Sequential Variety in Work Processes

References

  • Abbott A. A primer on sequence methods. Organ. Sci. (1991) 1(4):375–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A. Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Rev. Sociology (1995) 21:93–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A., Hrycak A. Measuring resemblance in sequence data: An optimal matching analysis of musicians' careers. Amer. J. Sociology (1990) 96(1):144–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A., Tsay A. Sequence analysis and optimal matching in sociology: Review and prospect. Sociological Methods Res. (2000) 29(1):3–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Kunda G. Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:76–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizatioal routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):554–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Macintosh N. B. A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:207–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B., Tibshirani R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman and Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eichenbaum H. Declarative memory: Insights from cognitive neurobiology. Annual Rev. Psych. (1997) 48:547–572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:611–629LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleishman E. A., Quaintance M. K.Taxonomies of Human Performance (1984) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Folger J. P., Hewes D. E., Poole M. S., Dervin B., Voight M. J. Coding social interaction. Progress in Communication Science (1984) IV(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 115–161Google Scholar
  • Gael S.Job Analysis: A Guide to Assessing Work Activities (1983) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Gottman J. M., Roy A. K.Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavioral Researchers (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R.Work Redesign (1980) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Wageman R. Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:309–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hage J., Aiken M. Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12:72–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J.Organizational Ecology (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey R. J., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Job analysis. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1991) 22nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 71–163Google Scholar
  • Huber G. Organizational learning: Contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. The structure of work: Job design and roles. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1991) 22nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 165–207Google Scholar
  • Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve success? Management Sci. (1990) 36:1216–1231LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kolgomorov A. N. Three approaches to the definition of the concept “Quantity of Information.”. Problems Inform. Transmission (1965) 1:3–11Google Scholar
  • Leidner R.Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life (1993) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Lempel A., Ziv J. On the complexity of finite sequences. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (1976) 22:75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynch B. P. An empirical assessment of Perrow's technology construct. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1974) 19(3):338–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K., Lee J., Pentland B. T., Dellarocas C., Wyner G., Quimby J., Osborne C., Bernstein A., Herman G., Klein M., O'Donnell E. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):425–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • McCormick E. J.Job Analysis: Methods and Applications (1979) (American Management Association, New York) Google Scholar
  • Montgomery D. C.Introduction to Statistical Process Control (1985) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Morris M. W., Murphy G. L. Converting operations on a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory and Cognition (1990) 18(4):407–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mossholder K. W., Arvey R. D. Synthetic validity: A conceptual and comparative review. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:322–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler G.Work Simplification (1957) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Oakland J. S.Statistical Process Control (1996) (Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Caldwell D. Informational influence as a determinant of task characteristics and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. (1979) 64:157–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Organizing moves software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):527–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(5):541–556LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Conceptualizing and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):857–870LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Rueter H. H. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):484–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T., Rueter H. H., Shabana A., Soe L., Ward S., Roldan M. Lexical and sequential variety in organizational processes: Some preliminary findings and propositions. (1994) . Presented at the Academy of Management, Division of Organization and Management Theory, Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1967) 32:194–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan T. P.Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement (1989) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Robey D. An empirical taxonomy of implementation processes based on sequences of events in information system development. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):548–576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G., Leblebici H., DiTomaso N., Bacharach S. B. Variety and form in organizing transactions: A generative grammar of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (1988) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Sankoff D., Kruskal J. B.Time Warps, Strings Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison (1983) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schacter D. L., Posner M. Memory. Foundations of Cognitive Science (1989) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 683–725Google Scholar
  • Sethi A. K., Sethi S. P. Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. Internat. J., Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1990) 2(4):289–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spradley J. P.The Ethnographic Interview (1979) (Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Taylor F. W.The principles of scientific management (1911) (Harper and Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven A., Delbeq A. A task-contingent model of work unit structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1974) 19:183–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A., Poole M. S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:510–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Withey M., Daft R. L., Cooper W. H. Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:45–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organizations: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.