On Becoming (Un)Committed: A Taxonomy and Test of Newcomer Onboarding Scenarios

References

• Abbott A (1990) A primer on sequence methods. Organ. Sci. 1(4):375–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Abrams D, Hogg MA, Marques JM, eds. (2005) The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Adkins CL (1995) Previous work experience and organizational socialization: A longitudinal examination. Acad. Management J. 38(3):839–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen NJ, Meyer JP (1996) Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. J. Vocational Behav. 49(3):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Ostroff C (1997) Selection as socialization. Anderson N, Herriot P, eds. International Handbook of Selection and Assessment (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 413–440.Google Scholar
• Andruff H, Carraro N, Thompson A, Gaudreau P, Louvet B (2009) Latent class growth modeling: A tutorial. Tutorials Quant. Meth. Psych. 5(1):11–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angle HL, Perry JL (1981) An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE (2012) The role of time in socialization dynamics. Wanberg C, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Socialization (Oxford University Press, New York), 161–186.Google Scholar
• Avital M (2000) Dealing with time in social inquiry: A tension between method and lived experience. Organ. Sci. 11(6):665–673.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker EH, Feldman DC (1990) Strategies of organizational socialization and their impact on newcomer adjustment. J. Management Issues 2(2):198–212.Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA, Rockmann KW (2010) Chutes versus ladders: Anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS (2007) Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):707–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Weiss HM (2003) Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 6(4):440–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentein K, Vandenberg RJ, Vandenberghe C, Stinglhamber F (2005) The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. J. Appl. Psych. 90(3):468–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E (2003) Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Rev. Psych. 54:579–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borsboom D (2006) The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika 71(3):425–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boswell WR, Tichy J, Boudreau JW (2005) The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effect. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):882–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boswell WR, Shipp AJ, Culbertson SS, Payne SC (2009) Changes in newcomer job satisfaction over time: Examining the pattern of honeymoons and hangovers. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):844–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bozdogan H (1987) Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52(3):345–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan B (1974) The socialization of managers and work organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(4):533–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2000) Decay functions. Soc. Networks 22(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2001) Attachment, decay, and social network. J. Organ. Behav. 22(6):619–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2002) Bridge decay. Soc. Networks 24(4):333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantrill H (1965) The Pattern of Human Concerns (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Caplow T (1964) Principles of Organization (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York).Google Scholar
• Celeux G, Soromenho G (1996) An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J. Classification 13(2):195–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D, Schmitt N (2000) Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adjustment. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):190–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang JY, Choi JN (2007) The dynamic relation between organizational and professional commitment of highly educated research and development (R&D) professionals. J. Soc. Psych. 147(3):299–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1991) Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):459–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chia R (2007) Essai: Thirty years on: From organizational structures to the organization of thought. Organ. Stud. 18(4):685–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen A (2007) Commitment before and after: An evaluation and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Res. Management Rev. 17(3):336–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Freund A (2005) A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between multiple commitments and withdrawal cognitions. Scand J. Management 21(3):329–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole DA, Maxwell SE (2003) Testing meditational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J. Abnormal Psych. 112(4):558–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins LM (2006) Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Rev. Psych. 57:505–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper JT, Stanley LJ, Klein H, Tenhiälä A (2012) Profiles of commitment in alternative work arrangements. Proc. 2012 Acad. Management Annual Meeting, Boston.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, Reed L (1987) Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. J. Nervous Mental Disease 175(9):537–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalal RS, Lam H, Weiss HM, Welch ER, Hulin CL (2009) A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Acad. Management J. 52(5):1051–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis RV, Lofquist LH (1984) A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Diener E, Diener C (1996) Most people are happy. Psych. Sci. 7(3):181–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Strycker LA (2006) An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Roberts LM, Bednar J (2010) Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):265–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farkas A-J, Tetrick L-E (1989) A three-wave longitudinal analysis of the causal ordering of satisfaction and commitment on turnover decisions. J. Appl. Psych. 74(6):855–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulconer JE, Williams RN (1985) Temporality in human action. Amer. Psych. 40(11):1179–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman DC (1981) The multiple socialization of organization members. Acad. Management Rev. 6(2):309–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman M, Levinthal DA (1991) Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence and organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2):442–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fraley RC, Roberts BW (2005) Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across a life course. Psych. Rev. 112(1):60–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller JA, Fisher GG, Jeffrey MS, Spitsmüller C, Russell SS, Smith PC (2003) A lengthy look at the daily grind: Time series analysis of events, mood, stress, and satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 88(6):1019–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner CR, Day DV (1997) A meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. J. Appl. Psych. 82(6):827–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Price KN, Hamilton AL, Thomas JB (2010) Forging an identity: An insider–outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleick J (1987) Chaos: Making a New Science (Viking, New York).Google Scholar
