Diffusion as Classification

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0851

References

  • Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abrahamson E, Eisenman M (2008) Employee-management techniques: Transient fads or trending fashions? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):719–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abrahamson E, Fairchild G (1999) Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):708–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management J. 18(3):487–517.Google Scholar
  • Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. 8(3):289–309.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA (1980) A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quart. J. Econom. 94(4):749–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari SM, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):67–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R, Cohen MD (1999) Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bacharach M, Gambetta D (2001) Trust in signs. Cook KS, ed. Trust in Society (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 148–184.Google Scholar
  • Baron JN, Dobbin FR, Jennings PD (1986) War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsalou LW (1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory Cognition 11(3):211–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsalou LW (1991) Deriving categories to achieve goals. Bower GH, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Academic Press, San Diego), 1–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsalou LW (2010) Ad hoc categories. Hogan PC, ed. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 86–87.Google Scholar
  • Bearman PS, Brückner H (2001) Promising the future: Virginity pledges and first intercourse. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):859–912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biggart NW, Beamish TD (2003) The economic sociology of conventions: Habit, custom, practice, and routine in market order. Annual Rev. Sociol. 29:443–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowker GC, Star SL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boxenbaum E, Jonsson S (2008) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 78–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemens ES, Cook JM (1999) Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:441–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colyvas JA, Jonsson S (2011) Ubiquity and legitimacy: Disentangling diffusion and institutionalization. Sociol. Theory 29(1):27–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • David RJ, Bitektine AB (2009) The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? Exploring divergent agendas in institutional research. Buchanan DA, Bryman A, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (Sage, London), 160–175.Google Scholar
  • Davis GF (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):583–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Anderson PJJ (2008) Social movements and failed institutionalization: Corporate (non)response to the AIDS epidemic. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 371–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Greve HR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse DL, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 49–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Kovács B (2008) Selective sampling of empirical settings in organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):109–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P, Garip F (2011) How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(6):1887–1933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas M (1986) How Institutions Think (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY).Google Scholar
  • Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Jackson SE (1987) Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):76–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, March JG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(2):171–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol CM, Romanelli E (2012) Before identity: The emergence of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 23(3):597–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer A (2009) Ambiguity and the equity of rating systems: United States brokerage firms, 1995–2000. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):555–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N (1985) The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50(3):377–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foucault M (2006) History of Madness (Routledge, Abingdon, UK). [Orig. pub. 1972. Histoire de la Folie à l’âge classique (Editions Gallimard, Paris).]Google Scholar
  • Frazis H (2002) Human capital, signaling, and the pattern of returns to education. Oxford Econom. Papers 54(2):298–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2011) Fast and expensive: The diffusion of a disappointing innovation. Strategic Management J. 32(9):949–968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hacking I (2006) Making up people. London Rev. Books 28(16):23–26.Google Scholar
  • Hannan MT (2010) Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heugens PPMAR, Lander MW (2009) Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Acad. Management J. 52(1):61–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland JH (1995) Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):398–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G, Roberts PW, Swaminathan A (2012) Evaluative schemas and the mediating role of critics. Organ. Sci. 23(1):83–97.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jepperson RL (1991) Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 143–163.Google Scholar
  • Jonsson S (2009) Refraining from imitation: Professional resistance and limited diffusion in a financial market. Organ. Sci. 20(1):172–186.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak AK (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1091–1106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamont M, Molnár V (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:167–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee BH (2009) The infrastructure of collective action and policy content diffusion in the organic food industry. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1247–1269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee K, Pennings JM (2002) Mimicry and the market—Adoption of a new organizational form. Acad. Management J. 45(1):144–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leifer EM, White HC (1987) A structural approach to markets. Mizruchi MS, Schwartz M, eds. Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 85–108.Google Scholar
  • Lenox MJ (2006) The role of private decentralized institutions in sustaining industry self-regulation. Organ. Sci. 17(6):677–690.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2001) Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):29–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:143–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annual Rev. Psych. 32:89–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mezias SJ (1990) An institutional model of organizational practice: Financial reporting at the fortune 200. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):431–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Miner AS, Raghavan SV (1999) Interorganizational imitation: A hidden engine of selection. Baum JAC, McKelvey B, eds. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 35–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohr JW (1994) Soldiers, mothers, tramps and others: Discourse roles in the 1907 New York City charity directory. Poetics 22(4):327–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohr JW, White HC (2008) How to model an institution. Theory Soc. 37(5):485–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy GL (2004) The Big Book of Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian winemaking. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • North DC (1991) Institutions. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):97–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhmatovskiy I, David RJ (2012) Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organ. Sci. 23(1):155–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer DA, Jennings PD, Zhou X (1993) Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):100–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter TM (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Powell WW, Colyvas JA (2008) Microfoundations of institutional theory. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 276–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Giorgi S (2006) Code breaking: How entrepreneurs exploit cultural logics to generate institutional change. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 269–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Sivakumar K (1999) Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organ. Sci. 10(1):27–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):969–991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robbin A (1999) The problematic status of U.S. statistics on race and ethnicity: An “imperfect representation of reality.” J. Government Inform. 26(5):467–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rosch E, Mervis CB (1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psych. 7(4):573–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L, Abrahamson E (1999) Modeling reputational and informational influences in threshold models of bandwagon innovation diffusion. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 5(4):361–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossman G (2009) The diffusion of the legitimate and the diffusion of legitimacy. Working Paper CCPR-2009-033, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (2011) Reinforcing the micro/macro bridge: Organizational thinking and pluralistic vehicles. J. Management 37(2):429–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudolph JW, Repenning NP (2002) Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1957) Bargaining, communication, and limited war. Conflict Resolution 1(1):19–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1:143–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schneiberg M (2005) Combining new institutionalisms: Explaining institutional change in American property insurance. Sociol. Forum 20(1):93–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneiberg M (2007) What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Econom. Rev. 5(1):47–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):434–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck WH (2006) The Production of Knowledge: The Challenge of Social Science Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starr P (1992) Social categories and claims in the liberal state. Douglas M, Hull D, eds. How Classification Works: Nelson Goodman Among the Social Sciences (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK), 154–179.Google Scholar
  • Sterman JD (2001) System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. Calif. Management Rev. 43(4):8–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:265–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Tuma NB (1993) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(3):614–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Struben J, Sterman JD (2008) Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Design 35:1070–1097.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suddaby R (2010) Challenges for institutional theory. J. Management Inquiry 19(1):14–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terlaak A, Gong Y (2008) Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):846–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert PS, Zucker LG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1):22–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waguespack DM, Sorenson O (2011) The ratings game: Asymmetry in classification. Organ. Sci. 22(3):541–553.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss A (1995) Human capital vs. signalling explanations of wages. J. Econom. Perspect. 9(4):133–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wejnert B (2002) Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:297–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:367–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):127–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Gulati R, Shortell SM (1997) Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):366–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White HC (1981) Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3):517–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42(5):726–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 53–111.Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, Rittmann JV (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.