Defining Who You Are By What You're Not: Organizational Disidentification and The National Rifle Association

References

  • Abrams D., Hogg M. A.Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances (1990) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Abrams D., Hogg M. A.Social Identity and Social Cognition (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Adler P. A., Adler P. Intense loyalty in organizations: A case study of college athletics. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33:401–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:20–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107:238–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Bonnett D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88:588–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergami M., Bagozzi R. P. Self-categorization, affective commitment, and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British J. Soc. Psych. (2000) 39:555–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya C. B., Elsbach K. D. The individual and the organization: Understanding the Roles of Identification and disidentification in social marketing. Innovations in Soc. Marketing Conf. (1997) . Paper presented at theGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya C. B., Rao H., Glynn M. A. Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. J. Marketing (1995) 59:46–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branscombe N. R., Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B., Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B. The context and content of social identity threat. Social Identity (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford U.K.) 35–58Google Scholar
  • Brewer M. B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Social Psych. Bull. (1991) 17:475–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B., Gardner W. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. J. Personality Social Psych. (1996) 71:83–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B., Kramer R. M. The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. (1985) 36:219–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Wisenfeld B. M., Martin C. L. Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors“ reactions to job layoffs. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1995) 63:59–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown M. W., Cudeck R., Bollen Kenneth A., Long J. Scott. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models (1993) (Newbury Park, Sage, CA) 136–162Google Scholar
  • Brown R. J., Williams J. A. Group identification: The same thing to all people? Human Relations (1984) 37:547–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burnett J. NRA continues strong anti-government stance. All Things onsidered (1995) . National Public Radio (May 13)Google Scholar
  • Cheney G. On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Comm. Monographs (1983) 50:342–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B.Influence. The new psychology of modern persuasion (1984) (Quill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Giacalone R.A., Rosenfeld P. Indirect tactics of image management: Beyond basking. Impression Management in the Organization (1989) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 45–56Google Scholar
  • Crocker J., Gallo L.Prejudice against outgroups: The self-enhancing effects of downward social comparisons (1985) . Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA, AugustGoogle Scholar
  • Deschamps J. C., Doise W., Tajfel H. Crossed category memberships in intergroup relations. Differentiation Between Social Groups (1978) (Academic Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Dillman D. A.Mail and Telephone Surveys (1977) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Doise W., Deschamps J. C., Meyer G., Tajfel H. The accentuation of contra-category similarities. Differentiation Between Social Groups (1978) (Academic Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:514–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dukerich J. M., Kramer R., McLean Parks J., Whetten D. A., Godfrey P. C. The dark side of organizational identification. Identity in Organizations. Building Theory Through Conversations (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 245–256Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:239–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Building theory from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B.Social Identity (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Staw B. M., Sutton R. I. An expanded model of organizational identification. Research in Organizational Behavior (1999) 21:163–200Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., John Wagner. Coping with hybrid organizational identities: Evidence from California legislative staff. Advances in Qualitative Organizational Research (2001) 3(Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, U.K.) 59–90Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Kramer R. M. Members“ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:442–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:699–738CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) (McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(February):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox H. L. Who needs corporate brands? Marketing (1998) . (August 3)Google Scholar
  • Gerard H. B., Mathewson G. C. The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication. J. Experiment. Social Psych. (1966) 2:278–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Sims H. P., Gioia D. A. Symbols, scripts, and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizational experience. The Thinking Organization (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 49–74Google Scholar
  • Goethals G. R., Messick D. M., Allison S.T., Suls J., Wills T.A. The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research (1991) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 149–176Google Scholar
  • Hall D. T., Schneider B. Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organizational type. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:340–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayduk L.Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances (1987) (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Heider F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. (1958) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins E. T., Kuiper N. A., Olson J. M., Higgins E. T., Herman C. P., Zanna M. P. Social cognition: A need to get personal. Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (1981) 1(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hinkle S., Taylor L., Fox-Cardamone A., Crook K. F. Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multi-component approach. British J. Soc. Psych. (1989) 28:305–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Abrams D.Social identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (1988) (Routledge, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., McGarty C., Abrams D., Hogg M. A. Self-categorization and social identity. Social Identity Theory (1990) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 10–27Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Mullin B. A., Abrams D., Hogg M. A. Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and social identification. Social Identity and Social Cognition (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.) 249–279Google Scholar
