Disentangling the Theories of Firm Boundaries: A Path Model and Empirical Test

References

  • Abetti P. A. Technology: A key strategic resource. Management Rev. (1989) 78(2):37–41Google Scholar
  • Alchian A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62:777–795Google Scholar
  • Alchian A., Woodward S. Reflections on the theory of the firm. J. Institutional and Theoret. Econom. (1987) 143:111–136Google Scholar
  • Alston L., Gillespie W. Resource coordination and transaction costs: A framework for analyzing the firm/market boundary. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1989) 11:191–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16:74–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baird I., Thomas H. Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:230–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan S., Wernerfelt B. Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:347–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88:588–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmines E., McIver J., Bohrnstedt G., Borgatta E. Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. Social Measurement: Current Issues (1981) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 65–115Google Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Wheelwright S. C.Managing New Product and Process Development (1993) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Conner K. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? J. Management (1991) 17:121–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K. The resource-based challenge to the industry-structure perspective. Acad. Management Best Papers Proc. (1994) 17–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:477–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor F. J. The profitability of technology licensing by U.S. multinationals. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1980) 11:40–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1504–1514LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas M., Wildavsky A.Risk and Culture (1982) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Duhaime I. M., Schwenk C. R. Conjectures on cognitive simplification in acquisition and divestment decision making. Strategic Management J. (1985) 5:301–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:57–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:136–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Folta T. Governance and uncertainty: The trade-off between administrative control and commitment. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:1007–1028CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:470–477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:13–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godfrey P. C., Hill C. W. L. The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:519–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golden B. R. The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:848–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J., Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:291–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hennart J. F. A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:361–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L. Cooperation opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:500–513CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L. Strategies for exploiting technological innovations: When and when not to license. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:428–441LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Snell S. A. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:25–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Hwang P., Kim W. C. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:117–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Power D. J. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John G. An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21:278–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joskow P. Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: Empirical evidence from coal markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77:168–185Google Scholar
  • Kim W. C., Hwang P. Global strategy and multinationals' entry mode choice. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1992) 23:29–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Sci. (1991) 37:19–33LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the MNC. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24:625–645CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lambe C. J., Spekman R. E. Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14:102–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latham G. P., Wexley K. N.Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal (1982) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA) Google Scholar
  • Madhok A. The organization of economic activity: Transaction costs firm capabilities, and the nature of governance. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:577–590LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath R. T. Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning. Res. Tech. Management (2000) 43(4):35–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNamara G., Bromiley P. Decision making in an organizational setting: Cognitive and organizational influences on risk assessment in commercial lending. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:1063–1088CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller C., Cardinal L., Glick W. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:189–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W., Singh K. Incumbants' use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1992) 18:347–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moran P., Ghoshal S. Theories of economic organization: The case for realism and balance. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:58–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Special Issue):77–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muthen B. O., du Toit S., Spisic D. Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Psychometrica (2002) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Muthen L., Muthen B.Mplus: The Comprehensive Modeling Program for Applied Researchers (1998) (Muthen and Muthen, Los Angeles, CA) Google Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. The R and D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:153–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1958) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL) Google Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:853–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed R., DeFillippi R. J. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:88–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts E. B., Berry C. A. Entering new businesses: Selecting strategies for success. Sloan Management Rev. (1985) 26:3–17Google Scholar
  • Robertson T. S., Gatignon H. Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:515–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson W. S. The statistical measurement of agreement. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1957) 22:17–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelt R. P., Montgomery C. A. Inertia and transformation. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 101–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider S., Lopes L. Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. J. Experiment. Psych.—Human Perception and Performance (1986) 12:535–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. The effect of national culture on the choice between licensing and direct foreign investment. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:627–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z.Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective (1995) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1961) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Singh J. V. Performance slack, and risk-taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Pablo A. L. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17:9–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Souder W., Shrivastava P. Towards a scale for measuring technology in new product innovations. Res. Policy (1985) 14:151–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steensma H. K., Corley K. Organizational context as a moderator of theories on firm boundaries for technology sourcing. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:271–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steensma H. K., Corley K. On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships: The interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:1045–1067CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutcliffe K. M., Zaheer A. Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R., Staw B. What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:371–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tyler B. B., Steensma H. K. Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:43–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G., Weber D. A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:373–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wiseman R., Bromiley P. Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance, and decline. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:524–543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.