Expressed Humility in Organizations: Implications for Performance, Teams, and Leadership

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795

References

  • Allison ST, Messick DM, Goethals GR (1989) On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Soc. Cognition 7(3):275–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ames C (1992) Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Ed. Psych. 84(3):261–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C, Srivastava S, Beer JS, Spataro SE, Chatman JA (2006) Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6):1094–1110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1991) Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J. Appl. Psych. 76(5):732–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashton MC, Lee K (2008) The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. J. Res. Personality 42(5):1216–1228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, Weber TJ (2009) Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Rev. Psych. 60:421–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bales RF (1950) Interaction Process Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personality Psych. 44(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Jones EE (1978) When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s knowledge: Consistency and compensation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(6):608–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boje DM, Rosile GA, Durant RA, Luhman JT (2004) Enron spectacles: A critical dramaturgical analysis. Organ. Stud. 25(5):751–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K, Lennox R (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. 110(2):305–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boswell WR, Boudreau JW, Tichy J (2005) The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effect. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):882–892.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2003) Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):552–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke RJ (2006) Why leaders fail: Exploring the darkside. Internat. J. Manpower 27(1):91–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE (2003) Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Church A, Tornow W, Burke W, Hogan R, Avolio B (1998) From both sides now: Leadership—So close and yet so far. Indust. Organ. Psychologist 35(3):1–14.Google Scholar
  • Collins J (2005) Level 5 leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(1):66–76.Google Scholar
  • Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA (2008) From the editors: Publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Acad. Management J. 51(4):616–620.Google Scholar
  • Colvin CR, Block J, Funder DC (1995) Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(6):1152–1162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook JD, Hepworth SJ, Wall TD, Warr PB (1981) The Experience of Work: A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and Their Use (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psych. Assess. 4(1):5–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Côté S, Miners CTH (2006) Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cropanzano R, Bowen DE, Gilliland SW (2007) The management of organizational justice. Acad. Management Perspect. 21(4):34–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):33–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis DE, Worthington ELJrHook JN (2010) Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment. J. Positive Psych. 5(4):243–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeVellis RF (2011) Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 3rd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Dickter DN, Roznowski M, Harrison DA (1996) Temporal tempering: An event history analysis of the process of voluntary turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 81(6):705–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2002) Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):611–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodrill CB (1983) Long-term reliability of the Wonderlic Personnel Test. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 51(2):316–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dotlich DL, Cairo PC (2003) Why CEOs Fail: The 11 Behaviors That Can Derail Your Climb to the Top—And How to Manage Them (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Dvir T, Eden D, Avolio BJ, Shamir B (2002) Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Acad. Management J. 45(4):735–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck CS (2000) Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (Psychology Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Dweck CS, Leggett EL (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psych. Rev. 95(2):256–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards JR, Bagozzi RP (2000) On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psych. Methods 5(2):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrlich HJ, Graeven DB (1971) Reciprocal self-disclosure in a dyad. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 7(4):389–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Exline JJ, Geyer A (2004) Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self Identity 3(2):95–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Exline JJ, Campbell WK, Baumeister RF, Joiner T, Krueger J, Kachorek LV (2004) Humility and modesty. , Peterson C, Seligman M, eds. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification (Values in Action Institute, Cincinnati), 461–475.Google Scholar
  • Ferris GR (1985) Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process: A constructive replication. J. Appl. Psych. 70(4):777–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S (2003) Why Smart Executives Fail: And What You Can Learn from Their Mistakes (Portfolio Trade, New York).Google Scholar
  • Foa UG, Foa EB (1974) Societal Structures of the Mind (Charles C. Thomas, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Freedman LS, Schatzkin A (1992) Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 136(9):1148–1159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fulmer RM, Conger JA (2004) Growing Your Company’s Leaders: How Great Organizations Use Succession Management to Sustain Competitive Advantage (AMACOM, New York).Google Scholar
  • Furnham A, Hosoe T, Tang TLP (2002) Male hubris and female humility? A crosscultural study of ratings of self, parental, and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain, and Japan. Intelligence 30(1):101–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong Y, Huang JC, Farh JL (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad. Management J. 52(4):765–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gosling SD, Ko SJ, Mannarelli T, Morris ME (2002) A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(3):379–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graen GB, Liden RC, Hoel W (1982) Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. J. Appl. Psych. 67(6):868–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grenberg JM (2005) Précis of Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption and Virtue (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J. Management 26(3):463–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hareli S, Weiner B (2000) Accounts for success as determinants of perceived arrogance and modesty. Motiv. Emotion 24(3):215–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiller NJ, Hambrick DC (2005) Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management J. 26(4):297–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinkin TR (1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. J. Management 21(5):967–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogan R, Kaiser RB (2005) What we know about leadership. Rev. General Psych. 9(2):169–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holtom BC, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Bussmann MB (2008) Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):231–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hom PW, Griffeth RW (1995) Employee Turnover (South-Western, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
  • Horowitz LM, Wilson KR, Turan B, Zolotsev P, Constantino MJ, Henderson L (2006) How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(1):67–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hume D (1994) Political Writings (Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
