Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development

References

  • Allen Thomas J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ancona Deborah G., Caldwell David F. Bridging the boundary: External process and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aoki Masahiko. Toward an economic model of the Japanese firm. J. Econom. Literature (1990) XXVIII(March):1–27Google Scholar
  • Aoshima Yaichi. Knowledge transfer across generations: The impact on product development performance in the automobile industry. (1996) (MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA) . Unpublished doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Arora Ashish, Alfonso Gambardella. The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy (1994) 23:523–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin Carliss Y., Clark Kim B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) September–October):84–93Google Scholar
  • Bertodo R. The role of suppliers in implementing a strategic vision. Long Range Planning (1991) 24(3):40–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown Shona L., Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brusoni Stefano, Andrea Prencipe. Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products, and organizations. Indust. and Corporate Change (2001) 10(1):179–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark Kim B. Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Sci. (1989) 35(10):1247–1263LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark Kim B., Takahiro Fujimoto. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Conner Kathleen R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cusumano Michael A., Kentaro Nobeoka. Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-Project Mananagement is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies (1998) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cusumano Michael A., Akira Takeishi. Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U.S. auto plants. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(8):563–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz Harold, Williamson Oliver E., Winter Sidney G. The Theory of the Firm Revisited. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 159–178Google Scholar
  • Dertouzos Michael L., Lester Richard K., Solow Robert M.The MIT Commission on Industrial ProductivityMade in America: Regaining the Productivity Edge (1989) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dyer Jeffrey H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1996a) 17(4):271–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer Jeffrey H. How Chrysler created an American keiretsu. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996b) 74(4):42–56Google Scholar
  • Dyer Jeffrey H., Harbir Singh. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellison David J., Clark Kim B., Takahiro Fujimoto, Young-suk Hyun. Product development performance in the auto industry: 1990s update. (1995) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Fine Charles H.Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (1998) (Perseus Books, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fine Charles H., Whitney Daniel E. Is the make-buy decision process a core competence? (1996) . Forthcoming, MIT IMVP Sponsors' Meeting, Sao Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  • Foss Nicolai J. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. (1996a) 7(5):470–476LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foss Nicolai J. More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organ. Sci. (1996b) 7(5):519–523LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fujimoto Takahiro, Takashi Matsuo, Akira Takeishi. Diffusion and changes of automobile parts procurement practices: A report on a questionnaire survey for Japanese first-tier parts suppliers (in Japanese). (1999) . Discussion paper, Faculty of Economics, Tokyo UniversityGoogle Scholar
  • Grant Robert M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helper Susan. Strategy and irreversibility in supplier relations: The case of the U.S. automobile industry. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1991a) 65(Winter):781–824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson Rebecca M., Clark Kim B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti Marco. Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • IRCAutomotive Parts Sourcing in Japan (1997) (IRC, Nagoya, Japan) . (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  • Carlos Jarillo J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:31–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston Russell, Lawrence Paul R. Beyond vertical integration—The rise of the value-adding partnership. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1988) 66(4):94–101Google Scholar
  • Kanter Rosabeth Moss, Myers Paul S., Amitai Etzioni, Paul R. Lawrence. Interorganizational bonds and intraorganizational behavior: How alliances and partnerships change the organizations forming them. Socio-Economics: Toward a New Synthesis (1991) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 329–344Google Scholar
  • Kogut Bruce, Udo Zander. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut Bruce, Udo Zander. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kusunoki Ken, Tsuyoshi Numagami, Akira Goto, Hiroyuki Odagiri. Intrafirm transfers of engineers in Japan. Innovation in Japan (1997) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.) 173–203Google Scholar
  • Liker Jeffrey K., Kamath Rajan R., Nazli Wasti S., Mitsuo Nagamachi. Integrating suppliers into fast-cycle product development. Engineered in Japan (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 152–191Google Scholar
  • Lynn Leonard H., Piehler Henry R., Mark Kieler. Engineering careers, job rotation, and gatekeepers in Japan and the United States. J. Eng. and Tech. Management (1993) 10(1&2):53–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles Reymond E., Snow Charles C. Fit, failure, and the hall of the fame. California Management Rev. (1984) 26(3):10–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Misawa Kazufumi, Ken-ichi Hattori. R&D outsourcing to create core competence (in Japanese). Kenkyu Kaihatsu Manejimento [R&D Management] (1998) 8(6):4–12Google Scholar
  • Nishiguchi Toshihiro. Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nonaka Ikujiro. Redundant, overlapping organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(3):27–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1995) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose Edith T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer Jeffrey, Salancik Gerald R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Piore Michael J., Sabel Charles F.Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Polanyi Michael. The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Anchor Day, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter Michael E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Powell Walter W., Staw Barry M., Cummings Larry L. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational behavior (1990) 12(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Saxenian Annalee. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Takeishi Akira. Bridging inter- and intrafirm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(5):403–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich Karl. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24:419–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel Eric. Task partitioning: An innovation process variable. Res. Policy (1990) 19:407–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson Oliver E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Womack James P., Jones Daniel T., Daniel Roos. The Machine That Changed the World (1990) (Rawson Associates, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.