• Griffeth RW, Hom PW (2001) Retaining Valued Employees (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1346–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heady B, Wearing A (1992) Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-Being (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, VIC, Australia).Google Scholar
• Hofmans J, Theuns P, Van Acker F (2009) Combining quality and quantity. A psychometric evaluation of the self-anchoring scale. Qual. Quant. 43(5):703–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland JL (1973) Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Barbulescu R (2010) Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):135–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irving P, Meyer JP (1994) Reexamination of the met-expectations hypothesis: A longitudinal analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 79(6):937–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jokisaari M, Nurmi J-E (2009) Change in newcomers’ supervisor support and socialization outcomes after organizational entry. Acad. Management J. 52(3):527–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BL, Nagin DS (2007) Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and a, SAS procedure for estimating them. Soc. Methods Res. 35(4):542–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung T, Wickrama KAS (2008) An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 2(1):302–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Wanberg CR, Glomb TM, Ahlburg D (2005) The role of temporal shifts in turnover process: It’s about time. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):644–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R (1980) Time and work: Toward an integrative perspective. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 2 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 81–127.Google Scholar
• Klein HJ, Molloy JC, Brinsfield CT (2012) Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):130–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ (2009) Editorial. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer M (2010) Organizational Socialization: Joining and Leaving Organizations (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psych. 58(2):281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ, Self RM (2000) Latent growth models of individual change: The case of newcomer adjustment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(1):107–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Ashford SJ, Walsh JP, Mowday RT (1992) Commitment propensity, organizational commitment, and voluntary turnover: A longitudinal study of organizational entry processes. J. Management 18(1):15–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1936) Principles of Topological Psychology (McGraw Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1951) Cartwright D, eds. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (Harpers, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Maier G, Brunstein JC (2001) The role of personal work goals in newcomers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A longitudinal analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 86(5):1034–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Hau K-T (2007) Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemp. Ed. Psych. 32(1):151–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Nagengast B, Morin AJ (2013) Measurement invariance of Big-Five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and La Dolce Vita effects. Dev. Psych. 49(6):1194–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Tschan F (2004) Temporal Matters in Social Psychology: Examining the Role of Time in the Lives of Groups and Individuals (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinney JC (1969) Typification, typologies, and sociological theory. Soc. Forces 48(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLachlan G, Peel D (2000) Finite Mixture Models (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ (1988) Links between work experiences and organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal analysis. J. Occupational Psych. 61(3):195–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Irving P, Allen NJ (1998) Examination of the combined effects of work values and early work experiences on organizational commitment. J. Organ. Behav. 19(1):29–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsksy L (2002) Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocational Behav. 61(1):20–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R (2010) A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J. Management 36(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel AA (2007) A distributed cognition perspective on newcomers’ change processes: The management of cognitive uncertainty in two investment banks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):507–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (2007) Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research. Strategic Organ. 5(2):175–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr LB (1982) Explaining Organizational Behavior (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Monge PR (1990) Theoretical and analytical issues in studying organizational processes. Organ. Sci. 1(4):406–430.Link, Google Scholar
