The Double-Edged Nature of Board Gender Diversity: Diversity, Firm Performance, and the Power of Women Directors as Predictors of Strategic Change

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Amason AC (1996) Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 39(1):123–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amason AC, Sapienza HJ (1997) The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. J. Management 23(4):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff HI (1965) Corporate Strategy (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema HG, Vermeulen F (1998) International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Acad. Management J. 41(1):7–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker VL, Duhaime IM (1998) Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management J. 18(1):13–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr PS, Stimpert JL, Huff AS (1992) Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger BD, Kosnik RD, Turk TA (1991) Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Acad. Management J. 34(1):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benokraitis NV, Feagin JR (1995) Modern Sexism: Blatant, Subtle, and Covert Discrimination, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BR, Zelditch M (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilimoria D, Wheeler JV (2000) Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. Burke RJ, Mattis M, eds. Women in Management: Current Research Issues (Sage, London), 138–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackler F, McDonald S (2000) Power, mastery, and organizational learning. J. Management Stud. 37(6):833–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1997) Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):213–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner BL, Baumann MR, Dalal RS (2002) The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(2):719–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd BK, Gove S, Hitt MA (2005) Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? Strategic Management J. 26(3):239–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braiotta L, Sommer AA (1987) The Essential Guide to Effective Corporate Board Committees (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Burkhardt MR (1993) Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3):441–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KA (1998) Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke R (2000) Women on Canadian corporate boards of directors: Still a long way to go. Burke RJ, Mattis MC, eds. Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA (2000) The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. J. Management 26(6):1179–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 44(3):533–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Rev. 38(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2012) 2012 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women board directors. Report, Catalyst, New York.Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Dalton CM, Dalton DR, Lester RH (2008) Boards of directors’ self interest: Expanding for pay in corporate acquisitions? J. Bus. Ethics 77(2):219–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, 1st ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA (2001) Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(2):173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(1):vii–xvi.Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick D (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Cleveland JN, Stockdale M, Murphy KR (2000) Women and Men in Organizations: Sex and Gender Issues at Work (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement 20(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coltman T, Devinney TM, Midgley DF, Venaik S (2008) Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. J. Bus. Res. 61(12):1250–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Combs JG, Ketchen DJ, Perryman AA, Donahue MS (2007) The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition-firm performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 44(8):1299–1323.Google Scholar
• Cox TH, Lobel SA, McLeod PL (1991) Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Management J. 34(4):827–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Johnson JL (1997) Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. J. Management 23(2):97–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Certo ST, Dalton DR (1999) A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management J. 20(1):93–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Dalton DR, Cannella AA Jr (2003) Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):371–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aunno T, Sutton RI (1992) The responses of drug abuse treatment organizations to financial adversity: A partial test of the threat-rigidity thesis. J. Management 18(1):117–131.Google Scholar
• D’Aveni RA (1989) The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms. Acad. Management J. 32(3):577–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team effectiveness, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Jong SB, Van der Vegt GS, Molleman E (2007) The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust. J Appl. Psych. 92(6):1625–1637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y (2005) The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. J. Management 31(3):424–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Jung J (2011) Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Rev. 89(3):809–838.Google Scholar
• Dwyer S, Richard OC, Chadwick K (2003) Gender diversity in management and firm performance: The influence of growth orientation and organizational culture. J. Bus. Res. 56(12):1009–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enginsu ME, Dumoulin JCM, Pieters MHEC, Bras M, Evers JLH, Geraedts JPM (1991) Evaluation of human sperm morphology using strict criteria after Diff-Quik staining: Correlation of morphology with fertilization in vitro. Human Reproduction 6(6):854–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhardt NL, Werbel JD, Shrader CB (2003) Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance 11(2):102–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethier KA, Deaux K (1994) Negotiating social identity when contexts change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(2):243–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick D (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):484–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2003) Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Acad. Management Executive 17(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol CM, O’Connor EJ, Aguinis H (2001) All for one and one for all: The development and transfer of power across organizational levels. