How Paris Gave Rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and Fragmentation in Radical Innovation

References

• Ackerman J (1969) The demise of the avant garde: Notes on the sociology of recent American art. Comparative Stud. Soc. History 11:371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen W (2002) Picasso’s Brothel: Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (Other Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Antliff M, Leighten P (2001) Cubism and Culture (Thames & Hudson, London).Google Scholar
• Appel D (1970) Market segmentation. A response to retail innovation. J. Marketing 34:64–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Assouline P (1988) L’Homme de l’art: D.-H. Kahnweiler, 1884–1979 (Balland, Paris).Google Scholar
• Axelrod R, Cohen M (2000) Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Barr A (1946) Picasso: 50 Years of His Art (Museum of Modern Art, New York).Google Scholar
• Baxandall M (1985) Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Becker H (1982) Art Worlds (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Berger J (1989) The Success and Failure of Picasso (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Bidou H (1910) Les Salons de 1910. Gazette des Beaux-Arts (May) 47.Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100:992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (1987) Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 92:1287–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110:349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabanne P (2000) L’Épopée du Cubisme (Les Editions de l’Amateur, Paris).Google Scholar
• Campbell D (1960) Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psych. Rev. 67:380–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G, Hannan M (1989) Density dependence in the evolution of populations of newspaper organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 54:524–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19:824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Caves R (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Centola D, Willer R, Macy M (2005) The emperor’s dilemma: A computational model of self-enforcing norms. Amer. J. Sociol. 110:1009–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charle C (1990) Naissance des “intellectuels”: 1880–1900 (Minuit, Paris).Google Scholar
• Chipp HB (1955) Cubism, 1907–1914. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Chipp HB (1984) Theories of Modern Art: A Sourcebook by Artists and Critics (University of California Press, Berkeley). [Orig. pub. 1968.].Google Scholar
• Clemens E, Cook J (1999) Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:441–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Collins R (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (Belknap Press, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
• Constant EW (1980) The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Cooper D (1970) The Cubist Epoch (Phaidon Press, London).Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Tinterow G (1984) The Essential Cubism: Braque, Picasso and Their Friends (George Braziller, New York).Google Scholar
• Coser L (1965) Men of Ideas: A Sociologist’s View (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cottington D (1998) Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Avant-Garde and Politics in Paris, 1905–1914 (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Cottington D (2004) Cubism and Its Histories (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).Google Scholar
• Cowling E (2002) Picasso: Style and Meaning (Phaidon Press, London).Google Scholar
• Cox N (2000) Cubism (Phaidon Press, London).Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Behrens DM (2005) When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res. Policy 34:717–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djelic M-L, Quack S (2007) Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory Soc. 36:161–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel M (1967) Frank Lloyd Wright and Cubism: A study in ambiguity. Amer. Quart. 19:24–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eysenck H (1993) Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psych. Inquiry 4:147–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald MC (1992) Skin games. Art America 80:71–83, 139–341.Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald MC (1996) Making Modernism: Picasso and the Creation of the Market for Twentieth-century Art (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Friedkin N (1998) A Structural Theory of Social Influence (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fry EF (1966) Cubism (Thames & Hudson, London).Google Scholar
• Galenson D (2009) Conceptual Revolutions in Twentieth-century Art (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Karnøe P (2001) Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. Garud R, Karnøe P, eds. Path Dependence and Creation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 1–40.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Karnøe P (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 32:277–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Golding J (1968) Cubism: A History and an Analysis, 1907–1914 (Boston Book and Art Shop, Boston).Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Acad. Management J. 49:27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton R (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargrave TJ, Van de Ven AH (2006) A collective action model of institutional innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 4:864–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Rao H (1997) Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 102:1606–1651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C, Rothaermel F (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 28:257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodin JP (1967) The aesthetics of modern art. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 26:181–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz M, Moore J (2002) Executive migration and institutional change. Acad. Management J. 45:120–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuran T (1995) The inevitability of future revolutionary surprises. Amer. J. Sociol. 100:1528–1551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lachmann R (2000) Capitalists in Spite of Themselves (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32:923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampel J, Lant T, Shamsie J (2000) Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organ. Sci. 11:263–269.Link, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ (2002) Social structure and organizations revisited. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations Vol. 19 (Emerald Publishers, Bingley, UK), 3–36.Google Scholar
• Macy M, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:143–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Amer. J. Sociol. 77:9–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metzinger J, Gleizes A (1912) Du Cubisme (Figuiere, Paris).Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83:340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6:585–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Orbell J, Zeng L, Mulford M (1996) Individual experience and the fragmentation of societies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61:1018–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orwicz M (1991) Anti-Americanism and state power in the early third republic. Art History 14:571–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett J, Ansell C (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98:1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett J, McLean P (2006) Organizational invention and elite transformation: The birth of partnership systems in Renaissance Florence. Amer. J. Sociol. 111:1463–1568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28:89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson J, Carson S (2000) Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality Individual Differences 28:323–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2011) Jazz and the disconnected: City structural disconnectedness and the emergence of a jazz canon, 1897–1933. Amer. J. Sociol. 117:420–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plattner S (1998) A most ingenious paradox: The market for contemporary fine art. Amer. Anthropol. 100:482–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98:829–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108:795–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards R (2004) A fitness model of evaluation. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 62:263–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1983) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin W (1989a) Picasso and Braque: A Symposium (Museum of Modern Art, New York).Google Scholar
• Rubin W (1989b) Picasso and Braque: Pioneering Cubism (Museum of Modern Art, New York).Google Scholar
• Salmon A (1911) Pablo Picasso. Paris J. (September 21) .Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven C, Romanelli E (2001) Emergent themes and the next wave of entrepreneurship research. Schoonhoven C, Romanelli E, eds. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic: Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 383–408.Google Scholar
• Scott RW (2004) Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 30:1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV (2010) The explosive rise of a political party: The logic of sudden convergence. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 26:639–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2004) Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2007) The creative process in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Res. J. 19:329–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorlin P (1969) La Société Française Volume 1: 1840–1914 (Artaud, Paris).Google Scholar
• Tournier P (1910) Les Salons d’Automne. Pan 3(November–December): Article 11.Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31:439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vauxcelles L (1911) Les Salons de 1911. Touche-à-Tout 5:443–444.Google Scholar
• Wan W, Chiu C-Y (2002) Effects of novel conceptual combination on creativity. J. Creative Behav. 36:227–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wartofsky M (1993) The politics of art: The domination of style and the crisis in contemporary art. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 51:217–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• White HC, White CA (1965) Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Wijnberg NM, Gemser G (2000) Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts. Organ. Sci. 11:323–329.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson S (1983) What Is Cubism? (Tate Gallery Publishing, London).Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. J. Sociol. 42:726–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104:1398–1439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Sgourev SV (2006) Peer capitalism: Parallel relationships in the U.S. economy. Amer. J. Sociol. 111:1327–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar