Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams

References

• Amason A. C. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:123–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Chong C.-L. Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behavior (1996) 18:251–284Google Scholar
• Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 167–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkins D., Boyer D., Handel M., Herbsleb J., Mockus A., Wills G. Achieving speed in globally distributed project work. (2002) . Paper presented at the Human Comput. Interaction Consortium, Winterpark, COGoogle Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blascovich J., Loomis J., Beall A. C., Swinth K. R. Immersive virtual environment technology as a research tool for social psychology. Psych. Inquiry (2002) 13:103–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouas K., Arrow H. The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Comput.-Supported Cooperative Work (1996) 4:153–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brehmer B. Social judgment theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psych. Bull. (1976) 83:985–1003Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L. Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quart. (1989) 20:143–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Brennan S. E., Resnick L., Levine J., Teasley S. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) 127–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23(3):239–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Attribution in distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 191–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Res. Organ. Behavior (1984) 6:191–233Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Trevino L. K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. (1987) 11:355–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Monge P. Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:693–703Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M. Conflicts: Productive and distructive. J. Soc. Issues (1969) 25:7–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeois L. J. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Rev. (1997) 39(2):42–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa A., Cadiz J., Rico-Gutierrez L., Lautenbacjer G., Kraut R., Scherlis L. Coming to the wrong decision quickly: Why awareness tools must be matches with appropriate tasks. (2000) Proc. Human Factors Comput. Systems, CHI'2000(ACM Press, New York) 392–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evan W. Conflict and performance in R&D organizations. Indust. Management Rev. (1965) 7:37–46Google Scholar
• Festinger L., Schacter S., Bach K.Social Pressures in Informal Groups (1950) (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fish R. S., Kraut R. E., Root R., Rice R. E. Video as a technology for informal communication. Comm. ACM (1993) 36:8–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fussell S. R., Krauss R. M. Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 62(3):378–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaver W. W., Moran T., MacLean A., Lovstrand L., Dourish P., Carter K. A., Buxon W. Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system. (1992) Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI'92)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Leyden D. P. Familiarity and group productivity. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76:578–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinter R. E., Herbsleb J. D., Perry D. E. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. (1999) . Paper presented at the 1999 SIGGROUP Conference, Phoenix, AZGoogle Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. W. The design of work teams. Handbook Of Organizational behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J. The cognitive and interpersonal costs of video. Media Psych. (1999) 1:283–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and the use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:373–393Link, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Comm. Res. (1996) 23(2):193–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink (1982) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S., Leidner D. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:256–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A quantitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):530–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Chatman J. A. The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2000) 11:56–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):236–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Chadwick C., Thatcher S. M. B. To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1997) 8:287–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karnoe P. Competence as process and the social embeddedness of competence building. (1995) Acad. Management Best Paper Proc.(Vancouver, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY) 427–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J. N., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kling R. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Comput. Surveys (1980) 12:61–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kling R., Rice R. E., Cool C., Fish R. S. Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(4):437–453Link, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fish R. S., Chalfonte B. Requirements and media choice in collaborative writing. Human Comput. Interaction (1992) 7:375–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fussel S. R., Brennan S. E., Seigel J., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(June):143–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace K., Shapiro D. L., Weingart L. R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:779–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A., Griffith T., Neale M. A., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 213–233Google Scholar
• Mark G., Grudin J., Poltrock S. E. Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. (1999) Proc. ECSCW'99, The 6th Eur. Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative WorkSeptemberCopenhagen, DenmarkCrossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life and work. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994a) 12:119–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994b) 5:502–527Link, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):583–598Link, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M. L. Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations (1994) 47(5):531–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:437–492Link, Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss M. M., Massey A. P., Song M. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1251–1262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M., Hinds P. J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2001) 12(3):212–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murnighan J. K., Conlon D. J. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson G. M., Olson J. S. Distance matters. Human Comput. Interaction (2000) 15:139–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson J. S., Teasley S. Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual colocation. (1996) Proc. Conf. Comput.-Supported Cooperative Work(The Association for Computing Machinery, New York) 419–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C., Williams K., Barsade S., Mannis E., Neale M. Group demography and innovation. Does diversity help? Research in the Management of Groups and Teams (1997) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for study technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:615–631Link, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Adler P. S. Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams: A conceptual model. IEEE Trans. Eng. Management (1994) 41(1):21–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J.Organizations and Organization Theory (1982) (Pitman, Marshfield, MA) Google Scholar
• Purdy J. M., Nye P., Balakrishnan P. V. The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2000) 11:162–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schober M. F., Fussell S., Krauss R. Different kinds of perspective-taking. Social and Cognitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Shah P. P., Jehn K. A. Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision Negotiation (1993) 2:149–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short J., Williams E., Christie B.The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., McGuire T. W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1986) 37:157–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T. L., Peterson R. S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:102–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Straus S., McGrath J. E. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:87–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas K. W., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 3(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 651–717Google Scholar
• Tinsley C. Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German and American cultures. J. Appl. Sci. (1998) 83:316–323Google Scholar
• Tyre M., von Hippel E. The situated nature of learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:71–83Link, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Comm. Res. (1994) 20:473–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B., Burgoon J. Relational communication in computermediated interaction. Human Comm. Res. (1992) 19:50–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B., Anderson J. F., Park D. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Comm. Res. (1994) 21:460–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisband S. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1992) 53:352–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisband S., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 311–333Google Scholar
• Williams K. Y., O'Reilly C. A., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–140Google Scholar
• Xie J., Song X. M., Stringfellow A. Interfunctional conflict, conflict resolution styles, and new product success: A fourculture perspective. Management Sci. (1998) 44:192–206Link, Google Scholar
• Zajonc R. B. Attitudinal effect of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1968) 9:2–17Crossref, Google Scholar