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):224–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fondas N, Wiersema MF (1997) Changing of the guard: The influence of CEO socialization on strategic change. J. Management Stud. 34(4):561–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes DP, Milliken FJ (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):489–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French JRP, Raven B (1959) The bases of social power. Cartwright D, ed. Studies in Social Power (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor), 150–167.Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz MA, Hambrick D (1997) The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):654–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. 17(1):150–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Ginsberg A (1988) Measuring and modeling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management J. 9(6):559–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladstein DL, Reilly NP (1985) Group decision making under threat: The tycoon game. Acad. Management J. 28(3):613–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden BR, Zajac EJ (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × Power = Strategic change. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodstein J, Boeker W (1991) Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(2):306–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodstein J, Gautam K, Boeker W (1994) The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 15(3):241–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2010) Positional rigidity: Low performance and resource acquisition in large and small firms. Strategic Management J. 32(1):103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Tesluk PE, Jacobs RR (1995) Bargaining cycles and work-related attitudes: Evidence for threat-rigidity effects. Acad. Management J. 38(6):1709–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith J (2004) Ineffective schools as organizational reactions to stress. Soc. Psych. Ed. 7(3):257–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Wageman R (2005) A theory of team coaching. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):269–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D (1981) Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(2):252–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Soc. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, and disparity in organization. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haynes KT, Hillman AJ (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heslin R (1964) Predicting group task effectiveness from member characteristics. Psych. Bull. 62(4):248–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hansen GS (1991) A longitudinal study of the causes and consequences of changes in diversification in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry 1977–1986. Strategic Management J. 12(3):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA Jr, Harris IC (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? J. Management 28(6):747–763.Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA Jr, Paetzold RL (2000) The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. J. Management Stud. 37(2):235–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Shropshire C, Cannella AA (2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Acad. Management J. 50(4):941–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Kim H (1997) International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 40(4):767–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofer CW, Schendel D (1978) Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts (West, St. Paul, MN).Google Scholar
• Hoffman L, Maier N (1961) Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 62(2):401–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (1992) The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity (Harvester Wheatsheaf/New York University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Management 33(6):987–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iaquinto A, Fredrickson J (1997) Top management team agreement about the strategic decision process: A test of some of its determinants and consequences. Strategic Management J. 18(1):63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson SE (1992) Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. Worchel S, Wood W, Simpson JA, eds. Group Process and Productivity (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 138–173.Google Scholar
• Jarvis CB, McKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 30(2):199–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K, Chadwick C, Thatcher S (1997) To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict in workgroup outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management 8(4):287–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Keats BW, Hitt MA (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. 31(3):570–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesner IF (1988) Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Acad. Management J. 31(1):66–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketchen DJ, Palmer TB (1999) Strategic responses to poor organizational performance: A test of competing perspectives. J. Management 25(5):683–706.Google Scholar
• Kimmel MS (2000) The Gendered Society (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski R, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 333–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ (2001) How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(5):632–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Latham SF, Braun M (2009) Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. J. Management 35(2):258–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):325–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Mauws MK, Dyck B, Kleysen RF (2005) The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):180–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockheed ME, Hall KE (1976) Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: Applications to leadership training strategies. J. Soc. Issues 32(3):111–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Meyer AD (1982) Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(4):515–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Burke LM, Glick WH (1998) Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management J. 19(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1991) Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. 37(1):34–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Friesen PH (1980) Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 23(4):591–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller TL, Triana M (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 46(5):755–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):402–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Vollrath D (1991) Strategic decision-making tasks and group effectiveness: Insights from theory and research on small groups. Human Relations 44(12):1229–1253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Morrison EW, Hewlin PF (2003) An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1453–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1983) Power In and Around Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mitchell W, Shaver JM, Yeung B (1992) Getting there in a global industry: Impacts on performance of changing international presence. Strategic Management J. 13(6):419–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen B (1983) Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 19(4):295–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler DA, Heilpern JD (1998) The CEO and the executive team: Managing unique dynamics and special demands. Nadler DA, Spencer JL, eds. Executive Teams (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco), 83–111.Google Scholar
• Olsen B, Sexton D (2009) Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts. Amer. Ed. Res. J. 46(1):9–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C, Snyder R, Boothe J (1993) Effects of executive team demography on organizational change. Huber G, Glick W, eds. Organizational Change and Redesign (Oxford University Press, New York), 147–175.Google Scholar
• Palmer TB, Danforth GW, Clark SM (1995) Strategic responses to poor performance in the health care industry: A test of competing predictions. Acad. Management Proc. 1995(Meeting abstract suppl):125–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park KM (2007) Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning: The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change. Organ. Sci. 18(3):386–402.Link, Google Scholar
• Parnell JA (1994) Strategic consistency versus flexibility: Does strategic change really enhance firm performance? Amer. Bus. Rev. 2(May):22–29.Google Scholar
• Pearce J, Zahra S (1992) Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. J. Management Stud. 29(4):411–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pegels CC, Song YI, Yang B (2000) Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 21(9):911–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson CA, Philpot J (2007) Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. J. Bus. Ethics 72(2):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A (1987) Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J. Management Stud. 24(6):649–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
• Qian G, Li J (2002) Multinationality, global market diversification, and profitability among the largest U.S. firms. J. Bus. Res. 55(4):325–335.Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC (2012) When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management J. 33(7):834–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Sundstrom E (1989) Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psych. Bull. 105(1):51–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N, Spreitzer GM (1997) Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):48–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritter BA, Yoder JD (2004) Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psych. Women Quart. 28(3):187–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Dechant K (1997) Building a business case for diversity. Acad. Management Executive 11(3):21–31.Google Scholar
• Schweiger DM, Sandberg WR, Ragan JW (1996) Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus. Acad. Management J. 29(1):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimizu K (2007) Prospect theory, behavioral theory, and the threat-rigidity thesis: Combinative effects on organizational decisions to divest formerly acquired units. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1495–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrader CB, Blackburn VB, Iles P (1997) Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. J. Managerial Issues 9(2):355–373.Google Scholar
• Simons R (1994) How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management J. 15(3):169–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallman S, Li J (1996) Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Acad. Management J. 39(1):179–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torchia M, Calabrò A, Huse M (2011) Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. J. Bus. Ethics 102(2):299–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis HC, Hall ER, Ewen RB (1965) Member heterogeneity and dyadic creativity. Human Relations 18(1):33–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Virany B, Romanelli E (1985) Executive succession, strategic reorientations, and organization evolution: The minicomputer industry as a case in point. Tech. Soc. 7(2–3):297–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Udueni H (1999) Power dimensions in the board and outside director independence: Evidence from large industrial UK firms. Corporate Governance 7(1):62–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):510–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. 48(3):532–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt GS, de Jong SB, Bunderson JS, Molleman E (2010) Power asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organ. Sci. 21(2):347–361.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Ang S, Botero IC (2003) Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1359–1392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R, Donnenfeld A (2007) Intervening in intra-team conflict. Behfar K, Thompson L, eds. Conflict in Organizational Groups (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL), 261–280.Google Scholar
• Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. 36(3):590–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webber SS, Donahue LM (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on workgroup cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. J. Management 27(2):141–162.Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Bednar MK (2005) Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firm’s strategic persistence to low firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):262–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Who directs strategic change: Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Seidel MDL, Stewart KJ (2001) Second-order imitation: Uncovering latent effects of board network ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):717–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. 35(1):91–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS (1993) A diametric forces model of strategic change: Assessing the antecedents and consequences of restructuring in the higher education industry. Strategic Management J. 14(S1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1996) Who shall succeed: How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Acad. Management J. 39(1):64–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelechowski DD, Bilimoria D (2001) Women corporate inside directors: Tokens at the top. Working paper, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.Google Scholar
• Zelechowski DD, Bilimoria D (2003) The experience of women corporate inside directors on the boards of Fortune 1000 firms. Women Management Rev. 18(7):376–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y (2006) The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management J. 27(3):283–300.Crossref, Google Scholar