The Persistent Effect of Geographic Distance in Acquisition Target Selection

References

• Afuah A (2003) Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the Internet: Are firms really shrinking?. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):34–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton E (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Auster ER (1986) Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of size and age and their strategic implications. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organization Behavior Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 165–198.Google Scholar
• Amit R, Shoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. 14(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Delios A (1997) Location specificity and the transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 28(3):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews KR (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy (Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in organizations. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Arikan A, ed. (2005) In the Market for Firms, How Should a Firm Be Sold? (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Sorenson O, Hage J (2001) Tradeoffs in the organization of production: Multiunit firms, geographic dispersion and organizational learning. Baum JAC, Greve HR, eds. Multiunit Organization and Multimarket StrategyAdvances in Strategic Management Vol. 18 (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Amburgey TL (1990) Do larger organizations generate stronger competition? Singh JV, eds. Organizational Evolution: New Directions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 78–102.Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1986) Strategic factors markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Li SX, Usher JM (2000) Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):766–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, DeYoung R (2002) Technological progress and the geographic expansion of the banking industry. J. Money, Credit, Banking 38(6):1483–1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Brennan MJ, Cao HH (1997) International portfolio investment flows. J. Finance 52(5):1851–1880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LA, Holmes J (1971) Search behavior in an intra-urban migration context: A spatial perspective. Environment Planning 3(3):307–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruton GD, Oviatt BM, White MA (1994) Performance of acquisitions of distressed firms. Acad. Management J. 37(4):972–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadwallader M (1975) A behavioral model of consumer spatial decision making. Econom. Geography 51(4):339–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Shen JC (2007) Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns. Strategic Management J. 28(9):891–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Dussuage P, Mitchell W (1998) Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management J. 19(7):631–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves R (1982) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Chapman K, Edmond H (2000) Mergers/acquisitions and restructuring in the EU chemical industry: Patterns and implications. Regional Stud. 34(8):753–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi T (1994) Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management J. 12(4):271–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark WAV (1982) Recent research on migration and mobility: A review and interpretation. Progress Planning 18(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark WAV (1993) Search and choice in urban housing markets. Garling T, Golledge RG, eds. Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographic Approaches (Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam), 298–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark WAV, Flowerdew R (1982) A review of search models and their application to search in the housing market. Clark WAV, eds. Modeling Housing Market Search (Croom Helm, London), 4–29.Google Scholar
• Clark WAV, Smith TR (1979) Modeling information use in a spatial context. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 69(4):575–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen N (2000) Business location decision-making and the cities: Bringing companies back. Report, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7(5):477–501.Link, Google Scholar
• Cosslett SR (1981) Maximum likelihood estimator for choice based samples. Econometrica 49(5):1289–1316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couclelis H (2009) Rethinking time geography in the information age. Environment Planning A 41(7):1556–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54(6):2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (2001) The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. J. Political Econom. 109(4):811–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin R (1982) Racial differences in the search for housing. Clark WAV, eds. Modeling Housing Market Search (Croom Helm, London), 81–105.Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2008) Leading groups from a distance: How to mitigate consequences of geographic dispersion. Weisband SP, eds. Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically-Supported Work (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Abingdon, UK), 33–50.Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Ghosh T (2005) Dealing with distance in team networks: A relational model of communication technology use. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Curran C, Carlson L, Ford DA (1982) Theory of residential location decisions of two worker households. J. Urban Econom. 12(1):102–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Sormunen J, Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management J. 9(2):123–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlquist M, Robertsson G (2001) Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. J. Financial Econom. 59(3):413–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danzon PM, Epstein A, Nicholson S (2007) Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Managerial Decision Econom. 28(4–5):307–328.Google Scholar
• Delios A, Henisz W (2003) Uncertainty, imitation and location: Japanese multinational corporations 1990–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):443–475.Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Monge P (1999) Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. 10(6):693–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Desbarats J (1983) Spatial choice and constraints on behavior. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 73(3):340–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dicken P (1971) Some aspects of decision making behavior of business organizations. Econom. Geography 47(3):426–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1510.Link, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dudley M (1990) Competition by choice: The impact of consumer search on firm location decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(5):1092–1104.Google Scholar
