Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice

References

• Abrahamson E. Management fashion. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):254–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amburgey T. L., Kelly D., Barnett W. P. Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:51–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C.Intervention Theory and Methods (1970) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Ashby W. R.Design for a Brain (1952) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. V. A simple model of herd behavior. Quar, t. J., Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–819Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J. N., Burton D., Hannan M. T. Engineering bureaucracy: The genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in hightechnology firms. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1999) 15(10):1–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigelow L. The evolution of the boundaries of the firm: Transaction cost alignment and organizational survival in the early American automobile industry. (2001) (Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA) . Ph.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradach J. L., Eccles R. G. Price, authority, and trust-From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociology (1989) 15:97–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:518–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Burrows P. Lew Platt's fix-it plan for Hewlett-Packard. Bus. Week (1998) 128July 13Google Scholar
• Burrows P. The radical: Carly Fiorina's bold management experiment at HP. Bus. Week (2001) February):70–80Google Scholar
• Cameron K., Quinn R.Paradox and Transformation (1988) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Carnall C. A.Managing Change in Organizations (1990) (Prentice Hall, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D. J.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge MA) Google Scholar
• Coch L., French J. R. P. Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations (1948) 1(August):512–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crozier M.The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (1964) (University of the Chicago Press, Chicago IL) Google Scholar
• Cummings S. Centralization and decentralization: The neverending story of separation and betrayal. Scandinavian J. Management (1995) 11(2):103–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Blackwell Business, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Dalton M.Men Who Managed (1959) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Demsetz H. The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1988) 4(1):141–161Google Scholar
• Dorf R. C.Modern Control Systems (1980) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R., Killman Ralph H., Pondy Louis R., Sleven Dennis. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization (1976) 1(North Holland, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Eccles R. G., Nohria N.Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management (1992) (HBS Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fayol H.General and Industrial Management (1949) . tr. Constance Stours, trans. Pitman, London, U.K.Google Scholar
• Forrester J. W.Industrial Dynamics (1961) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Gerard B. Just the two of us. Measure (1999) May-June):20–23Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J. G. Revolutionary change theories: A multi-level explanation of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):30–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould S. J. Punctuated equilibrium in fact and theory. J. Soc. Biol. Structures (1989) 12(2-3):117–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner L. E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1972) July-August):37–46Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M., Marrett C. B. Organization structure and communications. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1971) 36:860–871Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Ame, r. J., Sociology (1977) 82:929–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1984) 49(April):149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart J. F. Explaining the swollen middle-Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):529–547Link, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):972–991Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements toward a network theory of getting things done. Networks and Organizations (1992) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) 165–188Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadushin C., Brimm M. Why networking fails: Double binds and the limitations of shadow networks. Internat. Soc. Network Conf. (1990) (San Diego, CA)Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.The Change Masters (1983) (Simon & Shuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1978) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kelly D., Amburgey T. L. Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:591–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerwin K., Naughton K. Remaking Ford. Bus. Week (1999) October):132–42Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:342–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University GSB-Division of Research, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Leavitt H. J., March J. G. Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 1144–1170Google Scholar
• Levine D. S. Justice served; Richard Justice's reorganization of Hewlett-Packard computer systems unit. Sales & Marketing Management (1995) 147(5):52Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., March J. A model of adaptive organization search. J. Econom. Behavior and Organ. (1981) 2:307–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations (1947) 1(1):5–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R. Intra- (and inter-) organizational networks. Res. Sociology Organ. (1982) 1:1–38Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Masten S. E., Williamson O. E., Winter S. G. A legal basis for the firm. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 196–212Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. Quasi-natural organization science. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(4):351–380Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts R. J., Alt J., Shepsle K. Bargaining costs, influence costs, and the organization of economic activity. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (1990) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 57–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Qian Y., Roberts J. Complementarities, momentum, and the evolution of modern manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(2):84–88Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. (1980) 23(4):591–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Silverman B. S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Evidence from the for-hire trucking industry. (2001) . Working paper, John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
• Nohria N., Berkley J. Whatever happened to the take charge manager. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 72(1):128–137Google Scholar
• Pitta J. It had to be done, and we did it. Forbes (1993) 148–152April 26Google Scholar
• Powell W. W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1990) 12(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 295–336Google Scholar
• Rapaport A., Klir G. J. The uses of mathematical isomorphism in general system theory. Trends in General System Theory (1972) (Wiley, New York) 52–65Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J.Management and the Worker (1939) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P.Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sastry M. A. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):237–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott B. R. Stages of corporate development, Parts 1 and 2. (1971) 371–294Harvard Business School Case No. 9Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Shrader C. B., Lincoln J. R., Hoffman A. N. The network structures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form. Human Relations (1989) 42(1):43–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman B. S., Nickerson J. A., Freeman J. Profitability, transactional alignment, and organizational mortality in the U.S. trucking industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:31–52(Special Issue)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.The Shape of Automation for Men and Management (1965) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Stevenson W. Formal structure and networks of interaction with organizations. Soc. Sci. Res. (1990) 19:113–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tichy N. M., Nystrom P. C., Starbuck W. H. Networks in organizations. Handbook of Organizational Design (1980) 2(Oxford University Press, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Tichy N. M., Fombrum C. Network analysis in organizational settings. Human Relations (1979) 32:923–965Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trist E., Bamforth K. W. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations (1951) 4:3–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Romanelli E., Cummings L. L., Staw B. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) 7(JAI Pressv, Greenwich, CT) 171–222Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy L.General Systems Theory (1968) (Braziller, New York) Google Scholar
• Weber M., Gerth Hans H., Mills C. Wright. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1946) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991a) 36(June):269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Economic institutions: Spontaneous and intentional governance. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1991b) 7:159–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoder S. K. Quick change: A 1990, reorganization at Hewlett Packard already is paying off. Wall Street J. (1991) 7/22/1991). A 1Google Scholar
• Zajac E. J., Kraatz M. S., Bresser R. F. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):429–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T. Crafting internal hybrids: Complementarities, common change initiatives, and the team-based organization. Interna, t. J., Econom. Bus. (2002) 9(1):79–95Crossref, Google Scholar