The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806

References

  • Abbott A (1981) Status and status strain in the professions. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(4):819–835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M (2001) Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations 54(7):863–886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Robertson M (2006) The best and the brightest: The construction, significance and effects of elite identities in consulting firms. Organization 13(2):195–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Willmott H (2002) Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. J. Management Stud. 39(5):619–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL, Thomas R (2008) Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization 15(1):5–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M (2008) Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organ. Sci. 19(2):202–220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH (1993) Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):88–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attewell P (1987) The deskilling controversy. Work Occupations 14(3):323–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barker JR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38:408–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barker JR (1999) The Discipline of Teamwork: Participation and Concertive Control (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1988) Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Towards a pragmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. , Torbert P, Barley S, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 6 (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 33–80.Google Scholar
  • Barley SR, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):363–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR, Kunda G (2004) Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Barley SR, Meyerson DE, Grodal S (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organ. Sci. 22(4):887–906.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck U (1994) The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. , Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S, eds. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 1–55.Google Scholar
  • Bergami M, Bagozzi RP (2000) Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British J. Soc. Psych. 39(4):555–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau JR (1984) Architects and Firms: A Sociological Perspective on Architectural Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Braverman H (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (Monthly Review Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Burke PJ, Reitzes DC (1991) An identity theory approach to commitment. Soc. Psych. Quart. 54(3):239–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burris BH (1998) Computerization of the workplace. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:141–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P (2006) Artifacts and knowledge negotiation across domains. , Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 101–118.Google Scholar
  • Carmeli A (2005) Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organ. Stud. 26(3):443–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Covaleski MA, Dirsmith MW, Heian JB, Samuel S (1998) The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):293–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dale K (2005) Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization 12(5):649–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deetz S (1997) Discursive formations, strategized subordination and self-surveillance. , McKinley AS, Starkey KP, eds. Foucault, Management and Organization Theory (Sage, London), 151–172.Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K (2006) Perceptual biases and misinterprtation of artifacts. , Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 61–80.Google Scholar
  • Engel GV (1970) Professional autonomy and bureaucratic organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 15(1):12–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ezzamel M, Willmott H (1998) Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):358–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fraser JA (2001) White Collar Sweat-Shop: The Deterioration of Work and Its Rewards in Corporate America (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Freidson E (1983) The Theory of the Professions: State of the Art (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
  • Freidson E (1984) The changing nature of professional control. Annual Rev. Sociol. 10:1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freidson E (1986) Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Gant D, Kiesler S (2001) Blurring the boundaries: Cell phones, mobility and the line between work and personal life. , Brown B, Green N, Harper R, eds. Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age (Springer, New York), 121–131.Google Scholar
  • Garson B (1988) The Electronic Sweatshop: How Computers Are Transforming the Office of the Future into the Factory of the Past (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Giddens A (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Giddens A (1994) Living in a post-traditional society. , Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S, eds. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 56–109.Google Scholar
  • Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):499–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golden AG, Geisler C (2007) Work–Life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations 60(3):519–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goode WJ (1960) The profession: Reports and opinion: Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: Psychology, sociology and medicine. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(6):902–914.Google Scholar
  • Green N (2001) Who’s watching whom? Monitoring and accountability in mobile relations. , Brown B, Green N, Harper R, eds. Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age (Springer, New York), 32–44.Google Scholar
  • Green N (2002) On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. Inform. Soc. 18(4):281–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR (2010) The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Acad. Management J. 53(5):989–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR (1976) Group influences on individuals. , Dunnette M, ed. Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, Chicago), 1455–1526.Google Scholar
  • Hackman JR (1983) Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall RH (1968) Professionalization and bureaucratization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 33(1):92–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansson RO, Hogan R, Johnson JA, Schroeder D (1983) Disentangling type A behavior: The roles of ambition, insensitivity, and anxiety. J. Res. Personality 17(2):186–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haug MR, Sussman MB (1969) Professional autonomy and the revolt of the client. Soc. Problems 17(2):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hislop D, Axtell C (2011) Mobile phones during work and non-work time: A case study of mobile, non-managerial workers. Inform. Organ. 21(1):41–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogan R, Nicholson RA (1988) The meaning of personality test scores. Amer. Psychologist 43(8):621–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes EC (1963) The professions. Daedalus 92(4):655–668.Google Scholar
  • Janz BD, Colquitt JA, Noe RA (1997) Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development and contextual support variables. Personnel Psych. 50(4):877–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jermier JM (1998) Introduction: Critical perspectives on organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):235–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalleberg A (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kraft P (1979) The industrialization of computer programming: From programming to software production. , Zimbalist A, ed. Case Studies in the Labour Process (Monthly Review Press, New York), 1–17.Google Scholar
  • Kunda G (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Langfred CW (2000) The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 21(5):563–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langfred CW (2004) Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. 47(3):385–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langfred CW (2005) Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. J. Management 31(4):513–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langfred CW (2007) The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. 50(4):885–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson MS (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormick JS, Dery K, Kolb DG (2012) Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and employee engagement. Organ. Dynamics 41(3):194–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J, Knopoff K, Beckman C (1998) An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: Bounded emotionality at the body shop. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):429–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazmanian M (2012) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print July 30.Google Scholar
  • Meiksins PF, Watson JM (1989) Professional autonomy and organizational constraint: The case of engineers. Sociol. Quart. 30(4):561–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Middleton CA (2007) Illusions of balance and control in an always-on environment: A case study of BlackBerry users. Continuum: J. Media Cultural Stud. 21(2):165–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Middleton CA, Cukier W (2006) Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(3):252–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray WC, Rostis A (2007) “Who’s running the machine?” A theoretical exploration of work stress and burnout of technologically tethered workers. J. Employment Rights 12(3):249–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RL (1985) Ideology, practice, and professional autonomy: Social values and client relationships in the large law firm. Stanford Law Rev. 37(2):503–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noble D (1977) America By Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism (Alfred Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1998) Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):328–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prasad P (1993) Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1400–1429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prasopoulou E, Pouloud A, Panteli N (2006) Enacting new temporal boundaries: The role of mobile phones. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(3):277–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli A, Pratt MG, eds. (2006) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Reith G (2004) Consumption and its discontents: Addiction, identity, and the problems of freedom. British J. Sociol. 55(2):283–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson M, Scarbrough H, Swan J (2003) Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects. Organ. Stud. 24(6):831–857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandberg J, Pinnington AH (2009) Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. J. Management Stud. 46(7):1138–1170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schein EH (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Scott WR (1982) Managing professional work: Three models of control for health organizations. Health Services Res. 17(3):213–240.Google Scholar
  • Scott WR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory Soc. 37(5):427–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott WR, Meyer JW (1991) The organization of societal sectors. , Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 108–140.Google Scholar
  • Sewell G (1998) The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):397–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell G, Barker JR (2006) Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):934–961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma A (1997) Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Acad. Management Rev. 22(3):758–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spector PE (1986) Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations 39(11):1005–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart GL, Barrick MR (2000) Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. 43(2):135–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd .ed (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):145–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wajcman J, Rose E (2011) Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organ. Stud. 32(7):941–961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallace JE (1995) Organizational and professional commitment in professional and nonprofessional organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):228–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams RBJrHaney TL, Lee KL, Kong Y-H, Blumenthal JA, Whalen RE (1980) Type A behavior, hostility, and coronary atherosclerosis. Psychosomatic Medicine 42(6):539–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willmott H (1993) Strength is ignorance, slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. J. Management Stud. 30(4):515–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.