A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation Implementation

References

  • Arthur B. A. On designing economics agents that behave like human agents. J. Evolutionary Econom. (1993) 3:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron J., Gjerde K. P. Who adopts total quality management: Theory and an empirical test. J. Econom. and Management Strategy (1996) 5(1):69–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass F. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15:5LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brehmer B. Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica (1992) 81:211–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryant A. When management shoots for the moon. The New York Times (1998) Sept. 27Google Scholar
  • Byrne J. A. Management theory—Or fad of the month? Bus. Week (1997) June 23):47Google Scholar
  • Collins J., Porras J.Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (1994) (Harper-Collins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1992) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dean J., Bowen D. Managing theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(3):392–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl E., Sterman J. Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Proc. (1995) 62(2):198–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easton G., Jarrell S. The effects of total quality management on corporate performance: An empirical investigation. J. Bus. (1998) 71(2):253–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman P., Bazerman M., Conlon E. Institutionalization of planned change. Res. Organ. Behavior (1980) 2:215–246Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. Is job enrichment just a fad? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1975) 53(5):129–138Google Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Quality awards and the market value of the firm: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):415–436LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Homer J. A diffusion model with application to evolving medical technologies. Tech. Forecasting and Soc. Change (1987) 31:197–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hull C.Principles of Behavior (1943) (Appleton-Century-Croft, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kalish S., Lillien G., Mahajan V., Wind Y. Applications of innovations diffusion models in marketing. Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance (1986) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Klein K., Sorra J. The Challenge of Innovation Implementation. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(4):1055–1080CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotter J. P. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) March-AprilGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K. Aspiration-level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):623–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. Computer simulation of organizations as experiential learning systems: Implications for organization theory. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Lawler E., Mohrman S. Quality circles: After the honeymoon. Organ. Dynam. (1987) Spring):42–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E., Latham G., Erez M. The determinants of goal commitment. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(1):23–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) 2nd ed.(Blackwell, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Meyer J., Allen N.Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Application (1997) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Mezias S. J., Glynn M. A. Three faces of corporate renewal- Institution revolution and evolution. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(2):77–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday R., Porter L., Steers R.Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover (1982) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Murray J. D.Mathematical Biology (1993) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Sutton R.The Knowing-Doing Gap (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Plous S.The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (1993) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter L., Hackman J.Behavior in Organizations (1975) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter L., Lawler E.Managerial Attitudes and Performance (1968) (Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Repenning N. The improvement paradox: Three essays on process improvement. (1996) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning N., Sterman J., Cole R. B., Scott R. Getting quality the old fashioned way: Selfconfirming attributions in the dynamics of process improvement. Improving Theory and Research on Quality Enhancement in Organizations (2000) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sastry M. A. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):237–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaffer R., Thomson H. Successful change programs begin with results. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1992) Jan-Feb):80–89Google Scholar
  • Schneiderman A. Setting quality goals. Quality Progress (1988) April):55–57Google Scholar
  • Scholl R. Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as motivating force. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6(4):589–599CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skinner B.Science and Human Behavior (1953) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Steers R., Porter L.Motivation and Work Behavior (1991) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D.Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (2000) (Irwin/McGraw Hill, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Sterman J. D., Repenning N., Kofman F. Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):503–521LinkGoogle Scholar
  • The straining of quality The Economist(January 14):55Google Scholar
  • Thorndike E.Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies (1911) (Macmillan, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A., Poole M. Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):510–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weiner Y. Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Acad. Management Rev. (1982) 7(3):318–428Google Scholar
  • White J. B. Re-engineering gurus take steps to remodel their stalling vehicles. Wall Street J. (1996) 26(November):1Google Scholar
  • Wood R., Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):361–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.