Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building

References

  • Albert M., Avery D., Narin F., McAllister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy (1991) 20(3):251–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the United States semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 7:155–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P., Kogut B. The localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B. N., Khanna T. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):295–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Appleyard M. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 7:137–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. National Bureau of Economic Research. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baradacco J. L.The Knowledge Link (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA) Google Scholar
  • Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S.Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckley P., Casson M.Alternatives to the Multinational Enterprise (1976) (Macmillan, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Caves R. E. International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica (1971) 38:1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chi T. Performance verifiability and output sharing in collaborative ventures. Management Sci. (1996) 42:93–104LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi C. J., Raman M., Ussoltseva O. Knowledge-based exchange: Inalienability and reciprocity. (1998) . Discussion paper, City University Business School, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  • Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor F. J. Modal choice in a world of alliances: Analyzing organizational forms in the international hotel sector. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1998) 29(2):325–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor F. J., Lengl R. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor F. J., Wiginton J. Language and organization. Acad. of Management Rev. (1979) 4:179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunning J. H. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Res. Policy (1994) 23:67–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K., Schoonhoven C. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:136–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forsgren M., Holm U., Johanson J. Divisional headquarters go abroad-A step in the internationalization of the MNC. J. Management Stud. (1995) 32:475–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S., Korine H., Szulanski G. Internal communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. (1994) 40:96–110LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grindley P. C., Teece D. J. Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Rev. (1997) 39(2):8–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J., Narula R. Choosing organizational modes of strategic technology partnering: International costs and sectoral differences. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1996) 27:265–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamel G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:83–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J., Hall B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents—R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hedlund G. A model of knowledge management and the Nform corporation. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:73–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hymer S.The international operations of national firms: A study of direct investment (1959) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) . Ph.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Inkpen A. C. Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. Acad. of Management Executive (1998) 12(4):69–80Google Scholar
  • Jaffe M. Fogarty, Banks B. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):183–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe M. Fogarty, Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108:577–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Singh H. Alliance capability and success: A knowledge- based approach. (2000) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T. The scope of alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:340–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do: Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. The coevolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:255–264LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mansfield E., Teece D., Romeo A. Overseas research and development by United States-based firms. Quart. J. Econom. (1979) 95:737–750CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall A.Industry and Trade (1920) (Macmillan, London U.K) Google Scholar
  • Moore K., Birkinshaw J. Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence. Acad. of Management Executive (1998) 12(4):81–92Google Scholar
  • Mowery D., Oxley J., Silverman B. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:77–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nobel R., Birkinshaw J. Innovation in multinational corporations: control and communication patterns in international R&D. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:479–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nooteboom B., Groenewegen J. Transaction costs and technological learning. Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond (1996) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 327–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostry S., Gestrin M. Foreign direct investment, technology transfer and the innovation-network model. Transnational Corporations (1993) 2(3):7–30Google Scholar
  • Parkhe A. Interfirm diversity organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22:579–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlmutter H. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia J. World Bus. (1969) AprilGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi Michael. The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Anchor Day Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M.The Competitive Advantage of Nations (1990) (Free Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1990) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:483–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundaryspanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Rev. (1990) Fall):39–112Google Scholar
  • Scherer F. M. Firm size market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1965) December):1097–1125Google Scholar
  • Shan W., Song J. Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technology advantage: An evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1997) 28:267–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson J. B., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation. Forthcoming. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:81–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Econom. J. (1977) 87:242–261Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Transaction cost economics and multinational enterprise. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1986) 7:21–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Competition cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1992) 18:118–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark OfficeGeneral Information Concerning Patents (1992) . U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Zander I. Technological diversification in the multinational corporation: Historical evolution and future prospects. Res. Policy (1997) 26:209–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.