Conflicting Logics? A Multidimensional View of Industrial and Academic Science

References

• Agarwal R, Ohyama A. (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH. (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein J. (2008) Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ. (1984) Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Allen TJ, Katz R. (1992) Age, education and the technical ladder. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 39(3):237–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M. (2000) Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. J. Management Stud. 37(8):1101–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP. (1998) Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 35(4):427–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD. (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):960–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Schankerman M. (2009) University knowledge transfer: Private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives. J. Law Econom. 52(1):111–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Gokhale M, Yucel R, Clarridge B, Hilgartner S, Holtzman N. (2006) Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and predictors. Acad. Medicine 81(2):137–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. (1975) The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Soc. Sci. Inform. 14(6):19–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box S, Cotgrove S. (1966) Scientific identity, occupational selection, and role strain. British J. Sociol. 17(1):20–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradach JL, Eccles RG. (1989) Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 15:97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C, Medoff J. (1989) The employer size wage effect. J. Political Econom. 97(5):1027–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD. (2001) The company they keep: Founders’ models for organizing new firms. , Schoonhoven C, Romanelli E, eds. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic: Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 13–39.Google Scholar
• Bush V. (1945) Science—The endless frontier: A report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research. . Report, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Edwards JR. (2004) Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):822–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callon M. (1995) Four models for the dynamics of science. , Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Peterson JC, Pinch T, eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 29–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Sitkin SB, Long CP. (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–432.Link, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM. (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Copeland RA. (2007) Biomedical careers in industry: A few tips for the newcomer (Part 2). ASBMB Today (January):16–17.Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA. (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P. (2008) The historical origins of “open science”. Capitalism Soc. 3(2):. Article 5.Google Scholar
• Ding WW. (2006) Does science chase money? The impact of industry research on the selection of research topics among academic scientists. . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Ding WW. (2011) The impact of founders’ professional-education background on the adoption of open science by for-profit biotechnology firms. Management Sci. 57(2):257–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (1996) The normal science of structural contingency theory. , Clegg SR, Hardy C, Nord WR, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage, London), 57–76.Google Scholar
• Drucker PF. (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. Calif. Management Rev. 41(2):97–95.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. 31(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Fini R. (2010) Career paths, organizational affiliation, and the enactment of entrepreneurial intentions. . Working paper, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italty.Google Scholar
• Fini R, Lacetera N. (2010) Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research. , Libecap G, ed. Spanning Boundaries and Disciplines: University Technology Commercialization in the Idea Age, Vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O. (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Laursen K. (2005) Performance pay, delegation and multitasking under uncertainty and innovativeness: An empirical investigation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(2):246–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR. (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. , Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Furman JL, MacGarvie MJ. (2007) Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):756–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S. (2010) Is there a market for ideas? Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):805–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M, Kogut B. (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldberger ML, Flattau P, Maher BA. (1995) Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC. (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Hackett EJ. (1990) Science as a vocation in the 1990s. J. Higher Ed. 61(3):241–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C, Jiang L, Thursby J, Thursby M. (2009) Specific and general information sharing among academic scientists. . NBER Working Paper 15315, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hagstrom W. (1974) Competition in science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 39(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagstrom WO. (1975) The Scientific Community (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale).Google Scholar
• Hicks D. (1995) Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Indust. Corporate Change 4(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Ziedonis R. (2008) Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Idson TL. (1990) Establishment size, job-satisfaction and the structure of work. Appl. Econom. 22(8):1007–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Idson TL, Feaster DJ. (1990) A selectivity model of employer-size wage differentials. J. Labor Econom. 8(1):99–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Owners Association (2004) Employee inventor compensation practices survey. . Report, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Kaplan N. (1964) Organization: Will it choke or promote the growth of science? , Hill K, ed. The Management of Scientists (Beacon Press, Boston), 103–127.Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornhauser W. (1962) Scientists in Industry: Conflict and Accommodation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lacetera N. (2009) Different missions and commitment power in R&D organizations: Theory and evidence on industry-university alliances. Organ. Sci. 20(3):565–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Cockburn I, Henderson R. (2004) Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Adv. Strategic Management 21:133–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lach S, Schankerman M. (2008) Incentives and invention in universities. RAND J. Econom. 39:403–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B, Woolgar S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Lepak DP, Snell SA. (2002) Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. J. Management 28(4):517–543.Google Scholar