  • Hu L. T., Bentler P. M., Rick H. Hoyle. Evaluating model fit. Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 76–99Google Scholar
  • Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink (1972) . Houghton-MifflinGoogle Scholar
  • Joreskog K. G. Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika (1971) 36:109–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joreskog K. G., Dag Sorbom. Windows LISREL 8.14 (1993) (Scientific Software International, Inc, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Murnighan J. Keith. Cooperation and organizational identification. Social Psychology in Organizations (1993) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 244–268Google Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B. Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J. Personality Social Psych. (1984) 46:1044–1057CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B., Wilke H., Messick D., Rutte C. Social group identity and the emergence of cooperation in esource conservation dilemmas. Experimental Studies of Social Dilemmas (1986) (Verlag-Peter Lang, Frankfurt, Germany) 205–234Google Scholar
  • Linville P. W., Jones E. E. Polarize appraisals of outgroup members. J. Personality Social Psych. (1980) 38:689–703CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Long J. S.Confirmatory Factor Analysis. A Preface to LISREL (1983) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Mael F., Ashforth B. E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behavior (1992) 13:103–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mael F., Ashforth B. E. Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psych. (1995) 48:309–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marques J. M., Abrams D., Hogg M. A. The black-sheep effect: Out-group homogeneity in social omparison settings. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances (1990) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 131–151Google Scholar
  • Marsh H. W., Balla J. R., McDonald R. P. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:391–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAdam D., McCarthy J. D., Zald M. N., Neil Smelser. Social movements. Handbook of sociology (1988) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 695–737Google Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis (1984) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • The National Rifle Association of AmericaWhat is the NRA and how does it work? (1996) . From the NRA homepage, www.nra.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Noel J. G., Wann D. L., Branscombe N. R. Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. J. Personality Social Psych. (1995) 68:127–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Oliver N. Work rewards, work values, and organizational commitment in an employee-owned firm: Evidence from the U.K.. Human Relations (1990) 43:513–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O“Reilly C., Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71(3):492–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pedhauzer E. J., Schmelkin L.Measurement, Design, and Analysis. An Integrated Approach (1991) (Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I.The Knowing-Doing Gap (2000) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pratt M. G., Whetten D. A., Godfrey P. C. To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational dentification. Identity in Organizations. Building Theory Through Conversations (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 171–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quattrone G. A., Worchel S., Austin W. On the perception of a group“s variability. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1986) 2(Nelson-Hall, New York) 25–48Google Scholar
  • Quattrone G. A., Jones E. E. The perception of variability within ingroups and outgroups: Implications for the law of small numbers. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1980) 38:141–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabbie J. M., Horwitz M. Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European J. Social Psych. (1988) 18:117–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger R. K., Mullane J. V., Gustafson L. T., DeMarie S. M. Creating earthquakes to change organizational mindsets. Acad. Management Executive (1994) 4:31–46Google Scholar
  • Reid F. J. M. Polarizing effects of intergroup comparison. European J. Social Psych. (1983) 13:103–106Google Scholar
  • Rice F. Denny“s changes its spots. Fortune Magazine (1996) 133(9):133–142Google Scholar
  • Sandalow M. A skeet-shooting enemy of the NRA. San Francisco hronicle (1999) . (May 2) 7Google Scholar
  • Schneider B., Hall D. T., Nygren H. T. Self image and job characteristics as correlates of changing organizational identification. Human Relations (1971) 24:397–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder C. R., Fromkin H. C.Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference (1980) (Plenum, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spears R., Oakes P. J., Ellemers N., Haslam A.The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life (1997) (Blackwell Publishers Inc., Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Steele C. M., Berkowitz L. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Psychology (1988) 21(Academic Press, New York) 261–302Google Scholar
  • Steele C. M., Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1995) 69:797–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (1982) (Cambridge University Press and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l“Homme, Cambridge) Google Scholar
  • Turner J. C.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory (1987) (Blackwell, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weiss P. A hoplophobe among the gunnies. New York Times Magazine (1994) September 11):66Google Scholar
  • Wetherell M., Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes P. J., Reicher S.D., Wetherell M. Social identity and group polarization. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Blackwell, Oxford and New York) Google Scholar
  • Wilder D. A. Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule. J. Experiment. Social Psych. (1984) 20:177–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood J. V. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psych. Bull. (1989) 106:231–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood J. V., Taylor S. E., Lichtman R. R. Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. J. Personality Social Psych. (1985) 49:1169–1183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.