Social Influence and Entrepreneurship: The Effect of University Peers on Entrepreneurial Entry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0773

References

  • Ai C, Norton E. (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Ruef M. (2006) Organizations Evolving (Sage, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Zimmer C. (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. , Sexton D, Smilor R, eds. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (Ballinger Publishing, Pensacola, FL), 3–23.Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H, Renzulli LA, Langton N. (1998) Passing on privilege: Resources provided by self-employed parents to their self-employed children. , Leicht K, ed. Research in Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 16 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 291–317.Google Scholar
  • Allison PD, Christakis N. (2006) Fixed effects methods for the analysis of non repeated events. Sociol. Methodol. 36(1):155–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audia PG, Rider CI. (2006) Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Revisited. , Baum JR, Frese M, Baron RA, eds. The Psychology of Entrepreneurship (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 113–130.Google Scholar
  • Audia PG, Freeman JH, Reynolds PD. (2006) Organizational foundings in community context: Instruments manufacturers and their interrelationship with other organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):381–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Baron JN. (1984) Organizational perspectives on stratification. Annual Rev. Sociol. 10:37–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bercovitz J, Feldman M. (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beunza D, Stark D. (2004) Tools of the trade: The socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room. Indust. Corporate Change 13(2):369–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bian Y. (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(3):366–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biggs B. (2006) Hedgehogging, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Blossfeld H, Rohwer G. (1995) Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Brass DJ. (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. 28(2):327–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brittain JW, Freeman JH. (1986) Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry. . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  • Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. (1998) Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small Bus. Econom. 10(3):213–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS. (2001) Attachment, decay and social network. J. Organ. Behav. 22:619–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM. (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. , Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 19). (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 229–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C. (2008) The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. J. Political Econom. 116(5):951–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C. (2010) Sell side school ties. J. Finance 65(4):1409–1437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H. (1957) The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20(4):253–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colyvas A, Powell WW. (2006) Roads to institutionalization. The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. , Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27 (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 305–353.Google Scholar
  • Cox DR. (1972) Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
  • Darragh OM, Dodig VG, Hanley RPO. (1997) Will success spoil investment management? McKinsey Quart. 2(2):57–68.Google Scholar
  • Davis GF, Greve HR. (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Der Hovanesian M. (2001) Hedge-fund follies. BusinessWeek (September 7) . http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2001-09-16/hedge-fund-follies.Google Scholar
  • DiGregorio D, Shane S. (2003) Why do some universities generate more TLO start-ups than others? Res. Policy 32(2):209–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P, Powell W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobrev SD, Barnett WP. (2005) Organizational roles and the transition to entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 48(3):433–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR. (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4) 659–681.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Etzkowitz H. (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Res. Policy 27(8):823–833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falck O, Heblich S, Luedemann E. (2012) Identity and entrepreneurship: Do school peers shape entrepreneurial intentions? Small Bus. Econom. 39(1):39–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld SL. (1982) Social structure determinants of similarity among associates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(6):797–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K. (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J. (1986) Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. , Libecap G, ed. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 33–58.Google Scholar
  • Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT. (1983) The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(5):692–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giannetti M, Simonov A. (2009) Social interactions and entrepreneurial activity. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(3):665–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson DE, Lawrence BS. (2010) Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1159–1175.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P, Lerner J, Scharfstein DS. (2005) Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. J. Finance 60(2):577–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS. (1974) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B, Nanda A, Prats JM. (2009) Does individual performance affect entrepreneurial mobility? Empirical evidence from the financial analysis market. J. Financial Transformation 25:95–106.Google Scholar
  • Halaby CN. (2003) Where job values come from: Family and schooling background, cognitive ability, and gender. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):251–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardie I, MacKenzie D. (2006) Assembling an economic actor: The agencement of a hedge fund. Paper presented at the Workshop on New Actors in a Financialized Economy and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism, May 11–12 , Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London.Google Scholar
  • Higgins MC. (2005) Career Imprints: Creating Leaders Across an Industry (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Hoetker G. (2007) The use of probit and logit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jencks C, Riesman D. (1968) The Academic Revolution (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Jovanovic B. (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk AJ. (2012) Opportunity structures in established firms: Entrepreneurship versus intrapreneurship in mutual funds. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):484–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter RM. (1977) Some effects of proportion on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):965–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF. (1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C. (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
  • King G, Zeng L. (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. 9(2):137–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirzner IM. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. , Nohria N, Eccles R, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 216–239.Google Scholar
  • Lazear EP. (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman Brothers (2004) Starting a Hedge Fund: A U.S. Perspective, 3rd ed. (ISI Publications, Toronto).Google Scholar
  • Lerner J, Malmendier U. (2012) With a little help from my random friends: Success and failure in post-business school entrepreneurship. . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Liang B. (2000) Hedge funds: The living and the dead. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 35(3):309–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyness KS, Thompson DE. (2000) Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? J. Appl. Psych. 85(1):86–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mansfield M. (1961) Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29(4):741–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden PV. (1988) Homogeneity in confiding relations. Soc. Networks 10(1):57–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massa M, Reuter J, Zitzewitz E. (2010) When should firms share credit with employees? Evidence from anonymously managed mutual funds. J. Financial Econom. 95(3):400–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L. (1982) Women and weak ties: Differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 87(4):883–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L. (1986) Sex segregation in voluntary associations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(1):61–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mouw T. (2006) Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of recent research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32:79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery DC, Nelson R, Sampat BN, Ziedonis A. (2004) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Murray F. (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy 31(8–9) :1389–1403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nanda R, Sørensen JB. (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C. (2004) Computing interaction effects in logit and probit models. Stata J. 4(2):103–116.Google Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J. (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Res. Policy 32(6):1081–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. (2003) The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Res. Policy 32(9):1695–1711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW. (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW. (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 120(1):197–215.Google Scholar
  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renzulli AL, Aldrich HE, Moody J. (2000) Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Soc. Forces 79(2):523–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rider CI. (2012) Employees’ prior affiliations constrain organizational network change: A study of U.S. venture capital and private equity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):453–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts E. (1991) Entrepreneurs in High Technology—Lessons from MIT and Beyond (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Romanelli E, Schoonhoven CB. (2001) The local origins of new firms. , Schoonhoven CB, Romanelli E, eds. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Rosenthal SS, Strange WC. (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(2):377–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Shane SA. (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship. University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
  • Shue K. (2012) Executive networks and firm policies: Evidence from the random assignment of MBA peers. . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Siegel JI. (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB. (2007) Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):387–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB, Fassiotto MA. (2011) Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1322–1331.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Audia PG. (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):424–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe AL. (1965) Social structure and organizations. , March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
  • Strachman DA. (2000) The Fundamentals of Hedge Fund Management: How to Successfully Launch and Operate a Hedge Fund (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Ding WW. (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Sorenson O. (2005) Social networks and entrepreneurship. , Alvarez SA, Agarwal RR, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives (Springer, New York), 233–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suitor JJ, Keeton S. (1977) Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women’s support networks across a decade. Soc. Networks 19(1):51–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton PH. (1999) The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:19–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M, Karabel J. (1986) Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociol. Rev 51(2):184–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL. (2001) Medical Innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L, Darby M, Brewer M. (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–305.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.