Autonomy or Control? Organizational Architecture and Corporate Attention to Stakeholders

References

• Adams RB, Licht AN, Sagiv L (2011) Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management J. 32(12):1331–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Anand J, Bercovitz J, Croson R (2012) Spillovers across organizational architectures: The role of prior resource allocation and communication in post-acquisition coordination outcomes. Strategic Management J. 33(6):710–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Acad. Management J. 42(5):507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi JJ (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Greve HR (2007) A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Roberts J (2001) Organizational design: Decision rights and incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):200–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baayen RH (2008) Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management J. 43(4):717–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):960–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr PS, Stimpert JL, Huff AS (1992) Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26:611–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CR, Kahl SJ (2013) The process of schema emergence: Assimilation, deconstruction, unitization and the plurality of analogies. Acad. Management J. 56(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Morrison A, Birkinshaw J (2009) International attention and multinational enterprise performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(1):108–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Bower JL (1970) Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment (HBS Division of Research, Boston).Google Scholar
• Carley K (1997) Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 18:(S1):533–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Cressey DR (1950) The criminal violation of financial trust. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 15(6):738–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Sloan P (2012) Corporate attention to stakeholders: Enterprise logic and an inside-out explanation. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1174–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Aveni RA, MacMillan IC (1990) Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):634–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L (1995) American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar RLM, Starbuck WH (2006) Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organ. Sci. 17(2):171–178.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, Wierba EE, O’Neil R, Hayes E (1997) Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for issue selling to top managers. Strategic Management J. 18(5):407–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective and the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing the role of conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):154–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, de Colle S (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: An information processes view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Metaorganization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33:571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harman HH (1967) Modern Factor Analysis, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1999) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Huy QN (2002) Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Ocasio W (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General Electric from 1951–2001. Strategic Management J. 33(6):633–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover power and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 30(3):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Labroo AA, Lambotte S, Zhang Y (2009) The “name-ease” effect and its dual impact on importance judgments. Psych. Sci. 20(12):1516–1522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakoff RT (2000) The Language War (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindenburg S, Foss NJ (2011) Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):500–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindesmith AR (1952) Two comments on W.S. Robinson’s The logical structure of analytic induction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 17(4):492–493.Google Scholar
• Maher MT (2001) Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. Reese SD, Gandy OH, Grant AE, eds. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 83–94.Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Eisenhardt KM (2010) Rewiring: Cross-business collaboration and performance in multi-business organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(2):265–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel AA (2007) A distributed cognition perspective on newcomers’ change processes: The management of cognitive uncertainty in two investment banks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):507–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Minsky M (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. Winston PH, ed. The Psychology of Computer Vision (McGraw-Hill, New York), 211–277.Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Barr PS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1395–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nigam A, Ocasio W (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: Analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform. Organ. Sci. 21(4):823–841.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Hackman JR (2010) Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. J. Organ. Behav. 31(2–3):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Pitcher P, Chreim S, Kisfalvi V (2000) CEO succession research: Methodological bridges over troubled waters. Strategic Management J. 21(6):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollach I (2010) Software review: Wordstat 5.0. Organ. Res. Methods 14(4):741–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raes AM, Heijltjes MG, Glunk U, Roe RR (2011) The interface of the top management team and middle managers: A process model. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):102–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reger RK, Palmer TB (1996) Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organ. Sci. 7(1):22–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Romney AK, Boyd JP, Moore CC, Batchelder WH, Brazill TJ (1996) Culture as shared cognitive representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(10):4699–4705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouleau L (2005) Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. J. Management Stud. 42(7):1413–1441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S, Baldo J, Graves RE, Brugger P (2003) Pervasive influence of semantics in letter and category fluency: A multidimensional approach. Brain Language 87(3):400–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search. Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163(4148):688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Snow DA, Benford RD (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. Internat. Soc. Movement Res. 1:197–217.Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2011) Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 32(8):849–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Meyer AD, Schoonhoven CB (2006) A future for organization theory: Living in and living with changing organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(5):657–671.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. 17(4):514–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 81–123.Google Scholar
• Znaniecki F (1934) The Method of Sociology (Farrer & Rinehart, New York).Google Scholar