Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies

References

• Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):147–167Link, Google Scholar
• Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (The MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Baba Y., Nobeoka K. Towards knowledge-based product development: The 3D-CAD model of knowledge creation. Res. Policy (1998) 26:643–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(September–October):84–93Google Scholar
• Bensaou M. Collaboration support technologies in interorganizational relationships: An empirical exploration in buyer-supplier joint design activities. (1999) . Working paper 99/78/TM/ABA, INSEADGoogle Scholar
• Boehm Barry W.Software Engineering Economics (1981) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli L. L.Designing Engineers (1994) (The MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cooper R. C.Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch (1993) (Addison Wesley, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A. How Microsoft makes large teams work like small teams. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 39(Fall):9–20Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A., Nobeoka K.Thinking beyond lean: How multi-project management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies (1998) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Eastman R. M. Engineering information release prior to final design freeze. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1980) EM-27:37–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E., Smith R. P., Gebala D. A. A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design (1994) 6:1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison Wesley, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43:437–451Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Liker J. K., Sobek II D. K., Ward A. C., Cristiano J. J. Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: Evidence for set-based concurrent engineering. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1996) 43:165–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1032–1048Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C. Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: Capacity and congestion effects. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16:145–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Swamidass P. M. Product development and concurrent engineerin. Encyclopaedia of Production and Manufacturing Management (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, Germany) 567–575Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis (1984) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Morris P. W. G., Hugh G. H.The Anatomy of Major Projects (1987) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1991) 69(November–December):96–104Google Scholar
• Pich M. T., Loch C. H., De Meyer A. On ambiguity, uncertainty and complexity in project management. (2002) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Sabbagh K.Twenty-First Century Jet (1996) (Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
• Schelling T. C.Micromotives and Macrobehavior (1978) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Schrader S., Riggs W. M., Smith R. P. Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving. J. Eng. Tech. Management (1993) 10:73–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scrivener S. A. R., Woodcock A., Ball L. J.Collaborative Design (2000) (Springer, Berlin-New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobek D. K., Ward A. C., Liker J. K. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 39(Winter):67–83Google Scholar
• Soderberg L. G. Facing up to the Engineering gap. McKinsey Quart. (1989) 25(Spring):3–23Google Scholar
• Staudenmayer N. Webs of interdependency: Strategies for managing multiple interdependencies in new product development. (1999) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Stoy R., Rosenau M. D., Griffin A., Castellion G. A., Anschuetz N. F. Assembled product developmen. The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development (1996) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H., Nonaka I. The new, new product development game. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1986) 64(January–February):137–146Google Scholar
• Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M.Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Germany) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development. J. Product Innovation Management (1999a) 16:160–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Sci. (1999b) 45(4):455–465Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. H. The role of flexibility in the design of new products: An empirical study. Res. Policy (1997) 26:105–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. H. Simulation, learning and R'D performance: Evidence from automotive development. Res. Policy (1998) 27:55–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Trip G. Turning rough takes into summer's big hits. New York Times (1997) May 5):D1Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24:419–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbeq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1976) 41:322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Victor B., Blackburn R. S. Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:486–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(4):628–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Revolutionizing Product Development (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zadeh L. A fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. Comm. ACM (1994) 37:77–84Crossref, Google Scholar