Drift and Adjustment in Organizational Rule Compliance: Explaining the “Regulatory Pendulum” in Financial Markets

References

• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Bar Association (2012) Increased and reliable funding for the SEC and the CFTC. Letter to Congressional leaders (May 17), American Bar Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Gioia DA, Robinson SL, Treviño LK (2008) Reviewing organizational corruption. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):670–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Tolbert PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. 18(1):93–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Hansen MT (1996) The Red Queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):139–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth JR, Caprio G Jr, Levine R (2012) Guardians of Finance: Making Regulators Work for Us (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benn A (2000) The Unseen Wall Street of 1969–1975 (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Berman DK (2007) Why street bankers get away with repeating old mistakes. Wall Street Journal (November 6) C1.Google Scholar
• Billings RS, Milburn TW, Schaalman ML (1980) A model of crisis perception: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(2):300–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black BS (2001) The legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities markets. UCLA Law Rev. 48:781–855.Google Scholar
• Black WK (2005) The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is to Own One: How Corporate Executives and Politicians Looted the S&L Industry (University of Texas Press, Austin).Google Scholar
• Boin A, Schulman P (2008) Assessing NASA’s safety culture: The limits and possibilities of high-reliability theory. Public Admin. Rev. 68(6):1050–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bookstaber R (2008) A Demon of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge Funds, and the Perils of Financial Innovation (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Boston Consulting Group (2011) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission organizational study and reform. Report, Boston Consulting Group, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
• Bratton WW, Wachter ML (2010) The case against shareholder empowerment. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 158(3):653–728.Google Scholar
• Breyer S (1993) Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Carpenter D (2010) Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Carpenter DP (2001) The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1862–1928.Google Scholar
• Carpenter DP, Krause GA (2012) Reputation and public administration. Public Admin. Rev. 72(1):26–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for Responsive Politics (2012) Lobbying: Ranked sectors. Accessed November 29, 2012, http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?indexType=c.Google Scholar
• Chan LH, Chen KCW, Chen T-Y, Yu Y (2012) The effects of firm-initiated clawback provisions on earnings quality and auditor behavior. J. Accounting Econom. 54(2–3):180–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Citera GS (2007) Broker-dealer supervision: A new paradigm. Insights: Corporate Securities Law Advisor 21(7):1–9.Google Scholar
• Clinard MB, Yeager PC, Brissette J, Petrashek D, Harries E (1979) Illegal Corporate Behavior (U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Coffee JC Jr (2012) The political economy of Dodd–Frank: Why financial reform tends to be frustrated and systemic risk perpetuated. Cornell Law Rev. 97(5):1019–1082.Google Scholar
• Cornerstone Research (2012) Securities class action filings: 2011 year in review. Report, Cornerstone Research, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
• Cox JD (2006) The role of empirical evidence in evaluating the wisdom of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Univ. San Francisco Law Rev. 40(Summer):823–844.Google Scholar
• Croley SP (2008) Regulation and Public Interests: The Possibility of Good Regulatory Government (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das S (2010) Traders, Guns, and Money: Knowns and Unknowns in the Dazzling World of Derivatives, revised ed. (Pearson, London).Google Scholar
• DC Circuit Court (2006) Phillip Goldstein, et al., v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 451 F.3d 873.Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Crane D (1988) Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2008) Confessions of a risk manager. (August 9) 72–73.Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2012) An enlightening mistake. (May 19) 79.Google Scholar
• Faerman SR, McCaffrey DP, Van Slyke DM (2001) Understanding interorganizational cooperation: Public-private collaboration in regulating financial market innovation. Organ. Sci. 12(3):372–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011) The financial crisis inquiry report: Final report of the National Commission on the causes of the financial and economic crisis in the United States. Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2012) FINRA statistics. Accessed November 29, 2012, http://www.finra.org/Newsroom/Statistics/.Google Scholar
• Financial Services Authority (2008) Final notice: Credit Suisse International and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited. Memo (August 13), Financial Services Authority, London. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/credit_suisse.pdf.Google Scholar
• Forrester JW (1961) Industrial Dynamics (Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fried J, Shilon N (2011) Excess-pay clawbacks. J. Corporation Law 36(4):721–751.Google Scholar
• Gallagher DM (2012) Remarks at the 44th Annual Rocky Mountain Securities Conference. Accessed October 13, 2012, http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1365171490224#.UflFdyfD-t8.Google Scholar
• Gasparino C (2009) The Sellout: How Three Decades of Wall Street Greed and Government Mismanagement Destroyed the Financial System (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Gentin P, Pedowitz L, Thomsen L, Washer H, Weiss H, White MJ (2011) Litigation update: Regulatory and criminal (TB-1). Panel Presentation at Securities Industries and Financial Markets Association Compliance and Legal Society 2011 Annual Seminar, March 22, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, New York.Google Scholar
• Glover JM (2012) The structural role of private enforcement mechanisms in public law. William & Mary Law Rev. 53(4):1137–1217.Google Scholar
• Govtrack (2012) Text of H.R. 4173 (111th): Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Accessed September 14, 2012, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr4173/text.Google Scholar
• Hilgartner S, Bosk CL (1988) The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(1):53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Kelley PC, Agle BR, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) An empirical examination of the causes of corporate wrongdoing in the United States. Human Relations 45(10):1055–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hittinger CW, Bona JM (2008) The diminishing role of the private attorney general in antitrust and securities class action cases aided by the supreme court. J. Bus. Tech. Law 4(1):167–186.Google Scholar
• Ho K (2009) Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Hung AA, Clancy N, Dominitz J, Talley E, Berrebi C, Suvankulov F (2008) Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers (Rand Institute for Civil Justice, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
• infogroup/ORC (2010) U.S. investors and the fiduciary standard: A national opinion survey. Report, infogroup/ORC, Papillion, NE.Google Scholar
• Jackall R (1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P (2008) Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Acad. Management J. 51(4):621–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jewell M (2008) Regulators sue lenders over mortgage practices. Albany Times Union (February 19):C1–C2.Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Kwak J (2011) 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Karmel RS (2008) Should securities industry self-regulatory organizations be considered government agencies? Working paper, Brooklyn Law School, Brooklyn, NY. http://papers.ssrn.com/so13/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1128329.Google Scholar
• Karpoff JM, Lee DS, Martin GS (2008a) The cost to firms of cooking the books. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 43(3):581–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karpoff JM, Scott Lee D, Martin GS (2008b) The consequences to managers for financial misrepresentation. J. Financial Econom. 88(2):193–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane C (1993) The impact of financial performance on frequency of corporate crime: A latent variable test of strain theory. Canadian J. Criminol. 35(3):293–308.Google Scholar
• Kedrosky P, Stangler D (2011) Financialization and Its Entrepreneurial Consequences (Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khuzami R (2011) Remarks before the Consumer Federation of America’s Financial Services Conference. Accessed December 1, 2012, http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2011/spch120111rk.htm.Google Scholar
• Krawiec KD (2013) Don’t “screw Joe the Plummer”: The sausage-making of financial reform. Arizona Law Rev. 55:53–103.Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov A (2007) The Complete Guide to Capital Markets for Quantitative Professionals (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lange D (2008) A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):710–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langevoort DC (1996) Selling hope, selling risk: Some lessons for law from behavioral economics about stockbrokers and sophisticated customers. Calif. Law Rev. 84(3):627–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langevoort DC (2007) The social construction of Sarbanes–Oxley. Michigan Law Rev. 105(8):1817–1855.Google Scholar
• Langevoort DC (2011) Chasing the greased pig down Wall Street: A gatekeeper’s guide to the psychology, culture, and ethics of financial risk-taking. Cornell Law Rev. 96(5):1209–1246.Google Scholar
• LaPorte TR, Consolini PM (1991) Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of “high reliability organizations.” J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 1(1):19–48.Google Scholar
• Latour B (1986) The powers of association. Law J, ed. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London), 264–280.Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and institutional work. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR, eds. Handbook of Organizational Studies, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 215–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B, eds. (2009) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ljungqvist A, Marston F, Starks LT, Wei KD, Yan H (2007) Conflicts of interest in sell-side research and the moderating role of institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 86(2):420–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomis C (1994) The risk that won’t go away. Fortune (March 7) 40–57.Google Scholar
• Louria A (2007) Money to burn. Investment Dealers’ Digest (April 2):15–19.Google Scholar
• Lukes S (2005) Power: A Radical View, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Schulz M, Zhou X (2000) The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masuch M (1985) Vicious circles in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(1):14–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCaffrey DP (2011) Regulatory issues in institutional investment management. Shawky HA, Smith DM, eds. Institutional Money Management: An Inside Look at Strategies, Players, and Practices (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 13–33.Google Scholar
• McCaffrey DP, Hart DW (1998) Wall Street Polices Itself: How Securities Firms Manage the Legal Hazards of Competitive Pressures (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• McCaffrey DP, Smith AE, Martinez-Moyano IJ (2007) Then let’s have a dialogue: Interdependence and negotiation in a cohesive regulatory system. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 17(2):307–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCaffrey DP, Andersen DF, McCold P, Doa Hoon K (1985) Modeling complexity: Using dynamic simulation to link regression and case studies. J. Policy Anal. Management 4(2):196–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCraw T (1984) Prophets of Regulation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• McKendall MA, Wagner JA III (1997) Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organ. Sci. 8(6):624–647.Link, Google Scholar
• McKendall M, DeMarr B, Jones-Rikkers C (2002) Ethical compliance programs and corporate illegality: Testing the assumptions of the corporate sentencing guidelines. J. Bus. Ethics 37(4):367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller MH (1986) Financial innovation: The last twenty years and the next. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 21(4):459–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller S (2012) Firms face challenges “clawing back” compensation. Soc. Human Resource Management (August 27) http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/compensation/articles/ pages/clawing-back-compensation.aspx.Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Weaver GR, Elms H (2008) Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):750–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison and Foerster (2013) Report of investigation of Louis J. Freeh, Chapter 11 trustee of MF Global Holdings Ltd., et al. Report prepared for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, New York.Google Scholar
• Morrison AD, Wilhelm J, William J (2007) Investment Banking: Institutions, Politics, and Law (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• New York Stock Exchange (2006a) Exchange Hearing Panel decision 05-169/170. Report, New York Stock Exchange, New York. http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/05-169-170.pdf.Google Scholar
• New York Stock Exchange (2006b) Exchange Hearing Board decision 06-156. Report, New York Stock Exchange, New York. http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/06-156.pdf.Google Scholar
• NYSE Euronext (2012) NYSE enforcement. Accessed March 14, 2012, http://www.nyse.com/DiscAxn/discAxnIndex.html.Google Scholar
• Oliva R (2001) Tradeoffs in responses to work pressure in the service industry. Calif. Management Rev. 43(4):26–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Sterman JD (2001) Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Sci. 47(7):894–914.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Neil PD, Krane D (2012) Policy and organizational change in the federal aviation administration: The ontogenesis of a high-reliability organization. Public Admin. Rev. 72(1):98–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker C, Nielsen V (2009) The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 5(1):45–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker C, Nielsen VL, eds. (2011) Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patterson S (2012) Dark Pools: High-Speed Traders, A.I. Bandits, and the Threat to the Global Financial System (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Perin C (2005) Shouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1994) Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Project on Government Oversight (2011) Revolving regulators: SEC faces ethics challenges with revolving door. Project on Government Oversight, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Sci. 27(2):183–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reason J (1997) Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents (Ashgate Publishing, Burlington, VT).Google Scholar
• Rebonato R (2007) Plight of the Fortune Tellers: Why We Need to Manage Financial Risk Differently (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2009) This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Repenning NP (2000) Drive out fear (unless you can drive it in): The role of agency and job security in process improvement. Management Sci. 46(11):1385–1396.Link, Google Scholar
• Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards L (2008) Frequently-asked questions about SEC examinations. Accessed December 7, 2012, http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2008/spch011708lar.htm.Google Scholar
• Richardson GP (1991) Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Richardson GP (2011) Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynam. Rev. 27(3):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts KH (1990a) Managing high reliability organizations. Calif. Management Rev. 32(4):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts KH (1990b) Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organ. Sci. 1(2):160–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts KH, Stout SK, Halpern JJ (1994) Decision dynamics in two high reliability military organizations. Management Sci. 40(5):614–624.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Repenning NP (2002) Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sastry MA (1997) Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):237–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission Staff (2011) Study on investment advisers and broker-dealers. Report, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2011/913studyfinal.pdf.Google Scholar
• Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (2007) Securities industry employment and compensation trends. Report, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, New York.Google Scholar
• Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (2012) Key industry statistics. Report, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, New York.Google Scholar
• Seligman J (2003) The Transformation of Wall Street: A History of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Modern Corporate Finance (Aspen, New York).Google Scholar
• Senior Supervisors Group (2008) Observations on risk management practices during the recent market turbulence. Report, Financial Stability Forum, Basel, Switzerland. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/report030608.pdf.Google Scholar
• Senior Supervisors Group (2009) Risk management lessons from the global banking crisis of 2008. Report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2009/report102109.pdf.Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (2011) “I’ve got a theory paper—Do you?”: Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1312–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Shiller RJ (2012) Finance and the Good Society (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Société Générale (2008) Mission Green: Summary report. Report, General Inspection Department, Société Générale, Paris. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://blog.unnoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/SG_JK.pdf.Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sterman JD, Repenning NP, Kofman F (1997) Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Sci. 43(4):503–521.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD, Henderson R, Beinhocker ED, Newman LI (2007) Getting big too fast: Strategic dynamics with increasing returns and bounded rationality. Management Sci. 53(4):683–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Stewart J (1991) Den of Thieves (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Taibbi M (2011) Why isn’t Wall Street in jail? Rolling Stone (March 3):44–51.Google Scholar
• Turan E, Kasner J, Pietrzak R, Dickey J (2007) Recent developments in litigation. Panel presentation at Securities Industries and Financial Markets Association Compliance and Legal Division 2011 Conference, March 22, 2011, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, New York.Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2005) Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1143–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• UBS (2008) Shareholder report on UBS’s write-downs. Report, UBS, Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2012) Order instituing proceedings pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act making findings and imposing remedial sanctions. CFTC Docket 13-09, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, DC. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/ documents/legalpleading/enfubsorder121912.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (1997) OTC derivatives: Additional oversight could reduce costly sales practice disputes. Report GGD-98-5, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2009) Financial regulation: A framework for crafting and assessing proposals to modernize the outdated U.S. financial regulatory system. Report GAO-09-216, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2011a) Securities and Exchange Commission: Existing post-employment controls could be further strengthened. Report GAO-11-654, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2011b) Securities fraud liability of secondary actors. Report GAO-11-664, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2012a) Securities regulation: Opportunities exist to improve SEC’s oversight of the financial industry regulatory authority. Report GAO-12-625, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2012b) Securities research: Additional actions could improve regulatory oversight of analyst conflicts of interest. Report GAO-12-209, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. House Committee on Financial Services (2003) Mutual funds: Who’s looking out for investors? Hearing before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, 108th Cong., 1st session (November 6, 8).Google Scholar
• U.S. House Committee on Financial Services (2007) Hedge funds and systemic risk: Perspectives of the president’s working group on financial markets. Hearing before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, 110th Cong., 1st session (July 11).Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2008a) SEC’s oversight of Bear Stearns and related entities: The Consolidated Supervised Entity Program. Report 446-A, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www.sec-oig.gov/Reports/AuditsInspections/2008/446-a.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2008b) SEC’s oversight of Bear Stearns: Broker-dealer risk assessment program. Report 446-B, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www.sec-oig.gov/Reports/AuditsInspections/2008/446-b.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2012) About the SEC. Accessed May 29, 2012, http://www.sec.gov/about.shtml.Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (2011) Wall Street and the financial crisis: Anatomy of a financial collapse. Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (2013) JPMorgan Chase whale trades: A case history of derivatives risk and abuses. Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Vardi Y, Weitz E (2004) Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Vaughan D (1998) Rational choice, situated action, and the social control of organizations. Law Soc. Rev. 32(1):23–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan D (1999) The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:271–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999a) Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Acad. Management J. 42(1):41–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999b) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad. Management J. 42(5):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2007) Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Weiss DM (2006) Re-examining the SEC’s use of obey-the-law injunctions. Univ. Calif.-Davis Bus. Law J. 7:239–283.Google Scholar
• Woo DM, Vicente KJ (2003) Sociotechnical systems, risk management, and public health: Comparing the North Battleford and Walkerton outbreaks. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 80(3):253–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2012) The financial development report 2012. Report, World Economic Forum, Geneva. Accessed August 14, 2013, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FinancialDevelopmentReport_2012.pdf.Google Scholar