Weaving Together the Normative and Regulative Roles of Government: How the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund’s Responsible Conduct Is Shaping Firms’ Cross-Border Investments

References

• Aharoni Y (1981) Performance evaluation of state-owned enterprises: A process perspective. Management Sci. 27(11):1340–1347.Link, Google Scholar
• Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive Regulation (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Backer LC (2008) Norwegian sovereign wealth fund: Between private and public. Georgetown J. Internat. Law 40(1):1271–1280.Google Scholar
• Backer LC (2009) Sovereign wealth funds as regulatory chameleons: The Norwegian sovereign wealth funds and public global governance through private global investment. ExpressO working paper, http://works.bepress.com/larry_backer/9.Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Oliver C (1991) Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):187–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Chesterman C (2011) Laws, standards or voluntary guidelines. Nystuen G, Follesdal A, Mestad O, eds. Human Rights, Corporate Complicity and Disinvestment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 44–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen B (2009) Sovereign wealth funds and national security: The great tradeoff. Internat. Affairs 85(4):713–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole RE (1985) The macropolitics of organizational change: A comparative analysis of the spread of small group activities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(4):560–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global (2006) Recommendation of DRD Gold Limited (24 August 2006). Report, Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
• Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global (2009) Recommendation to reverse the exclusion of DRD Gold (13 February 2009). Report, Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Oliver C, Roy J-P (2007) The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management J. 28(2):169–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1996) Does isomorphism legitimate?. Acad. Management J. 39(4):1024–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Rajagopalan N (2011) An environmental perspective on diversification: The effects of chemical relatedness and regulatory sanctions. Acad. Management J. 54(1):97–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Dowd TJ (1997) How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):501–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Sutton JR (1998) The strength of a weak state: The rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(2):441–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin FR, Sutton JR, Meyer JW, Scott WR (1993) Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(2):396–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doh JP, Howton SD, Howton SW, Siegel DS (2010) Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information and legitimacy. J. Management 36(6):1461–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2010) Social capital for hire? mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organ. Sci. 21(3):677–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(6):1531–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB, Suchman MC (1997) The legal environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 23(1):479–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB, Abraham SE, Erlanger HS (1992) Professional construction of the legal environment: The inflated threat of wrongful discharge doctrine. Law Soc. Rev. 26(1):47–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellickson RC (1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans PB (1985) Transnational linkages and the economic role of the state: An analysis of developing and industrialized nations in the post-World War II period. Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T, eds. Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 192–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiorino DJ (1999) Rethinking environmental regulation. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 23(2):441–469.Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Miguel E (2007) Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. J. Political Econom. 115(6):1020–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1990) The Transformation of Corporate Control (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (2005) The political and economic sociology of international economic arrangements. Smelser N, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economics Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 183–204.Google Scholar
• Fowler SJ, Hope C (2007) A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact. J. Bus. Ethics 76(3):243–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson R, Milhaupt C (2008) Sovereign wealth funds and corporate governance: A minimalist response to the new mercantilism. Stanford Law Rev. 60(5):1345–1369.Google Scholar
• Gimeno J, Hoskisson RE, Beal BD, Wan WP (2005) Explaining the clustering of international expansion moves: A critical test in the U.S. telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 48(2):297–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Harris MN, Zhao X (2007) A zero-inflated ordered probit model, with an application to modeling tobacco consumption. J. Econom. 141(2):1073–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA (1993) Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):593–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Zelner BA, Guillén MF (2005) The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):871–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AW (1997) From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism (New Lexington Press, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of Panel Data (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Robinson J, Busch ML (2005) The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance, and embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3):824–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (2008) IMF intensifies work on sovereign wealth funds. Accessed December 15, 2012, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2008/pol03408a.htm.Google Scholar
• Jepperson RL (2002) Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Soc. Theory 20(1):61–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimmitt RM (2008) Public footprints in private markets. Foreign Affairs 87(1):119–130.Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin M (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):994–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotter J, Lel U (2011) Friends or foes? Target selection decisions of sovereign wealth funds and their consequences. J. Financial Econom. 101(2):360–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim A, Tsutsui K (2012) Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(1):69–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1984) The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 78(3):734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer AD (1982) Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(4):515–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Scott WR (1983) Organization Environments: Ritual and Rationality (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Norges Bank Investment Management (2010) Government Pension Fund Global annual report 2010. NBIM, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Finance (2003) The report from the Graver Committee. Report, Ministry of Finance, Oslo, Norway. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/fin/Selected-topics/the-government-pension-fund/responsible-investments/The-Graver-Committee—documents/Report-on-ethical-guidelines.html?id=420232.Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2009) Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Report No. 10 (2008–2009) to the Storting, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Managenment Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. 18(9):697–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polillo S, Guillén MF (2005) Globalization pressures and the state: The worldwide spread of central bank independence. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(6):1764–1802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potoski M, Prakash A (2004) Regulatory convergence in nongovernmental regimes? Cross-national adoption of ISO 14001 certification. J. Politics 66(3):885–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(3):559–586.Google Scholar
• Robinson M, Kleffner A, Bertels S (2011) Signaling sustainability leadership: Empirical evidence of the value of DJSI membership. J. Bus. Ethics 101(3):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W (2001) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Anderson BS (2010) The follower’s dilemma: Innovation and imitation in the professional services industry. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1175–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research concerns, implications and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny R (1994) Politicians and firms. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):995–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2009) Is there a better commitment mechanism than cross-listings for emerging-economy firms? Evidence from Mexico. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(7):1171–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skocpol T (1985) Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T, eds. Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 3–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute (2011) SWF Institute home page. Accessed April 4, 2011, http://www.swfinstitute.org/.Google Scholar
• Strang D, Meyer JW (1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc. 22(4):487–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strange S (1996) The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, Zucker LG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1):22–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wan WP, Yiu DW (2009) From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 30(7):791–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Davis GF, Lounsbury M (2009) Policy as myth and ceremony? The global spread of stock exchanges, 1980–2005. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1319–1347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1968) Economy and Society: An Interpretive Sociology (Bedminister Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Westney DE (1987) Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2001) Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):202–228.Crossref, Google Scholar