When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation

References

  • Arno A. Ritual of reconciliation and village conflict management in Fiji. Oceania (1976) XLVII:49–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R., Hamilton W. The evolution of cooperation. Sci. (1981) 211:1390–1396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettenhausen K., Murnighan J. K. The emergence of norms in competitive decision making groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:350–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bies R. J., Moag J. S., Lewicki R. J., Sheppard B. H., Bazerman M. H. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiations in Organizations (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 43–55Google Scholar
  • Bies R. J., Shapiro D. L. Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Soc. Justice Res. (1987) 1:199–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bies R. J., Tripp T. M., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. Trust in Organizations (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bies R. J., Shapiro D. L., Cummings L. L. Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it not enough to say it's not my fault. Comm. Res. (1988) 15:381–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boehm C.Blood Revenge: The Anthropology of Feuding in Montenegro and Other Tribal Societies (1984) (University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS) Google Scholar
  • Bottom W. P. Testing the limits of rationality: Social accounting cognitive illusions, and the unenforceable provisions of the treaty of Versailles. (2001) . Working paper, John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  • Bottom W. P., Eavey C. L., Miller G. J. Getting to the core: Coalitional integrity as a constraint on the power of agenda setters in decision making groups. J. Conflict Resolution (1996) 40:298–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradfield M., Aquino K. The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. J. Management (1999) 25:607–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Weisenfeld B. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psych. Bull. (1996) 120:189–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J., McGrath R. G. Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive environment. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1135–1148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:57–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Gibbons R. Cheap talk with two audiences. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79:214–223Google Scholar
  • Folger R., Murnighan J. K. Reactions to mistreatment at work. Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research (1993) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 161–183Google Scholar
  • Goffman E.Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order (1971) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hayashi N. From TIT-FOR-TAT to OUT-FOR-TAT. Sociological Theory and Methods (1993) 8:19–32Google Scholar
  • Hayashi N., Ostrom E., Walker J., Yamagishi T. Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Soc. (1999) 11:27–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., Miner A. S. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller interaction. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:265–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschman A. O.Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (1970) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kahn L., Murnighan J. K. A general experiment on bargaining in demand games with outside options. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83:1260–1280Google Scholar
  • Koch K. F., Altorki S., Arno A., Hickson L. Ritual reconciliation and the obviation of grievances: A comparative study in the ethnography of law. Ethnology (1977) 16:269–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Komorita S. S., Mechling J. Betrayal and reconciliation in a two-person game. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1967) 6:349–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Komorita S. S., Parks C. D., Budescu D. V., Erev I., Zwick R. Reciprocity and cooperation in social dilemmas: Review and future directions. Games and Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 315–330Google Scholar
  • Konovsky M. A., Jaster F. “Blaming the victim” and other ways business men and women account for questionable behavior. J. Bus. Ethics (1989) 8:391–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Eccles R., Nohria N. The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA) 216–239Google Scholar
  • Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B., Hanna B. A., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 357–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:76–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 114–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:438–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindskold S. Trust development the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation. Psych. Bull. (1978) 85:772–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindskold S., Betz B., Walters P. S. Transforming competitive or cooperative climates. J. Conflict Resolution (1986) 30:99–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindskold S., Walters P. S., Koutsourais H. Cooperators, competitors, and response to GRIT. J. Conflict Resolution (1983) 27:521–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowin A. Participative decision making: A model literature critique, and prescriptions for research. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1968) 3:68–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. Tragedy in the trenches: The ineffectiveness of uninformed strategic choices in intergroup prisoners' dilemmas. (2001) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • McCornack S. A., Levine T. R. When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception. Comm. Monographs (1990) 57:119–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehlman R. C., Snyder C. R. Excuse theory: A test of the selfprotective role of attributions. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1985) 49:994–1001CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mills C. Politics and manipulation. Soc. Theory and Practice (1995) 2:97–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison E. W., Robinson S. L. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22:226–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murnighan J. K. Defectors vulnerability, and relative power: Some causes and effects of leaving a stable coalition. Human Relations (1981) 34:589–609CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murnighan J. K.The Dynamics of Bargaining Games (1991) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ) Google Scholar
  • Murnighan J. K., Roth A. E. Expecting continued play in prisoner's dilemma games: A test of several models. J. Conflict Resolution (1983) 27:279–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • North J. Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy (1987) 62:449–508CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pilisuk M., Winter J. A., Chapman R., Haas N. Honesty, deceit, and timing in the display of intentions. Behavioral Sci. (1967) 12:205–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pillutla M. M., Murnighan J. K. Being fair or appearing fair: Strategic behavior in ultimatum bargaining. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:1408–1426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rempel J. K., Holmes J. G., Zanna M. P. Trust in close relationships. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1985) 49:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A. E., Murnighan J. K. Equilibrium behavior and repeated play in prisoners' dilemma games. J. Math. Psych. (1978) 17:189–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., McLean Parks J., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1993) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–43Google Scholar
  • Schenkel R. Submission: Its features and functions in the wolf and dog. Amer. Zoologist (1967) 7:319–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlenker B. R.Impression Management (1980) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey CA) Google Scholar
  • Schwartz G., Kane T., Joseph J., Tedeschi J. T. The effects of remorse on the reactions to a harm-doer. British J. Soc. Clinical Psych. (1978) 17:293–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott M. B., Lyman S. M. Accounts. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1968) 33:46–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro D. L. The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:614–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro D. L., Buttner E. H., Barry B. Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1994) 58:346–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sigmund E. W. Ho'o ponopono: A traditional Hawaiian practice for setting relationships right. Trans. Anal. J. (1999) 3-4:373–392Google Scholar
  • Stahl I.Bargaining Theory (1972) (Economics Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) Google Scholar
  • Thompson L., Loewenstein G. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1992) 51:176–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thoreson C. E., Luskin F., Harris A. H. S., Worthington E. L. Science and forgiveness interventions: Reflections and recommendations. Dimensions of Forgiveness (1998) (Templeton Foundation Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
  • de Waal F.Peacemaking Among Primates (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wilson J. Why forgiveness requires repentance. Philosophy (1988) 63:534–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witvliet C. V., Ludwig T. E., Vander Laan K. L. Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psych. Sci. (2001) 12:117–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.