Be Careful What You Wish For: The Effects of Issue Interpretation on Social Choices in Professional Networks

References

• Ansoff HI (1979) Strategic Leadership. Strategic Management (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 125–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R, Kenny D (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conception, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becerra M, Gupta AK (2003) Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organ. Sci. 14(1):32–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger P, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Double Day, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Bolman LG, Deal TE (2008) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, 4th ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. Richardson JG, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Greenwood Press, New York), 241–258.Google Scholar
• Brandon DP, Hollingshead AB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. 15(6):633–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Brickson S (2005) Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):576–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridwell-Mitchell EN, Mezias SJ (2012) The quest for cognitive legitimacy and internal stakeholder support. J. Change Management 12(2):189–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Ingram P, Morris MW (2008) From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Acad. Management J. 51(3):436–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child D (2006) The Essentials of Factor Analysis, 3rd ed. (Contiuum International Publishing, London).Google Scholar
• Coffin GA (1997) The impact of district conditions on principals’ experientially-acquired professional learning. Dissertation Abstr. Internat. 59(6):1844–2033.Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psych. Bull. 112(1):155–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Cohen J, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital and the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley DT (2003) Who Governs Our Schools: Changing Roles and Responsibilities (Teachers College Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cross R, Sproull L (2004) More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. 15(4):446–462.Link, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Borgatti S, Parker A (2001) Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Soc. Networks 23(3):215–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis-Blake A, Pfeffer J (1989) Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):385–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dearborn DC, Simon HA (1958) Selective perception: A note on the departmental identification of executives. Sociometry 21(2):140–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J, Ashford S (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):397–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Jackson SE (1987) Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):76–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Fahey L, Narayanan VK (1983) Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. 4(4):307–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Walton EJ, Abrahamson E (1989) Important dimensions of strategic issues: Separating the wheat from the chaff. J. Management Stud. 26(4):379–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2008) Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ, eds. Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in Organizational and Social Sciences (Routledge Academic, New York), 143–164.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic decision-making. Strategic Management J. 13(S2):17–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GM, Shah J (2008) How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(2):319–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L (1992) Filling in the blanks: A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55(2):118–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Bielefeld W, Dowell M (2006) Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):337–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia D, Thomas J (1996) Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):370–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 778(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawley KE, Nicholas ML (1982) A contextual approach to modeling the decision to participate in a “political” issue. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(1):105–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hite JM, Williams EJ, Baugh SC (2005) Multiple networks of public school administrators: An analysis of network content and structure. Internat. J. Leadership Ed. 8(2):91–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Bown NJ, Maule AJ, Glaister KW, Pearman AD (1999) Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic cognition and decision-making under uncertainty. Strategic Management J. 20(10):977–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Andrews S (1993) Power, social influence and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):277–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Kilduff M, Tsai W (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):359–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Turrisi R (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, Dutton JE (1988) Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(3):370–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janicik GA, Larrick RP (2005) Social network schemas: The learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(2):348–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Judd CM (1984) Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psych. Bull. 96(1):201–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim WC, Mauborgne R (1998) Procedural justice, strategic decision-making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management J. 19(4):323–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant T (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Lant TK (2005) Organizational cognition and interpretation. Baum JAC, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 344–362.Google Scholar
• Lant T, Hurley A (1999) A contigency model of response performance feedback. Group Organ. Management 24(4):421–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laumann EO, Marsden PV, Prensky D (1983) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Burt RS, Minor MJ, eds. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 18–34.Google Scholar
• Lawrence BS (2006) Organizational reference groups: A missing perspective on social context. Organ. Sci. 17(1):80–100.Link, Google Scholar
• Leithwood K, Steinbach R (1995) Expert Problem Solving: Evidence from School and District Leaders (State University of New York Press, Albany).Google Scholar
• Lieberman A, McLaughlin MW (1992) Networks for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Phi Delta Kappan 73(9):673–677.Google Scholar
• Lin N (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEO’s advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Khanna P, Westphal JD (2008) Getting them to think outside the circle: Corporate governance, CEO’s external advice networks, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 51(3):453–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier KJ, O’Toole LJ (2001) Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 11(3):271–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW (1977) The effects of education as an institution. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1):55–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan VK, Fahey L (1982) The micro-politics of strategy formulation. Acad. Management Rev. 7(1):25–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nebus J (2006) Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):615–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutt PC (1998) Framing strategic decisions. Organ. Sci. 9(2):195–216.Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podaskoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell M, Ansic D (1997) Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. J. Econom. Psych. 18(6):605–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Renzulli LA, Aldrich H (2005) Who can you turn to? Tie activation within core business discussion networks. Soc. Forces 84(1):323–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt N (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psych. Assessment 8(4):350–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1):67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomas JB, McDaniel R (1990) Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information processing structure of top management teams. Acad. Management J. 38(2):286–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas JB, Shankster LJ, Mathieu J (1994) Antecedents to organizational issue interpretation: The roles of single-level, cross-level and content cues. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1252–1284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Watts DJ (1999) Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):493–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K (1976) Education organizations as loosely coupled systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Welch BL (1947) The generalization of “student’s” problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34(1–2):28–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter P, Malloy CL, Chau D, Polhemus JL (2003) Improving schools through networks: A new approach to urban school reform. Ed. Policy 17(4):399–430.Crossref, Google Scholar