  • Jackson DN (1977) Reliability of the Jackson personality inventory. Psych. Rep. 40(2):613–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John OP, Robins RW (1993) Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. J. Personality 61(4):521–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Erez A, Bono JE, Thoresen CJ (2003) The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personality Psych. 56(2):303–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4):692–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny DA (1994) Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King LA, Hicks JA (2007) Whatever happened to “what might have been”? Regrets, happiness, and maturity. Amer. Psych. 62(7):625–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kipnis D (1972) Does power corrupt? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 24(1):33–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kline RB (1998) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Knight PA, Nadel JI (1986) Humility revisited: Self-esteem, information search, and policy consistency. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 38(2):196–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolar DW, Funder DC, Colvin CR (1996) Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. J. Personality 64(2):311–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence PR, Nohria N (2002) Driven: How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Lubit R (2002) The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers. Acad. Management Executive 16(1):127–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Margolis HD, Thomas V (1980) The measurement of narcissism in adolescents with and without behavioral and emotional disabilities. Master’s thesis, United States International University, San Diego.Google Scholar
  • McCrae RR, Costa PTJr (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(1):81–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCrae RR, Costa PTJr (1989) The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin’s circumplex and the five-factor model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(4):586–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCrae RR, Costa PTJr (2004) A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventory. Personality Individual Differences 36(3):587–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McIntyre RM, Salas E (1995) Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. , Guzzom A, Salas E, eds. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 9–45.Google Scholar
  • Means JR, Wilson GL, Sturm C, Biron JE, Bach PJ (1990) Theory and practice: Humility as a psychotherapeutic formulation. Counseling Quart. 3(2):211–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meece JL, Blumenfeld PC, Hoyle RH (1988) Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. J. Ed. Psych. 80(4):514–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaels E, Handfield-Jones H, Axelrod B (2001) The War for Talent (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psych. Rev. 102(2):246–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris JA, Brotheridge CM, Urbanski JC (2005) Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations 58(10):1323–1350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy KR (1996) Individual differences and behavior in organizations: Much more than g. , Murphy KR, ed. Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–30.Google Scholar
  • Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD, Hauck WW (1991) A comparison of cluster-specific and population-averaged approaches for analyzing correlated binary data. Internat. Statist. Rev. 59:25–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen R, Marrone JA, Slay HS (2010) A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 17(1):33–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owens BP (2011) Humility in Organizational Leadership (ProQuest/UMI Dissertation Publishing, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
  • Owens BP, Hekman DR (2012) Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 55(4):787–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park N, Peterson CM (2003) Virtues and organizations. , Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berret-Koehler, San Francisco), 33–47.Google Scholar
  • Perry SJ, Witt LA, Penney LM, Atwater L (2010) The downside of goal-focused leadership: The role of personality in subordinate exhaustion. J. Appl. Psych. 95(6):1145–1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson C, Seligman M (2004) The Values in Action VIA Classification of Strengths (Values in Action Institute, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poropat AE (2009) A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of Personality on academic performance. Psych. Bull. 135(2):322–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Management J. 53(3):617–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richards N (1992) Humility (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Richardson HA, Vandenberg RJ (2005) Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work unit level model of employee involvement. J. Organ. Behavior 26(5):561–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts RC, Wood WJ (2003) Humility and epistemic goods. Intellectual Virtue 1(9):257–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal SA, Pittinsky TL (2006) Narcissistic leadership. Leadership Quart. 17(6):617–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell SS, Spitzmüller C, Lin LF, Stanton JM, Smith PC, Ironson GH (2004) Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Ed. Psych. Measurement 64(5):878–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 25(3):293–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 3(1):71–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt FL, Hunter J (2004) General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):162–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwab DP (1980) Construct validity in organization behavior. , Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 3–43.Google Scholar
  • Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized self-efficacy scale. , Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (Nfer-Nelson, Windsor, UK), 35–37.Google Scholar
  • Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: An introduction. Amer. Psych. 55(1):5–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Steiner ID (1972) Group Process and Productivity (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sullivan HS (1953) The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tangney JP (2000) Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 19(1):70–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tangney JP (2002) Humility. , Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, eds. Handbook of Positive Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York), 411–422.Google Scholar
  • Taylor SE (1989) Positive Illusions: Creative Self-Deception and the Healthy Mind (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Taylor SE, Brown JD (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psych. Bull. 103(2):193–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Templeton JM (1997) Worldwide Laws of Life (Templeton Foundation Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Tichy NM, Cohen EB (1997) The Leadership Engine: How Winning Companies Build Leaders at Every Level (Harper Collins, New York).Google Scholar
  • Turner JC, Midgley C, Meyer DK, Gheen M, Anderman EM, Kang Y, Patrick H (2002) The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. J. Ed. Psych. 94(1):88–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ungerer JA, Waters B, Barnett B, Dolby R (1997) Defense style and adjustment in interpersonal relationships. J. Res. Personality 31(3):375–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaillant G (1992) The Wisdom of the Ego (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Vandewalle D (1997) Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Ed. Psych. Measurement 57(6):995–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vera D, Rodriguez-Lopez A (2004) Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organ. Dynamics 33(4):393–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (2001) Leadership as the legitimation of doubt. , Bennis W, Spreitzer GM, Cummings TG, eds. The Future of Leadership: Today’s Top Leadership Thinkers Speak to Tomorrow’s Leaders (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 91–102.Google Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld BM, Swann WB, Brockner J, Bartel CA (2007) Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1235–1253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiggins JS (1979) A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(3):395–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wonderlic EF (1973) Wonderlic Personnel Test: Manual (Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z, Zyphur MJ, Preacher KJ (2009) Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):695–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.