The Focused Organization of Advice Relations: A Study in Boundary Crossing

References

• Agneessens F, Wittek R (2012) Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Soc. Networks 34(3):333–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Kane AA (2009) Superordinate identity and knowledge creation and transfer in organizations. Foss NJ, Michailova S, eds. Knowledge Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 166–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael FA (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Corley KG (2008) Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. J. Management 34(3):325–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Roger KM, Corley KG (2011) Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1144–1156.Link, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Lee K-H (2002) Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity. Soc. Psych. Quart. 65(3):226–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN (2004) Employing identities in organizational ecology. Indust. Corporate Change 13(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Podolny JM (1997) Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(5):673–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA (2001) Social comparison in boundary spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):379–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergami M, Bagozzi RP (2000) Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British J. Soc. Psych. 39(Part 4):555–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 36(2):96–127.Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6):795–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiger R (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53(2):181–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The Social Life of Information (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BusinessWeek (2006) 2006 Europe’s hot growth scoreboard. Retrieved November 15, 2006, http://bwnt.businessweek.com/europe_hot_growth/2006/index.asp?chan=search.Google Scholar
• Contractor NS, Wasserman S, Faust K (2006) Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Management J. 31(3):681–703.Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Thatcher SMB (2010) Identification in organizations: The role of self-concept orientations and identification motives. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):516–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Cummings JN (2003) Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Soc. Networks 25(3):197–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Sproull L (2004) More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. 15(4):446–462.Link, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Borgatti SP, Parker A (2001) Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Soc. Networks 23(3):215–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Nohria N, Parker A (2002) Six myths about informal networks—And how to overcome them. Sloan Management Rev. 43(3):67–75.Google Scholar
• Davis JA (1970) Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 35(5):843–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Kane AK, Tortoriello M (2013) One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organ. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Dukerich JM, Golden BR, Shortell SM (2002) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):507–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5):1015–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1982) Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(6):797–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank O, Strauss D (1986) Markov graphs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(395):832–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Mors ML, Lovas B (2005) Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Management J. 48(5):776–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Carley KM, Krackhardt D, Wholey D (2000) Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81(2):226–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2002) Social identity theory and organizations. Hogg MA, Terry DJ, eds. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (Psychology Press, Philadelphia), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Hunter DR, Handcock MS (2006) Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. J. Computational Graphical Statist. 15(3):565–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter DR, Goodreau SM, Handcock MS (2008) Goodness of fit of social network models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(481):248–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1999) Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):764–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Simons T (2002) The transfer of experience in groups of organizations: Implications for performance and competition. Management Sci. 48(12):1517–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane AA (2010) Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ. Sci. 21(3):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (1994) Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 37(1):87–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (2008) Interpersonal Networks in Organizations: Cognition, Personality, Dynamics, and Culture (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML (2007) Building bridges: The social structure of interdependent innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):103–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koskinen J, Lomi A (2013) The local structure of globalization—The network dynamics of foreign direct investments in the international electricity industry. J. Statist. Physics 151(3):523–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1987) QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Soc. Networks 9(2):171–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1988) Predicting with networks: Nonparametric regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc. Networks 10(4):359–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer RM (1993) Cooperation and organizational identification. Murnighan JK, ed. Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 244–268.Google Scholar
• Lazega E (2001) The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazega E, Pattison PE (1999) Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Soc. Networks 21(1):67–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazega E, Mounier L, Snijders TAB, Tubaro P (2012) Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: A case study. Soc. Networks 34(3):323–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Miller J (1979) Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):181–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lomi A, Snijders TAB, Torló VJ, Steglich CEG (2011) Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Soc. Sci. Res. 40(6):1506–1520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G, eds. (2013) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mael FA, Ashforth BE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13(2):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mael FA, Ashforth BE (1995) Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psych. 48(2):309–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• McPherson MM, Ranger-Moore JR (1991) Evolution on a dancing landscape: Organizations and networks in dynamic Blau space. Soc. Forces 70(1):19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (1998) At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad. Management J. 41(4):441–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2002) Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social networks during socialization. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nebus J (2006) Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):615–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RE (1989) The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad. Management J. 32(2):377–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Ghoshal S (1997) The Differentiated Network: Organizations Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP (1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pallotti P, Lomi A, Mascia D (2013) From network ties to network structures: Exponential random graph models of interorganizational relations. Quality Quantity 47(3):1665–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park J, Newman MEJ (2004) Solution of the two-star model of a network. Physical Rev. E 70(6):066146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pattison PE, Robins GL (2002) Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociol. Methodol. 32(1):302–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rank ON, Robins GL, Pattison PE (2010) Structural logic of intra-organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 21(3):745–764.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):101–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riketta M, Van Dick R (2005) Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. J. Vocational Behav. 67(3):490–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins G, Daraganova G (2013) Social selection, dyadic covariates, and geospatial effects. Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G, eds. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York), 91–101.Google Scholar
• Robins G, Snijders TAB, Wang P, Handcock M, Pattison P (2007) Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Networks 29(2):192–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins GL, Pattison PE, Wang P (2009) Closure, connectivity and degrees: New specifications for exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Soc. Networks 31(2):105–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44(2):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif A (1954) Experiments in group conflict. Sci. Amer. 195:54–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M (1958) Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. Amer. J. Sociol. 63(4):349–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Hansen MT, Podolny JM (2010) The world is not small for everyone: Inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations. Management Sci. 56(9):1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB (2002) Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. J. Soc. Structure 3(2). http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/Snijders.pdf.Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB (2011) Statistical models for social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 37:131–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Lomi A, Torló VJ (2013) Model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preferences, friendship and advice. Soc. Networks 35(2):265–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodol. 36(1):99–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter special issue):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 1(2):149–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J (1967) Organizations in action. Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai WP (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai WP (2002) Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. 13(2):179–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader S (2000) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (Psychology Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Pattison PE (1996) Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: An introduction to Markov graphs and p-star. Psychometrika 61(3):401–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Robins G (2005) An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S, eds. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York), 148–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):628–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H (1992) Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Link, Google Scholar