Experience-Based Top Management Team Competence and Sustained Growth

References

  • Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62(5):777–795Google Scholar
  • Allison G. T.Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1971) (HaperCollins Publishers)Google Scholar
  • Barnard C. I.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barney J. B., Busenitz L. W., Fiet J. O., Moesel D. D. New venture teams' assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms. J. Bus. Venturing (1996) 11:257–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berman S. L., Down J., Hill C. W. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):13–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biggadike R. E.Corporate Diversification: Entry, Strategy, and Performance (1979) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J., Eisenhardt K. M. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):816–835LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brüderl J., Preisendorfer P., Ziegler R. Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1992) 57:227–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter M. A., Sanders W. G., Gregersen H. B. Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(3):493–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias R. P., Helfat C. E. Managerial resources and rents. J. Management (1991) 17:155–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castanias R. P., Helfat C. E. The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Management (2001) 27:661–678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Certo S. T., Covin J. G., Daily C. M., Dalton D. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:641–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler G. N., Hanks S. H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing (1994) 9(4):331–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler G. N., Hanks S. H. An examination of the substitutability of founders' human and financial capital in emerging business ventures. J. Bus. Venturing (1998) 13:353–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper A. C., Bruno A. Success among high-technology firms. Bus. Horizons (1977) 20:16–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper A. C., Gimeno-Gascon F. J., Woo C. Y. Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing (1994) 9(5):371–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1504–1511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dowling M. J., McGee J. E. Business and technology strategies and new venture performance: A study of the telecommunications equipment industry. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1663–1677LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyke L. S., Fischer E. M., Reuber A. R. An inter-industry examination of the impact of owner experience on firm performance. J. Small Bus. Management (1992) 30(4):72–88Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, and growth among U.S. semi-conductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeois L. J., Hambrick D. C., Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. Navigating Change: How CEOs, Top Management Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation (1998) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) 141–169Google Scholar
  • Feeser H. R., Willard G. E. Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:87–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C.Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (1996) (West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN) Google Scholar
  • Geletkanycz M. A., Black S. S. Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. J. Management (2001) 27:3–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Rev. (1995) 37(3):110–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Cho S. T., Chen M.-J. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:659–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Geletkanycz M. A., Fredrickson J. W. Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:401–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris D., Helfat C. Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:895–920CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Price K. H., Bell M. P. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M. A., Tyler B. B. Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(Winter):327–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holbrook D., Cohen W. M., Hounshell D. A., Klepper S. The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1017–1041CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (1996) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jackson S. Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Adv. Strategic Management (1992) 8:345–382Google Scholar
  • Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-policy Decisions and Fiascoes (1972) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Johnston J., DiNardo J.Econometric Methods (1997) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:81–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazanjian R. K. Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(2):257–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kor Y. Y., Mahoney J. T. Penrose's resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. J. Management Stud. (2000) 37(1):109–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Summer):111–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahoney J. T. The management of resources and the resource of management. J. Bus. Res. (1995) 33:91–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahoney J. T., Pandian J. R. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(5):363–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGee J. E., Dowling M. J. Using R&D cooperative arrangements to leverage managerial experience: A study of technology-intensive new ventures. J. Bus. Venturing (1994) 9:33–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mosakowski E. A resource-based perspective on the dynamic strategy-performance relationship: An empirical examination of the focus and differentiation strategies in entrepreneurial firms. J. Management (1993) 19:819–839Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(Winter):61–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Reilly C., Synder R. C., Boothe J. N., Huber G., Glick W. Effects of executive team demography on organizational change. Organizational Change and Redesign (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) 147–175Google Scholar
  • Oster S. M.Modern Competitive Analysis (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pelled H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelz D. C., Andrews F. M.Scientists in Organizations (1966) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1995) 3rd ed.(John Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prescott E. C., Visscher M. Organizational capital. J. Political Economy (1980) 88:446–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson R. B., Pearce J. A. Product life-cycle considerations and the nature of strategic activities in entrepreneurial firms. J. Bus. Venturing (1976) 1:207–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roure J. B., Maidique M. A. Linking prefunding factors and high-technology venture success: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing (1986) 1:295–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza H. J., Grimm C. M. Founder characteristics, start-up process, and strategy/structure variables as predictors of shortline railroad performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (1997) 22(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schefczyk M., Gerpott T. J. Qualifications and turnover of managers and venture capital-financed firm performance: An empirical study of German venture capital-investments. J. Bus. Venturing (2001) 16:145–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Smith K. A., Olian J. D., Sims H. P., O'Bannon D. P., Scully J. A. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:412–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., Match J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally Publishers, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Hudson R., Schroeder D. M. Designing new business startups: Entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. J. Management (1984) 10(1):87–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West G. P., Meyer G. D. To agree or not to agree? Consensus and performance in new ventures. J. Bus. Venturing (1998) 13:395–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S. A. Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. J. Bus. Venturing (1996) 11:289–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger T. R., Lawrence B. S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions of technical communication. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(2):353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.