Leisure Time Invention

References

• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. , Staw BT, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Fischer CM (2009) Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. , Locke EA, ed. The Blackwell Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Blackwell, London), 331–341.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz SS (1987) Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Report 30, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz ND (1989) The creative environment scales: The work environment inventory. Creativity Res. J. 2(4):231–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Mueller JS (2008) Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. , Zhou J, Shalley C, eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 33–64.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Mueller JS, Simpson WB, Hadley CN, Kramer JS, Fleming L (2002) Time pressure and creativity in organizations: A longitudinal field study. HBS Working Paper 02-073, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Armbruster BB (1989) Metacognition in creativity. , Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR, eds. Handbook of Creativity (Springer, Berlin), 177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer P (2008) Managing the unmanageable. Res. Tech. Management 51(4):41–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (1997) Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(5):84–93.Google Scholar
• Barron F, Harrington DM (1981) Creativity, intelligence and personality. Ann. Rev. Psych. 32:439–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basalla G (1988) The Evolution of Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bereiter C (2009) Innovation in the absence of principled knowledge: The case of the Wright brothers. Creativity Innovation Management 18(3):234–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown RT (1989) Creativity. What are we to measure? , Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR, eds. Handbook of Creativity (Springer, Berlin), 6–7.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Chesborough H (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. , Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J, eds. Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–14.Google Scholar
• Clark PB, Wilson JQ (1961) Incentive systems: A theory of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 6(2):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelsons RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Comanor WS, Scherer FM (1969) Patent statistics as a measure of technical change. J. Political Econom. 77(3):392–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coombs R, Hull R (1998) Knowledge management practices and path-dependency in innovation. Res. Policy 27(3):237–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coser R (1975) The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. , Closer L, ed. The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton (Harcourt Brace, New York), 237–263.Google Scholar
• Cross N, Clayburn Cross A (1996) Winning by design: The methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer. Design Stud. 17(1):91–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis L, Davis J, Hoisl K (2009) Leisure time invention—Waste of effort, or wellspring of breakthrough ideas? Paper presented at the European Policy on Intellectual Property Conference, September 24–25, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
• Deci EL (1972) Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 22(1):113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic Motivation (Plenum, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Baruch L, Narin F (1999) Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts J. 55(3):20–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Gregersen HB, Christensen CM (2009) The innovator’s DNA. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(12):60–67.Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Hargadon AB (2006) Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organ. Sci. 17(4):470–483.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Galenson DW, Weinberg BA (2001) Creating modern art: The changing careers of painters in France from Impressionism to Cubism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):1063–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galenson DW, Weinberg B (2005) Creative careers: The life cycle of Nobel laureates in economics. NBER Working Paper 11799, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Getzels JW, Csikszentmihalyi M (1967) Scientific creativity. Science J. 3(9):80–84.Google Scholar
• Getzels JW, Csikszentmihalyi M (1976) The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Gibbons M, Johnston R (1974) The roles of science in technological innovation. Res. Policy 3(3):220–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilfillan S (1935) The Sociology of Invention (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). [Reprinted 1970].Google Scholar
• Gläser J (2001) “Producing communities” as a theoretical challenge. Proc. Australian Sociol. Soc. Conf. (TASA 2001) (Australian Sociological Association, Sydney), 273–294.Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1:201–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (2002) Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 4th ed. (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gray CF, Larson EW (2003) Project Management, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Gray PH, Meister DB (2004) Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Sci. 50(6):821–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1970) Notes on the role of education in production functions and growth accounting. , Hansen L, ed. Education, Income, and Human Capital (NBER, Cambridge, MA), 71–115.Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA (1979) Types of rewards, cognitions, and work motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 4(1):75–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2007) Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity—Patent value and the German Employees’ Invention Act. Res. Policy 36(8):1143–1162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Hoisl K, Webb C (2008) European patent citations—How to count and how to interpret them. Working paper, University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
• Hastie R, Dawes RM (2009) Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: An introduction to C-K theory. Internat. Conf. Engrg. Design (ICED 03), Stockholm. http://tinyurl.com/aqm8eys.Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The configuration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in drug discovery. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klevorick AK, Levin RC, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1995) On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Res. Policy 24(2):185–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Wolf RG (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. , Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EE (1969) Job design and employee motivation. Personnel Psych. 22(4):426–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EE (1973) Motivation and Work Organizations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litchfield RC (2008) Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):649–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N (2005) The contributions of different groups of individuals to employees’ creativity. Adv. Developing Human Resources 7(2):182–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N, Oldham GR, Pratt MG (2002) There is no place like home? The contributions of work and non work creativity to employees’ creative performance. Acad. Management J. 45(4):757–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markides CC, Geroski PA (2004) Fast Second (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• McGraw K (1978) The detrimental effects of reward on performances: A literature review and a prediction model. , Lepper M, Greene D, eds. The Hidden Costs of Reward (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 33–60.Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Bartel CA, Kurtzberg T (2003) Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. , Paulus P, Nijstad B, eds. Group Creativity (Oxford University Press, New York), 32–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray EJ (1964) Motivation and Emotion (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Harvard, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Olton RM (1979) Experimental studies of incubation: Searching for the elusive. J. Creative Behav. 13(1):9–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1994) Using Patent Data as Science and Technological Indicators (Patent Manual) (OECD, Paris).Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of formal structure in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne RL (1990) The effectiveness of research teams: A review. , West MA, Farr JL, eds. Innovaton and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 101–122.Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (1997) Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Blum TC (2000) Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Acad. Management J. 43(6):1107–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poincaré H (1913) The Foundations of Science (Science Press, Lancaster, PA).Google Scholar
• Reid SE, De Brentani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. J. Product Innovation Management 21(3):170–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts K, Biddle J (1994) The transition into management by scientists and engineers: A misallocation or efficient use of human resources? Human Resource Management 33(4):561–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Alexandre MT (2009) Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 20(4):759–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1975) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J (2008) Organizational creativity research—A historical overview. , Zhou J, Shalley CE, eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 3–31.Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Sherwood B (2006) Innovation: Do I need it? Do I have it? Can I get it? Metal Finishing 104(11):55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (1999) Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psych. Inquiry 10(4):309–328.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as source of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Stern S (1999). Do scientists pay to be scientists: NBER Working Paper W7410, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Takeishi A (2002) Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organ. Sci. 13(3):321–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Schroeder K (2003) Inside Intuit: How the Makers of Quicken Beat Microsoft and Revolutionized an Entire Industry (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• 3M (2002) A Century of Innovation (3M Company, St. Paul, MN).Google Scholar
• Tschang FT, Szczypula J (2006) Idea creation, constructivism and evolution as key characteristics in the videogame artifact design process. Eur. Management J. 24(4):270–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psych. 5(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1990) Task partitioning: An innovation process variable. Res. Policy 19:407–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• West J, Lakhani KR (2009) Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry Innovation 15(2):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wozniak S (2006) Steve Wozniak: How I invented the computer FORA. Accessed December 22, 2009, http://fora.tv/2006/09/26/Steve_Wozniak/.Google Scholar