• Levin SG, Stephan PE. (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(1):114–132.Google Scholar
• Lim K. (2004) The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981–1997). Res. Policy 33(2):287–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Miller GA. (1976) Professionals in bureaucracy: Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(5):755–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman RH, Podsakoff PM. (1992) A metaanalytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 65(2):131–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F. (2010) The OncoMouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narin F, Pinski G, Gee H. (1976) The structure of biomedical literature. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27(1):24–45.Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF) (2003) Scientists and engineers statistical data system. . Accessed August 13, 2012, http://sestat.nsf.gov/.Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ. (2005) Cacophony or harmony? Multivocal logics and technology licensing by the Stanford University Department of Music. Indust. Corporate Change 14(1):93–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR. (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. 67(3):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR. (2004) The market economy, and the scientific commons. Res. Policy 33(3):455–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nissan AH. (1966) Similarities and differences between industrial and academic research. Res. Management 9(4):211–219.Google Scholar
• Oi WY, Idson TL. (1999) Firm size and wages. , Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3B (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2165–2214.Google Scholar
• Orth CD. (1959) The optimum climate for industrial research. Harvard Bus. Rev. 37(2):55–64.Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG. (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J. (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Res. Policy 32(6):1081–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. (2001) Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. , Vallas SP, ed. The Transformation of Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 10). (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 109–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parchomovsky G. (1999) Publish or perish. Michigan Law Rev. 98(4):926–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penin J. (2007) Open knowledge disclosure: An overview of the evidence and economic motivations. J. Econom. Surveys 21(2):326–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Salter A, Tartari V. (2011) Reaching across institutional logics: The hybridization of practices in university-industry relationships. . Working paper, Imperial College London, London.Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. (1962) The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1(1):54–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Theeke M. (2012) Getting competition down to a science: The effects of technological competition on firms’ scientific publications. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1135–1153.Link, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C. (2002) The tenuous trade-off between risk and incentives. J. Political Econom. 110(5):1071–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H. (2010) A taste for science? Ph.D. scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39(3):422–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S. (1986) The theory of equalizing differences. , Ashenfelter O, Layard R, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 641–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19(2):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N, Nelson R. (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy 23(3):323–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L. (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 16(4):691–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Ashforth BE. (1997) Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. J. Vocational Behav. 51(2):234–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Cohen WM. (2010) What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Sci. 56(12):2134–2153.Link, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Cohen WM. (2012) Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in startups versus established firms. . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Roach M. (2011) Not all scientists pay to be scientists: Heterogeneous preferences for publishing in industrial research. . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Roach M. (2012) Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLoS ONE 7(5):e36307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapin S. (2004) Who is the industrial scientist? , Grandin K, Wormbs N, Widmalm S, eds. The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications (Science History Publications, Cambridge, UK), 337–363.Google Scholar
• Stephan P. (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S. (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stokes D. (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W. (2008) Institutional logics. , Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby J, Thursby M. (2010) University licensing: Harnessing or tarnishing faculty research? , Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 10 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 159–189.Google Scholar
• Thursby J, Fuller AW, Thursby M. (2009) U.S. faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university. Res. Policy 38(1):14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallas SP, Kleinman DL. (2008) Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: The confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology. Socio-Econom. Rev. 6(2):283–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Cho C, Cohen WM. (2005) View from the bench: Patents and material transfers. Science 309(5743):2002–2003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M. (1949) The Methodology of Social Sciences. Translated by , Shils E, Finch H, (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Wood DA, LeBold WK. (1970) The multivariate nature of professional job satisfaction. Personnel Psych. 23(2):173–189.Crossref, Google Scholar