An Advantage of Newness: Vicarious Learning Despite Limited Absorptive Capacity

References

• Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A (1963) Reliability of progress curves in airframe production. Econometrica 31(4):679–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appleyard MM (1996) How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter):137–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Ingram P (1998) Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. 44(7):996–1016.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Li SX, Usher JM (2000) Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):766–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN (2003) The economic effects of technological progress: Evidence from the banking industry. J. Money Credit Banking 35(2):141–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Davis JP (2012) Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Management J. 55(3):611–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corredoira RA, Rosenkopf L (2010) Should auld acquaintance be forgot? The reverse transfer of knowledge through mobility ties. Strategic Management J. 31(2):159–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA (2004) From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.Link, Google Scholar
• Eeckhout J, Jovanovic B (2002) Knowledge spillovers and inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1290–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S, Zhu D (2008) Performance effects of imitative entry. Strategic Management J. 29(8):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S, Kale P, Krishnan MS, Singh JV (2005) Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management J. 26(1) 25–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Kyle M, Cockburn IM, Henderson R (2006) Public and Private Spillovers, Location and the Productivity of Pharmaceutical Research (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M, Kogut B (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2005) Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organ. Stud. 26(7):1025–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1998) R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P, Beckman C (1998) When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):815–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre–history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herriott SR, Levinthal DA, March JG (1985) Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):298–302.Google Scholar
• Hoopes DG, Postrel S (1999) Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance. Strategic Management J. 20(9):837–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Simons T (2002) The transfer of experience in groups of organizations: Implications for performance and competition. Management Sci. 48(12):1517–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Keeble D, Wilkinson F (1999) Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Stud. 33(4):295–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Posen HE (2005) Is failure good?. Strategic Management J. 26(7):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Posen HE, Wu B (2009) Spillover asymmetry and why it matters. Management Sci. 55(3):373–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Reiss PC (1988) Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):538–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB (1984) The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):213–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1996) Learning to be risk averse. Psych. Rev. 103(2):309–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J, Olsen JP (1975) The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur. J. Political Res. 3(2):147–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mester LJ (1993) Efficiency in the savings and loan industry. J. Banking Finance 17(2–3):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Haunschild PR (1995) Population-level learning. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews Vol. 17 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 115–166.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm–The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Yen CJ, Mahoney JT (2012) Exploring the problem-finding and problem-solving approach for designing organizations. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):52–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Zemsky PB (2012) Some like it free: Innovators’ strategic use of disclosure to slow down competition. Strategic Management J. 33(7):773–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Lee J, Yi S (2013) The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Saunders A, Cornett MM (2003) Financial Institutions Management: A Risk Management Approach (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1996) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwab A (2007) Incremental organizational learning from multilevel information sources: Evidence for cross-level interactions. Organ. Sci. 18(2):233–251.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon DH, Lieberman MB (2010) Internal and external influences on adoption decisions in multi-unit firms: The moderating effect of experience. Strategic Organ. 8(2):132–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1):101–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Organizations and social structure. March JG, eds. Handbook of Organizations (Rand-McNally, Chicago), 153–193.Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Tyre MJ (1995) How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Res. Policy 24(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.Link, Google Scholar
• Zahra S, Ireland R, Hitt M (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad. Management J. 43(5):925–950.Crossref, Google Scholar