Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance: A Reassessment of Postbureaucracy Theory

References

  • Adler P. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:147–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P., Borys B. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:61–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):334–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Appelbaum E., Batt R.The New American Workplace (1994) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Applegate L., DeSanctis G., Fulk J. In search of a new organizational model: Lessons from the field. Shaping Organization Form: Communication, Connection and Community (1998) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Baron R., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R., Osterman P. From bureaucracy to enterprise? The changing jobs and careers of managers in telecommunications service. (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) . Broken Ladders: Managerial Careers in the New EconomyGoogle Scholar
  • Beekun R. I. Assessing the effectiveness of sociotechnical interventions: Antidote or fad? Human Relations (1989) 47:877–897CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell G. Determinants of span of control. Amer. J. Soc. (1967) 73:100–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besser T.Team Toyota: Transplanting the Toyota Culture to the Camry Plant in Kentucky (1996) (State University of New York Press, Albany NY) Google Scholar
  • Blau P. The hierarchy of authority in organizations. Amer. J. Soc. (1968) 73:453–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations. Social Sci. Res. (1972) 1:1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryk A. S., Raudenbusch S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (1992) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Cappelli P. Technology and skill requirements: Implications for establishment wage structures. New England Econom. Rev. (1996) May-June):139–155Google Scholar
  • Doeringer P., Christensen K., Flynn P., Hall D., Katz H., Keefe J., Ruhm C., Sum A., Useem M.Turbulence in the American Workplace (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg E. Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Comm. Res. (1990) 17:139–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 4:84–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford J. D. Department context and formal structure as constraints on leader behavior. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24:274–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C., Romney A. K., Freeman S. C. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropologist (1987) 89:310–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fry L. W., Kerr S., Lee C. Effects of different leader behaviors under different levels of task interdependence. Human Relations (1986) 39:1067–1082CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA) Google Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Cost/quality tradeoffs in the departure process? Evidence from the major U.S. airlines. Trans. Res. Record No. 1480 (1995) Google Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Organizing work to support relational coordination. Internat. J. Human Resource Management (2000a) 11(3):517–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Paradox of coordination and control. California Management Rev. (2000b) 42(3):101–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Relational coordination and flight departure performance. (2001a) . Working paper Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. Coordinating mechanisms in care providers groups: Input uncertainty as a mediator and relational coordination as a moderator of performance effects. (2001b) . Working paper Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H., Fairfield K., Bierbaum B., Head W., Jackson R., Kelly M., Laskin R., Lipson S., Siliski J., Thornhill T., Zuckerman J. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and the length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care (2000) 38(8):807–819CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman P. S., Ravlin E., Schminke M., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1987) 9(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 121–173Google Scholar
  • Goodstadt B. E., Kipnis D. Situational influences on the use of power. J. Appl. Psych. (1970) 54:201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon D.Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial “Downsizing.” (1996) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hackman R., Oldham G.Work Redesign (1980) (Addison-Wesley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Handel M.Models of Economic Organization and the New Inequality in the United States (2000) (Harvard Sociology Department Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) . Doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46:1251–1271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckscher C., Donnellon A.The Post-Bureaucratic Organization (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Heller F., Yukl G. Participation, managerial decision-making and situational variables. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1969) 4:227–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Lee S. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):757–777LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hickson D. J. A convergence in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1966) 11:224–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt R. G. Technology and organization. Acad. Management J. (1970) 22:235–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ittner C., MacDuffie J. P. Exploring the sources of international differences in manufacturing overhead. Industrial Relations (1994) 34(2):147–169Google Scholar
  • Jermier J., Berkes L. Leader behavior in a police command bureaucracy: A closer look at the quasi-military model. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Tushman M. Communication patterns, project performance and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1979) 23:139–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y., Lee B. R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea: A multidimensional approach. R&D Management (1995) 25(2):179–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kipnis D., Cosentino J. Use of leadership powers in industry. J. Appl. Psych. (1969) 53:460–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kipnis D., Lane W. P. Self confidence and leadership. J. Appl. Psych. (1962) 46:291–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Likert R.New Patterns of Management (1961) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lord R. G., Rouzee M. Task interdependence, temporal phase and cognitive heterogeneity as determinant of leadership behavior and behavior-performance relations. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1979) 23:182–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie J. P., Osterman P. Automotive white collar: The changing status and roles of salaried employees in the North American auto industry. Broken Ladders: Managerial Careers in the New Economy (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • McGregor D.The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mowday R., Porter L., Steers R.Employee Organization Linkages (1982) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Piore M., Sabel C.The Second Industrial Divide (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter L., Lawler E. The effects of ‘tall’ versus ‘flat’ organization structures on managerial job satisfaction. Personnel Psych. (1964) 17(2):135–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preston M. G., Heintz R. K. Effects of participatory vs. supervisory leadership on group judgment. J. Abnormal and Social Psych. (1949) 44:345–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rubenstein A., Barth R., Douds C. Ways to improve communications between R&D groups. Res. Management (1971) 14:49–59Google Scholar
  • Rubinstein S. The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of the Saturn Corporation. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2000) 53(1):197–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saavedra R., Earley P. C., Van Dyne L. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(1):61–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schriesheim C., House R., Kerr S. Leader initiating structure: A reconciliation of discrepant research results and some empirical tests. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1976) 15:297–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott E., O'Shaughnessy K. C., Cappelli P., Osterman P. Management jobs in the insurance industry: Organization deskilling and rising pay inequality. Broken Ladders: Managerial Careers in the New Economy (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Seers A. Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Process (1989) 43:118–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seers A., Petty M. M., Cashman J. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group and Organ. Management (1995) 20(1):18–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw M. E. A comparison of two types of leadership in various communication nets. J. Abnormal and Social Psych. (1955) 50:127–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith V. New forms of work organization. Ann. Rev. Soc. (1997) 23:315–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson W. B., Gilly M. C. Problem solving networks in organizations: Intentional design and emergent structure. Social Sci. Res. (1993) 22:92–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stogdill R. M.Handbook of Leadership (1974) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tannenbaum A.Control in Organizations (1968) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Taylor F. W.The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Dover Publications, Toronto Canada) Google Scholar
  • Thompson J.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Udy S. H.Organization of Work (1959) (HRAF Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Urwick L. The manager's span of control. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1956) 34:39–47Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven A., Delbecq A., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1976) 41:322–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker C., Guest R., Turner A.The Foreman on the Assembly Line (1956) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wall T. D., Kemp N. J., Jockron P. R., Clegg C. W. Outcomes of autonomous work groups: A long-term field experiment. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(2):280–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waller M. J. The timing of adaptive group responses to non-routine events. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):127–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton R. From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) Google Scholar
  • Walton R., Hackman R., Goodman P. Groups under contrasting management strategies. Designing Effective Work Groups (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) . AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  • Walton R., Schlesinger L. Do supervisors thrive in participative work systems? Organ. Dynam. (1979) 7(3):25–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Giuliano T., Hertel P. T., Ickes W. J. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K., Roberts K. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavior and performance consequences of CEO board social ties. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(1):7–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  • Womack J., Jones D., Roos D.The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production (1991) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.