as a research tool—The discuss model of group decision-making. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 24(5):393–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart GL. (2006) A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. J. Management 32(1):29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC. (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(1):515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vinokur A, Burnstein E. (1978) Depolarization of attitudes in groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(8):872–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webber SS, Donahue LM. (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. J. Management 27:141–162.Google Scholar
• Weenig MWH. (1999) Communication networks in the diffusion of an innovation in an organization. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 29(5):1072–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegge J, Roth C, Neubach B, Schmidt KH, Kanfer R. (2008) Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1301–1313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA. (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
• Wimmer A, Lewis K. (2010) Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):583–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young P. (2001) Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar