Making a Difference: Organization as Design

References

• Akkermans H. Renga: A systems approach to facilitating interorganizational network development. System Dynam. Rev. (2001) 17:179–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer L. B., Cross N. Whatever became of design methodology. Developments in Design Methodology (1984) (Wiley, New York) 347–350Google Scholar
• Argyris C.Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change (1993) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Kaplan R. S. Implementing new knowledge: The case of activity-based costing. Accounting Horizons (1994) 8(3):83–105Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D. A.Organizational Learning (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA) Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Putnam R., McLain Smith D.Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention (1985) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banathy B. H.Designing Social Systems in a Changing World (1996) (Plenum, New York/London, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banathy B. H. Systems thinking in higher education: Learning comes to focus. Systems Res. Behavioral Sci. (1999) 16:133–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Kunda G. Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:363–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartunek J. M., Louis M. R.Insider/Outsider Team Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Beyer J. M., Trice H. M. The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:591–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom A.The Closing of the American Mind (1987) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Boland R. J. The process and product of system design. Management Sci. (1978) 24:887–898Link, Google Scholar
• Boland R. J. The experience of system design: A hermeneutic of organizational action. Scandinavian J. Management (1989) 5:87–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunge M.Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth (1967) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunge M.Causality and Modern Science (1979) 3rd rev. ed.(Dover Publications, New York) Google Scholar
• Burrell G., Morgan G.Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis (1979) (Heinemann, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Checkland P.Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (1981) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Checkland P., Scholes J.Soft Systems Methodology (1990) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Cross N.Developments in Design Methodology (1984) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B. Who is afraid of incommensurability? Organ. (1998) 5:273–275Google Scholar
• Denzin N. K., Morgan G. Interpretive interactionism. Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (1983) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 129–146Google Scholar
• Donaldson L.In Defense of Organization Theory: A Reply to the Critics (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Donaldson L.For Positivist Organization Theory: Proving the Hard Core (1996) (Sage, London, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. The myth of paradigm incommensurability in management studies: Comments by an integrationist. Organ (1998) 5:267–272Google Scholar
• Drucker P. F.The Practice of Management (1954) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Eden C., Huxham C., Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Nord W. R. Action research for the study of organizations. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, London, U.K.) 526–542Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:136–150Link, Google Scholar
• Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I., Whetten D. A. Perspectives on developing management theory, circa 1999: Moving from shrill monologues to (relatively) tame dialogues. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:627–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emery F. E., Trist E. L.Towards a Social Ecology (1972) (Penguin, Harmondsworth, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Endenburg G.Sociocracy as Social Design (1998) (Eburon, Delft, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Fabian F. H. Keeping the tension: Pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:350–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gergen K., Reed M., Hughes M. Organization theory in the post-modern era. Rethinking Organization (1992) (Sage, London, U.K.) 207–226Google Scholar
• Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M.The New Production of Knowledge (1994) (Sage, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Grey C. Re-imagining relevance: A response to Starkey and Madan. British J. Management (2001) 12:27–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillén M. F. Scientific management's lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the taylorized beauty of the mechanical. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:682–715Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacking I. Science turned upside down. New York Rev. Books (1986) 33(3Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. What if the academy actually mattered? Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:11–16Google Scholar
• Hatchuel A. The two pillars of new management research. British J. Management (2001) 12:33–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heller F. On the integration of the social sciences. Human Relations (2001) 54:49–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heron J., Reason P. A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry (1997) 3:274–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson G. P., Herriot P., Anderson N. Re-aligning the stakeholders in management research: Lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology. British J. Management (2001) 12:41–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff A. S. Changes in organizational knowledge production. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:288–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff A. S., Huff J. O. Re-focusing the business school agenda. British J. Management (2001) 12:49–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson M. C., Keys P. Towards a system of systems methodologies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1984) 35:473–486Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaques E.Measurement of Responsibility (1962) (Tavistock Publications, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Klir G., Lasker G. Systems methodology: From youthful to useful. Applied Systems and Cybernetics (1981) (Pergamon, New York) 931–938Google Scholar
• Knorr K. D. Tinkering toward success: Prelude to a theory of scientific practice. Theory Soc. (1979) 8:347–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K. D.The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (1981) (Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. J. Organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:632–657Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhn T.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) 2nd ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Latour B., Woolgar S.Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (1979) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Volberda H. W. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:519–534Link, Google Scholar
