Dared to Care: Organizational Vulnerability, Institutional Logics, and MNCs’ Social Responsiveness in Emerging Markets

References

• Ahmadjian CL, Robinson P (2001) Downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):622–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amenta E (2006) When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anonymous (2008) One stingy relief contributions list: Chinese people should support domestic products. Guba.com.cn (discussion forum), May 16, http://guba.eastmoney.com/look,1000600030,10001005388788.html.Google Scholar
• Atkinson L, Galaskiewicz J (1988) Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(1):82–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):7–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP, Diermeier D (2007) Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(3):599–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T, Child C (2008) Shaming the corporation: Globalization, reputation, and the dynamics of anti-corporate movements. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Beamish P, Bapuji H (2008) Toy recalls and China: Emotion vs. evidence. Management Organ. Rev. 4(2):197–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier JM, Jones BS (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Pavelin S (2005) Corporate community contributions in the United Kingdom and the United States. J. Bus. Ethics 56(1):15–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Safford S (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):460–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapple W, Moon J (2005) Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Bus. Soc. 44(4):415–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S (2008) International iron rooster list. Bbs.cnfol.com (discussion forum), May 17, http://post.cnfol.com/guba,002186,2583032.html. [Accessed July 17, 2008; site now discontinued.].Google Scholar
• Chen S-FS, Hennart J-F (2002) Japanese investors’ choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chinese Academy of Social Science (2005) The 2005 surey on Internet usage and effects in five Chinese cities. [In Chinese.]. Report, CASS, Beijing, http://news3.xinhuanet.com/newmedia/2005-07/08/content_3191503.htm.Google Scholar
• Christmann P (2004) Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environment policy standardization. Acad. Management J. 47(5):747–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA (2000) Empirical research on the deterrence effect of environmental monitoring and enforcement. Environ. Law Reporter 30(4):10245–10252.Google Scholar
• Currall SC, Epstein MJ (2003) The fragility of organizational trust: Lessons from the rise and fall of Enron. Organ. Dynam. 32(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Goodstein J, Scott WR (2002) Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Acad. Management J. 45(1):43–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Greve HR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN (2005) Social Movements and Organizational Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• den Hond F, de Bakker FGA (2007) Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):901–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl J, Schussman A (2003) The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision-making. Res. Soc. Movements, Conflicts Change 24:155–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Lenox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management J. 27(8):765–781.Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Fry LW, Keim GD, Meiners RE (1982) Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit?. Acad. Management J. 25(1):94–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamson W, Croteau D, Hoynes W, Sasson T (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Rev. Sociol. 18:373–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardberg NA, Fombrun CJ (2006) Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):329–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo S, Fraser MW (2010) Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Application (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the emergence of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Imbens G, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, Wright M (2000) Strategies in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. 43(3):249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou J (2008) Company public relations crises caused by disaster relief. China Econom. Forum 20:36–37.Google Scholar
• Huang M, Li XL, Zhu HW (2008) An analysis of the phenomenon why firms were “forced to donate”: Were the general public “unreasonable” or the firms “without conscience”?. Management World 10:115–126.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance 55(2):867–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Pearce NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extrainstitutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry model. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 19(3):411–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24:308–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lines VL (2004) Corporate reputation in Asia: Looking beyond bottom-line performance. J. Comm. Management 8(3):233–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C (2008) Survey suggests that Sichuan earthquake awakens Chinese firms’ sense of corporate social responsibility. [In Chinese.]. China News (July 19), http://www.chinanews.com.cn/cj/gncj/news/2008/07-19/1317938.shtml.Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2001) Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo S (2008) Barret visited Chengdu six times and Intel donated 4,800 million for reconstruction. Huaxi Dishi Bao (June 24), http://tech.sina.com.cn/it/2008-06-24/13512279839.shtml.Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2006) Opportunism in inter-firm exchanges in emerging markets. Management Organ. Rev. 2(1):121–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Chung C-N, Sobczak M (2009) How do corporate governance model differences affect foreign direct investment in emerging economies?. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(October):444–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maignan I, Ralston DA (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33(3):497–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden C (2000) The new corporate citizenship of big business: Part of the solution to sustainability?. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(1):9–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):404–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D, Scott RW (2005) Organizations and movements. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott RW, Zald M, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 4–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, eds. (1996) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Structures, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C (2001) Dynamics of Contention (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinnis A, Pellegrin J, Shum Y, Teo J, Wu J (2009) The Sichuan earthquake and the changing landscape of CSR in China. Knowledge@Wharton (April 20), http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2213.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) Continuities in the theory of reference groups and social structure. Merton RK, eds. Social Theory and Social Struture (Free Press, New York), 335–440.Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller A, Whiteman G (2009) Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response: A study of Fortune Global 500 firms. J. Bus. Ethics 84(4):589–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Rourke D (2005) Market movements: Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. J. Indust. Ecol. 9(1–2):115–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park SH, Luo YD (2001) Guanxi and organizational dynamics, organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management J. 22(5):455–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasquero J (1991) Trends in international philanthropy. Paul K, eds. Contemporary Issues in Business and Society in the United States and Abroad (Edwin Mellon Press, Lewiston, NY), 225–257.Google Scholar
• Polanyi K (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Rinehart, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(12):56–68.Google Scholar
• Procter & Gamble (2008) P&G China home page. Accessed July 9, 2008, http://www.pg.com.cn/.Google Scholar
• Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15:29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Sivakumar K (1999) Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organ. Sci. 10(1):27–42.Link, Google Scholar
• Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roner L (2005) Corporate America to the rescue. Ethical Corporation (November):20–21.Google Scholar
• Sanders WMG, Tuschke A (2007) The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Acad. Management J. 50(1):33–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Securities Times (2008) The executives of MNCs were very frustrated. (June 10), http://www.cnad.com/html/Article/2008/0610/20080610161756250.shtml.Google Scholar
• Soule SA (2009) Contentious and Private Politics and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Epstein LD (2000) What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):523–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, eds. Handbook of Organizations (Rand-McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Strang D, Jung D (2005) Organizational change as an orchestrated social movement: Recruitment to a corporate quality initiative. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 280–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Galunic DC (1996) Consequences of public scrutiny for leaders and their organizations. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 18 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 201–250.Google Scholar
• Swanson DL (1995) Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarrow S (1996) States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 41–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilly C (1984) Social movements and national politics. Bright C, Harding S, eds. Statemaking and Social Movements: Essays in History and Theory (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), 297–317.Google Scholar
• Torres-Baumgarten G, Yucetepe V (2009) Multinational firms’ leadership role in CSR in Latin America. J. Bus. Ethics 85(1, Supplement):217–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van De Ven WPMM, Van Praag BMS (1981) The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. J. Econometrics 17(2):229–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vernon R (1998) In the Hurricane’s Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprise (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Visser W (2008) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 473–499.Google Scholar
• Vogel D (2005) The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility (Brookings Institution Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walmart China (2008) Walmart donated more than 17 million again. Accessed July 17, 2008, http://www.wal-martchina.com/news/2008/20080503.htm.Google Scholar
• Wang BF (2006a) Review of discussion on corporate social responsibility. Econom. Theory Econom. Management 12:72–76.Google Scholar
• Wang ZL, ed. (2005) Report of Transnational Corporations in China (China Economic Publishing House, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Wang ZL, ed. (2006b) Report of Transnational Corporations in China (China Economic Publishing House, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Wang ZL, ed. (2007) Report of Transnational Corporations in China (China Economic Publishing House, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Wang ZL, ed. (2008) Report of Transnational Corporations in China (China Economic Publishing House, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Yin YJ (2008) CSR puzzles: The reflection of CSR of Chinese firms. Computer World (October 13), 22–25.Google Scholar
• Wang ZL, ed (2009) Report of Transnational Corporations in China (China Economic Publishing House, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitment, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad. Management J. 42(5):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Soderstrom SB (2011) Social movements, business and the environment. Bansal P, Hoffman AJ, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 248–265.Google Scholar
• Weber K, Rao H, Thomas LG (2009) From streets to suites: How the antibiotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welford R (2005) Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America, and Asia. J. Corporate Citizenship 17(Spring):33–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiu L (2008) Why should we donate?. Yingxiao Xueyuan 6:83.Google Scholar
• Zald MN, Morrill C, Rao H (2005) The impact of social movements on organizations: Environment and responses. Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald MN, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 253–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Zhu J, Yue H, Zhu C (2010) Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. J. Bus. Ethics 91(1):51–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zitengju (2008) http://www.zitengju.cn/JingDianWenZhang/DaQianShiJie/2008/5/0D0BI2F202.html. [Accessed July 17, 2008: site now discontinued.].Google Scholar