• Morin AJS, Morizot J, Boudrias J-S, Madore I (2011a) A multi-foci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture of analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 14(1):58–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morin AJS, Maïano C, Nagengast B, Marsh HW, Morizot J, Janosz M (2011b) General growth mixture analysis of adolescents developmental trajectories of anxiety: The impact of untested invariance assumptions on substantive interpretations. Struct. Equation Model. 18(4):613–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2002) Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrow P (2011) Managing organizational commitment: Insights from longitudinal research. J. Vocatonal Behav. 79(1):18–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM (1982) Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2010) Mplus User’s Guide, version 6 (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Nagin DS (1999) Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psych. Methods 4(2):139–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagin DS (2005) Group-Based Modeling of Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson DL (1987) Organizational socialization: A stress perspective. J. Occupational Behav. 8(4):311–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholson N (1984) A theory of work role transitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(2):172–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Model. 14(4):535–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostroff C, Kozlowski SWJ (1992) Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psych. 45(4):849–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons T (1951) The Social System (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Petras H, Masyn K (2010) General growth mixture analysis with antecedents and consequences of change. Piquero AR, Weisburd D, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Criminology (Springer, New York), 69–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piaget J (1985) The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development (University of Chicago Press, Chicago). [Orig. pub. 1975. L’equilibration des structures cognitives: Problème central du développement (Presses universitaires de France, Paris).].Google Scholar
• Porter LW, Crampon WJ, Smith FJ (1976) Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 15(1):87–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (1991) The New Institutionalism and Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prigogine L, Stengers I (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature (Bantam, New York).Google Scholar
• Querishi I, Fang Y (2011) Socialization in open source software projects: A growth mixture modeling approach. Organ. Res. Methods 14(1):208–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichers AE (1987) An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates. Acad. Management Rev. 12(2):278–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson SL, Rousseau DM (1994) Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. J. Organ. Behav. 15(3):245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roe RA (2008) Time in applied psychology: The study of “what happens” rather than “what is.”. Eur. Psych. 13(1):37–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roe RA, Gockel C, Meyer B (2012) Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 21(5):629–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Ashforth BE (2002) Is job search related to employment quality? It all depends on the fit. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):646–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):338–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein EH (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Schmitt N, Oswald FL, Friede A, Imus A, Merritt S (2008) Perceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 72(3):317–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Goldstein HW, Smith DB (1995) The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psych. 48(4):747–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2):461–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership and Administration (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Jansen KJ (2011) Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in media res. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):76–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sokal RR (1974) Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects. Science 185(4157):1115–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solinger ON, Van Olffen W, Roe RA (2008) Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):70–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solinger ON, Hofmans J, Van Olffen W (2012) Winning hearts and minds: The dynamic interplay of commitment processes. Working paper, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Ross J (1985) Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. J. Appl. Psych. 70(3):469–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence. Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thelen E, Smith LB (1994) A Dynamic System Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Thompson M (2011) Ontological shift or ontological drift: Reality claims, epistemological frameworks and theory generation in organization studies. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):754–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tisak J, Tisak MS (2000) Permanency and ephemerality of psychological measures with application to organizational commitment. Psych. Methods 5(2):175–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. 13(5):567–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (2005) Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organ. Stud. 26(9):1377–1404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Geert P (1994) Dynamic Systems of Development: Change Between Complexity and Chaos (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York).Google Scholar
• Van Geert P (1998) A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Develop. Rev. 105(4):634–677.Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1975) Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(2):207–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Schein E (1979) Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 209–264.Google Scholar
• Vandenberg RJ, Seo JH (1992) Placing recruitment effectiveness into perspective: A cognitive explication of the job-choice and organizational entry period. Human Res. Management Rev. 2(4):239–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wang M, Hanges PJ (2011) Latent class procedures: Applications to organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 14(1):24–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanous JP, Poland TD, Premack SL, Davis KS (1992) The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 77(3):288–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sense Making in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Weiss HM (1978) Social learning of work values in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 63(6):711–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer S, Albert S, Zaheer A (1999) Time scales and organizational theory. Acad. Management J. 24(4):725–741.Google Scholar
• Zhao HAO, Wayne SJ, Glibkowski BC, Bravo J (2007) The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. 60(3):647–680.Crossref, Google Scholar