Organizational Learning and the Technology of Foolishness: The Case of Virtual Worlds at IBM

References

• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyris C (1995) On Organizational Learning (Blackwell Business, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning: Theory, Method and Practice (Addison-Wesley, London).Google Scholar
• Arvanitis TN (2006) Virtual reality in medicine. , Lazakidou A, ed. Handbook of Research on Informatics in Healthcare and Biomedicine (Idea Group Reference, Hershey, PA), 59–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Au W (2008) The Making of Second Life (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SE (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1986) Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Acad. Management Rev. 11(3):656–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bjelland O, Wood R (2008) An inside view of IBM’s “Innovation Jam”. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(1):32–40.Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown JS (2003) Foreword: Innovating innovation. Open Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown A, Starkey K (2000) Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):102–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castronova E (2005) Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Castronova E (2007) Exodus to the Virtual World (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Czerniawska F, Potter G (2001) Business in a Virtual World: Exploiting Information for Competitive Advantage (Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN).Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin N, Lincoln Y (2000) Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. , Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 1–32.Google Scholar
• Dierkes M, Marz L, Teele C (2001a) Technological visions, technological development, and organizational learning. , Dierkes M, Antal B, Child J, Nonaka I, eds. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 282–301.Google Scholar
• Dierkes M, Antal B, Child J, Nonaka I, eds. (2001b) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Di Maggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dittrich K, Duysters G, de Man AP (2007) Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks: The case of IBM. Res. Policy 36(10):1496–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodgson M (1993) Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organ. Stud. 14(3):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2005) Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation and Organization (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2007) “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ. Sci. 18(5):849–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Hardy C (1996) Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1120–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Heller T (1994) The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organ. Sci. 5(2):200–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith M, Crossan M, Nicolini D (2000) Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. J. Management Stud. 37(6):783–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Johnson S (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1464–1480.Link, Google Scholar
• Fetscherin M, Latteman C, Lang G (2008) Virtual worlds research: A conceptual primer. J. Electronic Commerce Res. 9(3):192–194.Google Scholar
• Fiol C, O’Connor E (2005) Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ. Sci. 16(1):19–32.Link, Google Scholar
• Gann DM, Dodgson M, Bhardwaj D (2011) Physical-digital integration in city infrastructure. IBM J. Res. Development 55(1–2):1–10.Google Scholar
• Garau M (2006) Selective fidelity: Investigating priorities for the creation of expressive avatars. , Schoeder R, Axelsson A, eds. Avatars at Work and Play (Springer, London), 17–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garvin D, Edmondson A, Gino F (2008) Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(3):1–10.Google Scholar
• Gerstner L (2002) Who Says Elephants Can’t Dance: Inside IBM’s Historic Turnaround (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Goodman PS, Darr ED (1998) Computer-aided systems and communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments. MIS Quart. 22(4):417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J, Duysters G (2002) Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: The efficacy of multiple contacts. Organ. Stud. 23(4):525–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heeter C (1992) Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environments 1(2):262–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemp P (2006) Avatar-based marketing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(6):48–54.Google Scholar
• Hemp P (2008) Getting real about the virtual world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(10):27–28.Google Scholar
• Huizinga J (1955) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture (Beacon Press, Boston). [Orig. pub. 1938.]Google Scholar
• IBM (2007) Virtual worlds, real leaders: Online games put the future of business leadership on display. Report, IBM, Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M (2006) Questing for knowledge—Virtual worlds as dynamic processes of social interaction. , Schoeder R, Axelsson A, eds. Avatars at Work and Play (Springer, London), 209–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane P (2004) The Play Ethic: A Manifesto for a Different Way of Living (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Kane G, Alavi M (2007) Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ. Sci. 18(5):796–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Kang SC, Morris SS, Snell SA (2007) Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and human value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):236–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King RJ (2007). From the fire pit to the forbidden city: An outsider’s look at the evolution of IBM’s virtual universe community. Report, IBM, Armonk, NY. http://dancinginkproductions.com/uploads/pdfs/Firepit_to_Forbidden_City_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kohler T, Matzler K, Fuller J (2009) Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation 29(6–7):395–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee T (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Leonardi P (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C, Ronson S (2006) Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. , Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 81–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1976) The technology of foolishness. , March JG, Olsen JP, eds. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Universitetsförlaget, Oslo, Norway), 69–81.Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1999) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall C, Rossman G (1995) Designing Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Morgan G (1986) Images of Organization (Sage, New York).Google Scholar
• Nevo S, Nevo D, Carmel E (2011) Unlocking the business potential of virtual worlds. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(3):13–17.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Yates J, Okamur K, Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. 6(4):423–444.Link, Google Scholar
• Overby S (2008) Strategic planning in the real world: Everyone agrees that having a strategic plan for IT is a good thing, but most CIOs approach the process with fear and loathing. CIO 21(8):28–37.Google Scholar
• Palmisano S (2006) The globally integrated enterprise. Foreign Affairs 85(3):127–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuters (2006) IBM accelerates push into 3D virtual worlds. (November 9). http://secondlife.reuters.com/stories/2006/11/09/ibm-accelerates-push-into-3d-virtual-worlds/.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sater M, Steed A (2002) Meeting people virtually: Experiments in shared virtual environments. , Schoeder R, ed. The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments (Springer, London), 146–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Schrage M (2000) Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Schroeder R (2002) Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research. , Schoeder R, ed. The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments (Springer, London), 1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Hiltz S, Nardi B, Rennecker J, Stucky S (2008) Using synthetic worlds for work and learning. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22:Article 19.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Sonnenwald D (2006) Collaborative virtual environments for scientific collaboration: Technical and organizational design frameworks. , Schroeder R, Axelsson A, eds. Avatars at Work and Play (Springer, London), 63–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W (1992) Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. 29(6):713–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton-Smith B (1997) The Ambiguity of Play (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Swanson EB, Ramiller NC (1997) The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organ. Sci. 8(5):458–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Tapscott D, Williams D (2006) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything (Portfolio, New York).Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. 44(6):743–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Tuomi I (2002) Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1990) Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program. Organ. Sci. 1(3):313–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The Innovation Journey (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• van Dijk J (1999) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46(2):186–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Wang P, Ramiller N (2009) Community learning in information technology innovation. MIS Quart. 33(4):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar