Firms, Markets, and the State: Institutional Change and Manufacturing Sector Profitability Variances in India

References

• Amsden A (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Augustine VC (2009) Reserve Bank of India surveys on corporate statistics. IFC Bull. 30: Use of Surveys by Central Banks—Proc. IFC Workshops (Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland), 95–99.Google Scholar
• Baggs J, Brander J (2006) Trade liberalization, profitability, and financial leverage. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37:196–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Tolbert PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. 18:93–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhagwati J (1993) India in Transition: Freeing the Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhagwati J, Desai P (1970) Planning for Industrialization: A Study of India’s Trade and Industrial Policies Since 1950 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Bou JC, Satorra A (2007) The persistence of abnormal returns at industry and firm levels: Evidence from Spain. Strategic Management J. 28:707–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 47:239–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brito LA, Vasconcelos FC (2006) How much does country matter?Cooper A, Alvarez S, Carrera A, Mesquita LF, Vassolo R, eds. Entrepreneurial Strategies (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 95–113.Google Scholar
• Brush T, Bromiley P (1997) What does a small corporate effect mean? A variance components simulation of corporate and business effects. Strategic Management J. 18:825–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacar A, Vissa B (2005) Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business groups affiliation. Strategic Management J. 26:933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S, Hong J (2002) How much does the business group matter in Korea? Strategic Management J. 23:265–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S, Singh H (2000) Corporate and industry effects on business unit competitive position. Strategic Management J. 21:739–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-M, Lin F-J (2006) Sources of superior performance: Industry versus firm effects among firms in Taiwan. Eur. Planning Stud. 14:733–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chittoor R, Sarkar MB, Ray S, Aulakh PS (2009) Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 20:187–205.Link, Google Scholar
• Cobham D, Subramaniam R (1998) Corporate finance in developing countries: New evidence for India. World Development 26:1033–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das G (2002) India Unbound: The Social and Economic Revolution from Independence to the Global Information Age (Profile Books, New York).Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo JM (2002) Lobbying and information in politics. Bus. Politics 4:125–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diaz Hermelo F, Vassolo R (2010) Institutional development and hypercompetition in emerging economies. Strategic Management J. 31:1457–1473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diaz Hermelo F, Vassolo R (2012) How much does country matter in emerging economies? Evidence from Latin America. Internat. J. Emerging Markets 7:263–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earle T (1997) How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Evans P (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg SE, Majumdar SK (2001) Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 32:421–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes L (2006) India’s New Middle Classes: Democratic Politics in an Era of Economic Reform (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Fisman R (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91:1095–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Fruin WM (1994) The Japanese Enterprise System: Competitive Strategies and Cooperative Structures (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fukuyama F (2011) The Origins of Political Order (Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Gelman A (2005) Analysis of variance: Why it is more important than ever. Ann. Statist. 33:1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Cullis BR (1995) An efficient algorithm for REML estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics 51:1440–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glen J, Lee K, Singh A (2001) Persistence of profitability and competition in emerging markets. Econom. Lett. 72:247–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goto A (1982) Business groups in a market economy. Eur. Econom. Rev. 19:53–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Government of India (1985) Seventh Five-Year Plan (Planning Commission, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (2005) Business groups and social organisation. Smelser N, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 429–450.Google Scholar
• Griffin MA (1997) Interaction between individuals and situations: Using HLM procedures to estimate reciprocal relationships. J. Management 23:759–773.Google Scholar
• Guha R (2007) India After Gandhi (Picador Press, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Gutierrez RG, Carter S, Drukker DM (2001) On boundary-value likelihood-ratio tests. Stata Tech. Bull. 60:15–18.Google Scholar
• Haksar AN (1993) Bite the Bullet: Thirty-four Years with ITC (Viking, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Hartley HO, Rao JNK (1967) Maximum likelihood estimation for the mixed analysis of variance model. Biometrika 54:93–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawawini G, Subramanian V, Verdin P (2003) Is performance driven by industry- or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic Management J. 24:1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Todd PE (2009) A note on adapting propensity score matching and selection models to choice based samples. Econometrics J. 12:S230–S234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W, Zelner B (2005) Legitimacy, interest group pressures and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Acad. Management Rev. 30:361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W, Zelner B, Guillén M (2005) The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70:871–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24:825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Griffin MA, Gavin MB (2000) The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Klein KJ, ed. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 467–511.Google Scholar
• Jalan B (2005) The Future of India: Politics, Economics and Governance (Penguin Viking, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu KG (2005) The evolution of concentrated ownership in India: Broad patterns and a history of the Indian software industry. Morck RK, ed. The History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 283–324.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Rivkin J (2001) Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. 22:45–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Dansereau F, Hall RJ (1994) Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 19:195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenkar R (1981) A note on studentising a test for heteroscedasticity. J. Econometrics 17:107–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy A, Mudambi R, Saranga H, Tripathy A (2012) Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43:368–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal D (1999) Unfinished Business: India in the World Economy (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Lamont O (1997) Cash flow and investments: Evidence from internal capital markets. J. Finance 52:83–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leff NH (1978) Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Econom. Development Cultural Change 26:661–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieu P-T, Chi C-W (2006) How much does industry matter in Taiwan? Internat. J. Bus. 11:387–402.Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (1982) Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. 13:418–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little IMD, Mazumdar D, Page JM (1987) Small Manufacturing Enterprises: A Comparative Analysis of India and Other Economies (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Majumdar SK (2008) Foreign exchange legislation transformation and enterprise demography in India. Eur. J. Law Econom. 25:39–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majumdar SK (2012) India’s Late, Late Industrial Revolution: Democratizing Entrepreneurship (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majumdar SK, Sen K (2007) The debt wish: Rent seeking by business groups and the structure of corporate borrowing in India. Public Choice 131:209–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makino S, Isobe I, Chan C (2004) Does country matter? Strategic Management J. 25:1027–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mancke RB (1974) Causes of interfirm profitability differences: A new interpretation of the evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 88:181–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marathe SS (1989) Regulation and Development: India’s Policy Experience of Controls Over Industry (Sage, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Mauri AJ, Michaels MP (1998) Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. 19:211–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazumdar D, Sarkar S (2008) Globalization, Labor Markets and Inequality in India (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• McGahan A (2004) How Industries Evolve (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Porter ME (2002) What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Sci. 48:834–851.Link, Google Scholar
• McGahan A, Victer R (2010) How much does home country matter to corporate profitability? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41:142–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Elms H, Greckhamer T, LePine J (2006) A new perspective on a fundamental debate: A multi-level approach to industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Strategic Management J. 27:571–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi R, Navarra P (2003) Political culture and foreign direct investment: The case of Italy. Econom. Governance 4:37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi R, Navarra P, Paul CW (2002) Institutions and market reform in emerging economies: A rent seeking perspective. Public Choice 112:185–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller DC (1977) The persistence of profits above the norm. Economica 44:369–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murtha TP, Lenway SA (1994) Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations’ strategies. Strategic Management J. 15:113–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair K (1962) Blossoms in the Dust: The Human Factor in Indian Development (Praeger Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1991) Why do firms differ and why does it matter? Strategic Management J. 12:61–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1991) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• North DC, Thomas RP (1973) The Rise of the Western World (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16:145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panagariya A (2008) India: The Emerging Giant (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Parente S, Prescott EC (2002) Barriers to Riches (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Patel HM (2005) Rites of Passage: A Civil Servant Remembers (Rupa & Company, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Patel IG (2002) Glimpses of Indian Economic Policy: An Insider’s View (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell TC (1996) How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test. Strategic Management J. 17:323–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(May–June):79–91.Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd ed. (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Rao PSRS (1997) Variance and Covariance Components: Mixed Models, Methodologies and Applications (Chapman & Hall, London).Google Scholar
• Reid G (1987) Theories of Industrial Organization (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Roy T (2006) The Economic History of India: 1857–1947 (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1991) How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. 12:167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1985) Do markets differ much? Amer. Econom. Rev. 75:341–351.Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1989) Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 951–1009.Google Scholar
• Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer R (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45:659–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott JT, Pascoe G (1986) Beyond firm and industry effects on profitability in imperfect markets. Rev. Econom. Statist. 68:284–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance Components (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Self SG, Liang K-Y (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82:605–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A (1999) Development as Freedom (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Sengupta NK (1992) Unshackling Indian Industry: Towards Competitiveness Through Deregulation (Vision Books, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Short JC, Ketchen DJ, Bennett N, Du Toit M (2006) An examination of firm, industry, and time effects on performance using random coefficient modeling. Organ. Res. Methods 9:259–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slade M (2004) Competing models of firm profitability. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 22:289–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Murtha TP, Lenway SA (2005) How governments matter to new industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 30:321–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stram DO, Lee JW (1994) Variance components testing in longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50:1171–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J (1991) Sunk Costs and Market Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18:509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105:801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlinson BR (1993) The Economy of Modern India, 1860–1970 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (1997) Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS-Oriented Approach (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5:171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley R (1992) European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in Their National Contexts (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Wiggins RR, Ruefli TW (2002) Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organ. Sci. 13:81–105.Link, Google Scholar