The Use of Rewards to Increase and Decrease Trust: Mediating Processes and Differential Effects

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Alper S., Tjosvold D., Law K. S. Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1998) 74(1):33–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aronson E., Ellsworth P. C., Carlsmith J. M., Gonzales M. H.Methods of Research in Social Psychology (1990) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Phillips L. W. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(3):459–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bem D. J., Berkowitz L. Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1972) 6(Academic, New York) 1–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bottger P., Yetton P. An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving performance. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1988) 42(2):234–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler J. K., Cantrell R. S. Communication factors and trust: An exploratory study. Psych. Rep. (1994) 74(1):33–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cascio W. F. Managing a virtual workplace. Acad. Management Executive (2000) 14(3):81–90Google Scholar
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psych. Measurement (1960) 20(1):37–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cummings L. L., Bromiley P., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 302–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M. An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. Human Relations (1949a) 2(3):199–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M. A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations (1949b) 2(2):129–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Vader C. L., Bateson A. G., Lord R. G., Locke E. A. Attribution theory: A meta-analysis of attributional hypotheses. Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 63–81Google Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):450–467LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(4):611–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbins G., Lane I., Steiner D. A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. J. Organ. Behavior (1988) 9(3):281–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer W. G.Team Building: Issues and Alternatives (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fein S. Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1996) 70(6):1164–1184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fein S., Hilton J. L. Judging others in the shadow of suspicion. Motivation & Emotion (1994) 18(2):167–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman J. M. Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. J. Appl. Psych. (1981) 66(2):127–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert D. T., Jones E. E. Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1986) 50(2):269–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert D. T., Malone P. S. The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. (1995) 117(1):21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guetzkow H. Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. J. Clinical Psych. (1950) 6(1):47–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T.Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research (1989) (Interaction, Edina, MN) Google Scholar
  • Jones E. E.Interpersonal Perception (1990) (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Davis K. E., Berkowitz L. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) 2(Academic Press, New York) 219–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Davis K. E., Gergen K. J. Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1961) 63(2):302–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley H. H., Levine D. Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (1967) 15(University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE) 192–240Google Scholar
  • Kelley H. H. The processes of causal attribution. Amer. Psych. (1973) 28(2):107–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koller M. Risk as a determinant of trust. Basic and Appl. Soc. Psych. (1988) 9(4):265–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korsgaard M. A., Brodt S. E., Whitener E. M. Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(2):312–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., Sapienza H. J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):60–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:569–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruglanski A. W. Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1970) 6(2):214–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littlepage G. E., Schmidt G. W., Whisler E. W., Frost A. G. An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1995) 69(5):877–889CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Locke E. A. Generalizing from laboratory to field: Ecological validity or abstraction of essential elements? Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 3–9Google Scholar
  • Marcic D.Organizational Behavior: Experiences and Cases (1995) (West, Minneapolis, MN) Google Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perdue B. C., Summers J. O. Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(4):317–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Moorman R. H., Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quart. (1990) 1(2):107–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):393–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skopec E., Smith D. M.How to Use Team Building to Foster Innovation Throughout Your Organization (1997) (Contemporary Books, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Staw B. M. Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1975) 13(3):414–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strickland L. H. Surveillance and trust. J. Personality (1958) 26(2):200–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D. Effects of cooperative and competitive interdependence and task complexity on subordinates' productivity, perception of leader, and group development. Canadian J. Behavioural Sci. (1982) 14(1):24–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D. Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations (1984) 37(9):743–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tjosvold D. Dynamics within participation: An experimental investigation. Group and Organ. Stud. (1985) 10(3):260–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weingart L. R., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. Research in Organizational Behavior (1997) 19(JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT) 189–239Google Scholar
  • Whitener E. M., Brodt S. E., Korsgaard M. A., Werner J. M. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):513–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodman R. W., Sherwood J. J. The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88(1):166–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zand D., Steele F., Zalking S. The impact of an organizational development program on perceptions of interpersonal, group, and organization functioning. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1969) 5(3):393–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.