Free to Be Trusted? Organizational Constraints on Trust in Boundary Spanners

References

  • Adams S. J., Dunnette M. D. The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 1175–1199Google Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Herker D. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Management Rev. (1977) 2(2):217–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Weitz B. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):310–323LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Narus J. A. A model of distributor firm and manufacturing firm working partnerships. J. Marketing (1990) 54(January):42–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P. F., Chambers T. M. A reward/measurement model of organizational buying behavior. J. Marketing (1985) Spring49:7–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asanuma B. Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation specific skill. J. Japanese and Internat. Econom. (1989) 30:1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B.The Logic and Limits of Trust (1983) (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:61–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Econom. Behavior (1995) 10:122–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biddle B. J.Role Theory: Expectations: Identities and Behaviors (1979) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Brockner J., Siegel P. A., Daly J. P., Tyler T., Martin C. When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:558–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P., Cummings L. L., Bies R., Sheppard B., Lewicki R. Transaction costs in organizations with trust. Research on Negotiations in Organizations (1995) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 219–247Google Scholar
  • Butler J. K. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. J. Management (1991) 17(3):643–663CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociology (1988) 94(Supplement):S95–CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (The Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Conger J. A., Kanungo R. N. The empowerment process: Integrating theory into practice. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13:471–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crozier M., Friedberg E.L'acteur et le système. Les contraintes de l'action collective (1977) (Editions du Seuil, Paris, France) Google Scholar
  • Cummings L. L., Bromiley P., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI). Development and validation. Trust in Organizations (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 302–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currall S. C., Judge T. A. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1995) 64:151–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das T. K., Teng B. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliance. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):491–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das T. K., Teng B. Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organ. Stud. (2001) 22(2):251–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dilman D. A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method (1978) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dirks K. T. Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:1004–1012CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Ouchi W. G. Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. Sloan Management Rev. (1993) Fall35:51–63Google Scholar
  • Fisher R., Ury W.Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement Without Giving in (1981) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S. W., Lane P. J. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):154–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French J. R. P., Raven B., Cartwright D. The bases of social power. Studies in Social Power (1959) (University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI) 150–167Google Scholar
  • Friedman R. A., Podolny J. Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(March):28–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fukuyama F.Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gabarro J. J., Athos A. G., Gabarro J. J. The development of trust, influence, and expectations. Interpersonal Behavior: Communication and Understanding in Relationships (1978) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for practice: A critique of transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):13–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graen G., Dunnette M. D. Role making processes within complex organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 1201–1245Google Scholar
  • Griffin R. W., Staw B., Cummings L. L. Toward an integrated theory of task design. Research in Organizational Behavior (1987) 9(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 79–120Google Scholar
  • Griffin R. W., McMahan G. C., Greenberg J. Motivation through job design. Organizational Behavior. The State of the Science (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 23–43Google Scholar
  • Heide J. B., Miner A. S. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):265–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R., Dunette M., Hough L. The structure of work: Job design and roles. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 2(Consulting Psychological Press, Palo Alto, CA) 165–207Google Scholar
  • Jackson S. E., Schuler R. S. A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1985) 36:16–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Davis K. E., Berkowitz L. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) 2(Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Davis K. E., Gergen K. J. Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. J. Abnormal and Soc. Psych. (1961) 63:302–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones G. R. Transaction costs, property rights, and organizational culture: An exchange perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:454–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide (1996) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Kahn R. H., Wolfe D. M., Quinn R., Snoek D. J.Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1978) (Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kohli A. Determinants of influence in organizational buying: A contingency approach. J. Marketing (1989) 53(July):50–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(June):342–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationship. Trust in Organizations (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 114–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis J. D., Weigert A. J. Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces (1985) 63(4):967–985CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macneil I. R.The New Social Contract (1980) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S. Idiosyncratic jobs in formalized organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32:327–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C., Deshpandé R., Zaltman G. Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. J. Marketing (1993) 57(January):81–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:121–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Organizations and Organization Theory (1982) (Pitman, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Managing with Power. Politics and Influence in Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Polzer J. T., Nicholson N. Role Set. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior (1995a) (Blackwell Publishers Inc., Cambridge, MA) 495–498Google Scholar
  • Polzer J. T., Nicholson N. Role set. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior (1995b) (Blackwell Publishers Inc., Cambridge, MA) 499–500Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Trust-based forms of governance. Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 51–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pruitt D. G., Bazerman M. H., Lewicki R. J. Achieving integrative agreements. Negotiating in Organizations (1983) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 35–50Google Scholar
  • Raiffa H.The Art and Science of Negotiation (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Rempel J. K., Holmes J. G., Zanna M. P. Trust in close relationships. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1985) 49:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rizzo J. R., House R. J., Lirtzman S. I. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1970) 15:150–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. L. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:574–599CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):393–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seligman A. B.The Problem of Trust (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro S. P. The social control of impersonal trust. Amer. J. Sociology (1987) 93(3):623–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spekman R. E. Influence and information: An exploratory investigation of the boundary role person's basis of power. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22:104–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss G. Tactics of lateral relationship: The purchasing agent. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1962) 7(2):161–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tsui A. S., Ashford S. J., Clair L. St., Xin K. R. Dealing with discrepant expectations: Response strategies and managerial effectiveness. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:1515–1543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bos K., Wilke H. A. M., Lind E. A. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1998) 75:1449–1458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Schein E. H., Staw B. M. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1979) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 209–264Google Scholar
  • Walton R. E., Cutcher-Gershenfeld J. E., McKersie R. B.Strategic Negotiations (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Welbourne T. M., Johnson D. E., Erez A. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41:540–555CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilkins A. L., Ouchi W. G. Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:468–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams M. In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:377–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):141–159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zammuto R. F., O'Connor E. J. Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies benefits: The roles of organizational design and culture. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(4):701–728CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zand D. E. Trust and managerial problem solving. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:229–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior (1986) 8(JAI Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT) 53–111Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.