• Long J., Dowell J., Sutcliffe A., Macaulay L. Conceptions of the discipline of HCI: Craft, applied science, and engineering. People and Computers V (1989) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) 9–32Google Scholar
• Maani K. E., Cavana R. Y.Systems Thinking and Modelling: Understanding Change and Complexity (2000) (Prentice Hall, Auckland) Google Scholar
• MacIntosh R., MacLean D. Conditioned emergence: A dissipative structures approach to transformation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:297–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34:583–598Link, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. Quasi-natural organization science. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:352–380Link, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.The Sociology of Science (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Miner J. B. Participating in profound change. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:1420–1428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr L. B.Explaining Organizational Behavior: The Limits and Possibilities of Theory and Research (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Nadler G., Hibino S.Breakthrough Thinking (1990) (Prima, Rocklin, CA) Google Scholar
• Newell A., Simon H.Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M.Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2001) (Polity, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Numagami T. The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:2–15Link, Google Scholar
• Oliva R., Sterman J. D. Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Sci. (2001) 47:894–914Link, Google Scholar
• Parker M. Critique in the name of what? Postmodernism and critical approaches to organization. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16:553–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:599–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem R. L., Rosenstein J. Is organization theory obvious to practitioners? A test of one established theory. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:509–524Link, Google Scholar
• Romme A. G. L. Non-participation and system dynamics. System Dynam. Rev. (1995) 11:311–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romme A. G. L. Organizational learning, circularity, and double linking. Management Learning (1997) 28:149–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romme A. G. L. Domination, self-determination, and circular organizing. Organ. Stud. (1999) 20:801–832Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romme A. G. L. Organizing education by drawing on organization studies. Organ. Stud. (2003) 24:697–720Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romme A. G. L., Reijmer J. M. Kringorganiseren en het dilemma tussen centrale sturing en zelforganisatie. M&O, Tijdschrift voor Management en Organisatie (1997) 51(6):43–59Google Scholar
• Rudolph J. W., Repenning N. P. Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:1–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarbaugh-Thompson M., Feldman M. S. Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying “hi” really matter? Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:685–698Link, Google Scholar
• Schön D. A.Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions (1987) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Schwarz R. M.The Skilled Facilitator: Practical Wisdom for Developing Effective Groups (1994) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1996) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Starkey K., Madan P. Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British J. Management (2001) 12:3–6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor F. W.The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Tranfield D., Starkey K. The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British J. Management (1998) 9:341–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tranfield D., Parry I., Wilson S., Smith S., Foster M. Teamworked organisational engineering: Getting the most out of teamworking. Management Decision (1998) 36:378–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tranfield D., Smith S., Foster M., Wilson S., Parry I. Strategies for managing the teamworking agenda: Developing a methodology for team-based organisation. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2000) 65:33–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. The word and the world: A critique of representationalism in management research. Internat. J. Public Admin. (1998) 21:781–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. False dilemmas in organization theory: Realism or social constructivism? Organization (2000) 7:531–535Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Aken J. E. Improving the relevance of management research by developing tested and grounded technological rules. (2001) . Working paper 1.19, Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Van Aken J. E. Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for tested and grounded technological rules. J. Management Stud. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Van Vlissingen R. F. A management system based on consent. Human Systems Management (1991) 10:149–154Google Scholar
• Vennix J. A. M.Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics (1996) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Victor B., Boynton A., Stephens-Jahng T. The effective design of work under total quality management. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:102–117Link, Google Scholar
• Vince R. Power and emotion in organizational learning. Human Relations (2001) 54:1325–1351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:559–577Link, Google Scholar
• Warfield J.A Science of General Design (1990) (Intersystems Publishers, Salinas, CA) Google Scholar
• Warfield J., Cardenas R.A Handbook of Interactive Management (1994) (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British J. Management (2001) 12:71–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisbord M.Productive Workplaces: Organizing and Managing for Dignity, Meaning, and Community (1989) (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Weiss R. M. Taking science out of organization science: How would postmodernism reconstruct the analysis of organizations? Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:709–731Link, Google Scholar
• Wicks A. C., Freeman R. E. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:123–140Link, Google Scholar
• Wilber K.The Marriage of Sense and Soul (1998) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Zald M. N. Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:513–528Link, Google Scholar
• Ziman J.Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar