Controlling Decision-Making Practice in Organizations

References

  • Arkes H. R., Dawes R. M., Christensen C. Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1986) 37(1):423–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balanda K. P., Stanton W. R., Lowe J. B. Predictors of sun protective behaviors among school students. Behavioral Medicine (1999) 25(1):28–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Tomaso N. Technology power, and the social organization of work. Research in the Sociology of Organization (1988) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 33–80Google Scholar
  • Beer M., Eisenstat R. A., Spector B. Why change programs don't produce change. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(1):158–167Google Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Do forecasts produced by organizations reflect anchoring and adjustment?. J. Forecasting (1987) 6:201–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brush T. H., Artz K. W. Toward a contingent resource-based theory: The impact of information asymmetry on the value of capabilities in veterinary medicine. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(3):223–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models (1992) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Carter R. L., Feuerstein M., Love J. T. Repeated measures regression–An application to the analysis of mood and chronic pain. Comput. Statist. and Data Anal. (1986) 4(2):131–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter E. E. The behavioral theory of the firm and top-level corporate decision. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16(4):413–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psych. Measurement (1960) 20(1):37–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F., Kottemann J. Determinants of decision rule use in a production planning task. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(2):145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day D. V., Lord R G. Expertise and problem categorization—The role of expert processing in organizational sense-making. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(1):35–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dean J. W., Sharfman M. P. Procedural rationality in the strategic decision-making process. J. Management Stud. (1993) 30(4):587–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dean J. W., Sharfman M. P. Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(2):368–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Org. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E. Interpretations on automatic: A different view of strategic issue diagnosis. J. Management Stud. (1993) 30(3):339–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Towards a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):737–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., March J. G. Information in organizations as signal or symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(2):171–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford J. D., Backoff R., Quinn R. E., Cameron K. Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. Paradox and Transformation (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 81–121Google Scholar
  • Fredrickson J. W. The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, and future directions. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(3):445–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson J. W., Iaquinto A. L. Inertia and creeping rationality in strategic decision processes. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(3):516–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Poole P. P. Scripts in organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(3):449–459Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Socio. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M., Nohria N., Eccles R. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. >Networks and Organizations: Structure Form and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 25–56Google Scholar
  • Hedlund J., Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R. Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1998) 76(1):30–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hickson D. J., Butler R. J., Cray D., Mallory G. R., Wilson D. C.Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hofmann D. A. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Management (1997) 23(6):723–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Sego D. J. Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quart. (1993) 5(1):3–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., LePine J. A., Colquitt J. A., Hedlund J. Extending the multilevel theory of team decision making: Effects of feedback and experience in hierarchical teams. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(3):269–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., LePine J. A., Hedlund J., Major D. A., Phillips J. The multilevel theory of team decision-making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. J. Appl. Psych. (1995) 80(2):292–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., McDaniel R. R. The decision-making paradigm of organizational design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):572–589LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs D. R., Hannan P. J., Wallace D. Interpreting age, period and cohort effects in plasma lipids and serum insulin using repeated measures regression analysis: The CARDIA study. Statist. Medicine (1999) 18(6):655–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psychology (1982) 67(2):219–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Slovik P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein G.Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics (1977) 33(March):159–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A. In search of rationality: The purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(4):598–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leblibici H., Salancik G. R. Effects of environmental uncertainty on information and decision processes in banks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):578–596CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33(3):345–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Van de Ven A. H., Joyce W. Decision making perspective. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior (1981) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision-making. Accounting, Organ., and Soc. (1987) 12(1):153–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P., March J. G., Weissinger-Baylon R. Garbage can models of decision making in organizations. Ambiguity and Command (1986) (Pitman, Marshfield, MA) 11–35Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • McNamara G., Bromiley P. Decision making in an organizational setting: Cognitive and organizational influences on risk assessment in commercial lending. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(5):1063–1088CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNamara G., Bromiley P. Risk and return in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(3):329–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. The architecture of simplicity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(1):116–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday R. T., Sutton R. I. Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Rev. Psych. (1993) 44:195–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nayyar P. Information asymmetries: A source of competitive advantage for diversified service firms. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(7):513–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1987) 39(1):84–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer Special Issue):187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Chatman J. A., Cummings L. L., Staw B. A. Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior (1996) 18(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 157–200Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips J. M. Antecedents of leader utilization of staff input in decision-making teams. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2000) 77(3):215–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., DeSanctis G., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 173–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell J. L. An attempt at increasing decision rule use in a judgment task. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1991) 48(1):89–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regehr G., Norman G. R. Issues in cognitive psychology: Implications for professional education. Academic Medicine (1996) 71(9):988–1001CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson P. J., Roberts D. R., Porras J. I. Dynamics of planned organizational change: Assessing empirical support for a theoretical model. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):619–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan A. M., McFarland L., Baron H., Page R. An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psych. (1999) 52(2):359–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seabright M. A., Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. A. Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(1):122–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schein E. H. Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Systems Practice (1996) 9(1):27–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational Natural and Open Systems (1987) 2nd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior (1992) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 231–266Google Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tetlock P. E. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Adv. Experimental Psych. (1992) 25:331–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D., Tuden A., Thompson J. D. Strategies, structures and processes of organizational decision. Comparative Studies in Administration (1959) (The University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J., Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Exploiting opportunities for technological improvement in organizations. Managing Strategic Innovation and Change (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) 53–67Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L.Measuring and Assessing Organizations (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Walker A. G., Smither J. W. A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psych. (1999) 52(2):393–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(2):301–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Quinn R. E. Organizational change and development. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:361–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D., Sutton R., Staw B. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior (1999) 21(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 81–124Google Scholar
  • Worchel S., Brehm J. W. Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1971) 18(2):294–304Google Scholar
  • Zucker L. G. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Rev. Sociology (1987) 13:443–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.