• Duerloo MC, Clark WAV, Dieleman FM (1990) Choice of residential environment in the Randstad. Urban Stud. 27(3):335–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duhaime IM, Schwenk CR (1985) Conjectures on cognitive simplification in acquisition and divestment decision making. Acad. Management Rev. 10(2):287–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton BC, Lipsey R (1979) Comparison shopping and the clustering of homogeneous firms. J. Regional Sci. 19(4):421–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Fung H-G, Gerlowski DA, Silberman J (1996) A note on “State characteristics and the location of foreign direct investment within the United States”. Rev. Econom. Statist. 78(2):367–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaswirth JL (1976) On probabilistic models of consumer search for information. Quart. J. Econom. 90(1):38–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golledge RG (2002) The nature of geographic knowledge. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 92(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golledge RG, Stimson RJ (1997) Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Graff TO, Ashton D (1994) Spatial diffusion of Wal-Mart: Contagious and reverse hierarchical elements. Professional Geographer 46(1):19–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R (1991) A resource based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Management Rev. 33(3):114–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green MB (1987) Merger behavior for the United States: Some spatial aspects. GeoJournal 15(1):97–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green MB, Cromley RG (1984) Merger and acquisition fields for large United States cities 1955–1970. Regional Stud. 18(4):291–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2000) Organizational location decisions: Competition, learning, and strategy in Tokyo banking, 1894–1936. Acad. Management J. 43(5):816–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2001) How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance 56(3):1053–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OE (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1999) The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1982) Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management J. 3(2):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan TH, Rhoades SA (1987) Acquisition targets and motives: The case of the banking industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 69(1):67–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harzing A-W, Feely AJ (2008) The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships. Cross Cultural Management: Internat. J. 15(1):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hauptman O, Hirji KK (1999) Managing integration and coordination in cross-functional teams: An international study of concurrent engineering product development. R&D Management 29(2):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Tversky A (1991) Preferences and beliefs: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 4(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter S (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede GH (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Howell RA (1970) Plan to integrate your acquisitions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 48(November/December):66–76.Google Scholar
• Hsieh DA, Manski CF, McFadden D (1985) Estimation of response probabilities from augmented retrospective observations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 80(391):651–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman G (2001) Familiarity breeds investment. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(3):659–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff JO (1984) Distance decay models of residential search. Gaile G, Wilmott C, eds. Spatial Statistics and Models (Reidel, New York), 345–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff JO (1986) Geographic regularities in residential search behavior. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 76(2):208–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphreys JS, Whitelaw JS (1979) Immigrants in an unfamiliar environment: Location decision making under constrained circumstances. Geografiska Annaler B 61(1):8–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hymer S (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Baum JAC (1997) Chain affiliation and the failure of Manhattan hotels, 1898–1980. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):68–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itami H, Roehl T (1987) Mobilizing Invisible Assets (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 63(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonas AEG (1992) Corporate takeover and the politics of community: The case of Norton Company in Worcester. Econom. Geography 68(4):348–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Swaminathan A, Mitchell W (2006) Turnover events, vicarious information, and the reduced likelihood of outlet-level exit among small multiunit organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):118–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Kang JK, Stulz R (1997) Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. J. Financial Econom. 46(1):3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2000) Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1061–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kierulff HE (1981) Finding the best acquisition candidates. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59(1):66–68.Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What do we know about proximity in work groups? A legacy of research on physical distance. , Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 57–80.Google Scholar
• King G, Zeng L (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. 9(2):137–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. Amer. J. Political Sci. 44(2):347–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koeplin J, Sarin A, Shapiro AC (2000) The private company discount. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 12(4):48–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 23:411–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohn MG, Shavell S (1974) The theory of search. J. Econom. Theory 9(2):93–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Political Econom. 99(3):483–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan TR (1989) Infrastructure and economic transformation. Andersson AE, Batten DF, Johansson B, Nijkamp P, eds. Advances in Spatial Theory and Dynamics, Chapter 16 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Landier A, Nair VB, Wulf J (2007) Trade-offs in staying close: Corporate decision making and geographic dispersion. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(3):1119–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh R, North DJ (1978) Acquisitions in British industries. Hamilton FEI, eds. Contemporary Industrialization (Longman, London), 158–181.Google Scholar
• Lenz AJ, Lafrance J (1996) Meeting the challenge: U.S. industry faces the 21st century—The chemical industry. Technical report, Office of Technology Policy, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):94–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLennon D, Wood G (1982) Information acquisition: Patterns and strategies. Clark WAV, eds. Modelling Housing Market Search (Croom Helm, London), 134–159.Google Scholar
• Maier G (1993) The spatial search problem: Structure and complexity. Geographical Anal. 25(3):242–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF, Lerman S (1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 45(8):1977–1988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF, McFadden D (1981) Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis. Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Chapter 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Maskell P (2001) The firm in economic geography. Econom. Geography 77(4):329–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, eds. Frontiers in Econometrics, Chapter 4 (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Meyer R (1980) A descriptive model of constrained residential search. Geographical Anal. 12(1):21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michelson W (1979) Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller HJ (1993) Modeling strategies for the spatial search problem. Papers Regional Sci. 72(1):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller HJ (1994) Probability based models of spatial search. Environment Planning A 26(3):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller HJ, Finco MV (1995) Spatial search and spatial competition: A probability analysis of basic results from the spatially-restricted theory. Ann. Regional Sci. 29(1):67–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1994) The dynamics of evolving markets: The effects of business sales and age dissolutions and divestiture. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4):575–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W, Shaver JM (2004) Who buys what? How integration capability affects acquisition incidence and target choice. Strategic Organ. 1(2):171–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):623–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morosini P, Shane S, Singh H (1998) National cultural distance and cross border acquisition performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 29(1):137–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narula SC, Lentek B, Harwitz M (1987) A contextual analysis of the journey-to-shop with price uncertainty. J. Regional Sci. 27(3):403–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly R (2005) Industry Surveys: Chemicals (Standard & Poor’s, New York).Google Scholar
• Pablo AL (1994) Determinants of acquisition integration level—A decision-making perspective. Acad. Management J. 37(4):803–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palm R (1976a) Real estate agents and geographic information. Geographical Rev. 66(3):266–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palm R (1976b) The role of real estate agents as information mediators in two American cities. Geografiska Annaler B 58(1):28–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Perrings C, Hannon B (2001) An introduction to spatial discounting. J. Regional Sci. 41(1):23–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf M, Shanley M (1997) Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters T (1997) The Circle of Innovation: You Can’t Shrink Your Way to Greatness (Alfred A. Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Petersen M (2004) Information: Hard and soft. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Philips L (1988) The Economics of Imperfect Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Pritchett P (1985) After the Merger: Managing the Shock Waves (Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
• Ratchford BT (1980) The value of information for selected appliances. J. Marketing Res. 17(1):14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratchford BT (1982) Cost-benefit models for explaining consumer choice and information seeking behavior. Management Sci. 28(2):197–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Reuer J, Ragozzino R (2008) Adverse selection and M&A design: The roles of alliances and IPOs. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(2):195–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose A, Zademach H-M (2003) Rising metropoli: The geography of mergers and acquisitions in Germany. Urban Stud. 40(10):1895–1923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson P (1990) Spatial search for the lowest price. Geographical Anal. 22(4):336–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson P, MacKinnon RD (1981) A Geographical Model of Job Search, Migration, and Unemployment (State University of New York, Buffalo).Google Scholar
• Rose PS (1999) Diversification in interstate banking: The search for related performance profiles between acquiring and acquired banking firms expanding across state lines. Managerial Finance 25(7):66–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PH (1995) Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Rugman A (1981) Inside the Multinational: The Economics of Internal Markets (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rumelt R (1987) Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. Teece D, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 137–158.Google Scholar
• Salter MS, Weinhold WA (1981) Choosing compatible acquisitions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59(1):117–127.Google Scholar
• Shen JC, Reuer J (2005) Adverse selection in acquisitions of small manufacturing firms: A comparison of public with private targets. Small Bus. Econom. 24(4):393–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrivastava P (1986) Postmerger integration. J. Bus. Strategy 7(1):65–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H (1957) Models of Man (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon H (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sleuwaegen L (1998) Cross border mergers and EC competition policy. World Econom. 21(8):1077–1096.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischoff B, Litchenstein S (1977) Behavioral decision theory. Annual Rev. Psych. 28:1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith TR, Clark WAV, Huff JO, Shapiro P (1979) A decision making and search model for intraurban migration. Geographical Anal. 11:1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Baum JAC (2003) Geography and strategy: The strategic management of space and place. Sorenson O, Baum JAC, eds. Geography and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management Vol. 20) (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital financing. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stalk G, Hout TM (1990) Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets (Free Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stimson RJ (1982) The Australian City: A Welfare Geography (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, VIC, Australia).Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003a) Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003b) The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res. Policy 32(2):229–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, ed (1987) Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Tihanyi L, Johnson RA, Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA (2003) Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Acad. Management J. 46(2):195–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermans H (1980) Consumer spatial choice strategies: A comparative study of some alternative behavioural spatial shopping models. Geoforum 11(2):123–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit regions. Econom. Geography 46(2):234–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautwein F (1990) Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Strategic Management J. 11(4):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 171–222.Google Scholar
• Tyler B, Steensma HK (1998) The effects of executives experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances. Strategic Management J. 19(10):939–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006) Career guide to industries: Chemical manufacturing. Accessed March 21, 2006, http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs008.htm.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2002) Manufacturing: Summary series—General summary: Industry statistics for industry groups and industries: 2002 American FactFinder Table EC0231SG102, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. http://factfinder2.census.gov.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weston JF, Mitchell ML, Mulherin JH (2004) Takeovers, Restructuring and Corporate Governance (Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Manski CF (1989) The logit model and response-based samples. Sociol. Methods Res. 17(3):283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yunker JA (1983) Integrating Acquisitions: Making Corporate Marriages Work (Praeger, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar