Under Construction: How Commensuration and Management Fashion Affect Corporate Reputation Rankings

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0852

References

  • Abrahamson E (1996) Management fashion. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):254–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adhikari A, Duru A (2006) Voluntary disclosure of free cash flow information. Accounting Horizons 20(4):311–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Jayaraman N (1994) The dividend policies of all-equity firms: A direct test of the free cash flow theory. Managerial Decision Econom. 15(2):139–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartov E (1993) The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation. Accounting Rev. 68(4):840–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2010) ivreg2: Stata module for extended instrumental variables/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class regression. Statistical Software Components S425401, Boston College Department of Economics, Boston College, Boston. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s425401.html.Google Scholar
  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Anchor Books, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
  • Bhattacharya N, Black E, Christensen T, Larson C (2003) Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 36(1–3):285–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boldin M, Ding B (2004) User’s guide to Thomson Financial Mutual Fund and investment company common stock holdings databases on WRDS. Report, Wharton Research Data Services, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Boyd BK, Gove S, Hitt MA (2005) Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of AMIHUD and LEV. Strategic Management J. 26(4):367–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradshaw MT, Sloan RG (2002) GAAP versus the street: An empirical assessment of two alternative definitions of earnings. J. Accounting Res. 40(1):41–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brealey RA, Myers SC (1988) Principles of Corporate Finance, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Brown B, Perry S (1994) Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “most admired” companies. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1347–1359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown LD, Sivakumar K (2003) Comparing the value relevance of two operating income measures. Rev. Accounting Stud. 8(4):561–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgstahler D, Dichev I (1997) Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. J. Accounting Econom. 24(1):99–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bushee BJ (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. 73(3):305–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carberry EJ, King BG (2012) Defensive practice adoption in the face of organizational stigma: Impression management and the diffusion of stock option expensing. J. Management Stud. 49(7):1137–1167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll CE, McCombs M (2003) Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Rev. 6(1):36–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carruthers BG, Espeland WN (1991) Accounting for rationality: Double-entry bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(1):31–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carruthers BG, Stinchcombe AL (1999) The social structure of liquidity: Flexibility, markets, and states. Theory Soc. 28(3):353–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW (2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):125–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chauvin KW, Guthrie JP (1994) Labor market reputation and the value of the firm. Managerial Decision Econom. 15(6):543–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christy GC (2009) Free Cash Flow: Seeing Through the Accounting Fog Machine to Find Great Stocks (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creyer EH (1997) The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? J. Consumer Marketing 14(6):421–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danielson MG, Press E (2003) Accounting returns revisited: Evidence of their usefulness in estimating economic returns. Rev. Accounting Stud. 8(4):493–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):583–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemp. Accounting Res. 13(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deckop JR, Merriman KK, Gupta S (2006) The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. J. Management 32(3):329–342.Google Scholar
  • Degeorge F, Patel J, Zeckhauser R (1999) Earnings manipulation to exceed thresholds. J. Bus. 72(1):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dichev ID, Graham JR, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S (2013) Earnings quality: Evidence from the field. J. Accounting Econom. 56(2–3, Supplement 1):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2007) Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 24(3):224–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland WN (2002) Commensuration and cognition. Cerulo KA, ed. Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition (Routledge, New York), 63–88.Google Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24(1):313–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, March JG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(2):171–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher FM (1988) Accounting data and the economic performance of firms. J. Accounting Public Policy 7(4):253–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC, Hirsch PM (2005) The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(1):29–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flanagan DJ, O’Shaughnessy K, Palmer T (2011) Reassessing the relationship between the Fortune reputation data and financial performance: Overwhelming influence or just a part of the puzzle? Corporate Reputation Rev. 14(1):3–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun C (2007) List of lists: A compilation of international corporate reputation ratings. Corporate Reputation Rev. 10(2):144–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. 33(2):233–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederickson JR, Miller JS (2004) The effects of pro forma earnings disclosures on analysts’ and nonprofessional investors’ equity valuation judgments. Accounting Rev. 79(3):667–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fryxell GE, Jia W (1994) The Fortune corporate “reputation” index: Reputation for what? J. Management 20(1):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gladwell M (2011) The order of things. New Yorker 87(1):68–75.Google Scholar
  • Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 30(4):425–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graffin SD, Ward AJ (2010) Certifications and reputation: Determining the standard of desirability amidst uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 21(2):331–346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graham JR, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S (2005) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 40(1–3):3–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall R (1992) The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management J. 13(2):135–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton JD (1994) Time Series Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heij C (2004) Econometric Methods with Applications in Business and Economics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Hendershott R (2004) Net value: Wealth creation (and destruction) during the Internet boom. J. Corporate Finance 10(2):281–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hutton C (1986) America’s most admired corporations. Fortune (January 6) 16–22.Google Scholar
  • Jacquemin AP, Berry CH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J. Indust. Econom. 27(4):359–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(2):323–329.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy M (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King BG (2011) The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Soc. Problems 58(4):491–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kochhar R, David P (1996) Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management J. 17(1):73–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee GK, Paruchuri S (2008) Entry into emergent and uncertain product markets: The role of associative rhetoric. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1171–1188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemann N (1999) The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy, 1st ed. (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Levin P, Espeland WN (2001) Pollution futures: Commensuration, commodification and the market for air. Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ, eds. Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 119–150.Google Scholar
  • Lougee BA, Marquardt CA (2004) Earnings informativeness and strategic disclosure: An empirical examination of “pro forma” earnings. Accounting Rev. 79(3):769–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowenstein R (2004) Origins of the Crash: The Great Bubble and Its Undoing (Penguin Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Macey JR (1997) Institutional investors and corporate monitoring: A demand-side perspective. Managerial Decision Econom. 18(7/8):601–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA (2008) Do well by doing good? Don’t count on it. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(1):19–20.Google Scholar
  • Marquis C, Glynn M, Davis G (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin JD, Petty JW (2000) Value Based Management: The Corporate Response to the Shareholder Revolution (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • McDonough PM, Lising A, Walpole AM, Perez LX (1998) College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Res. Higher Ed. 39(5):513–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer MW (2005) Can performance studies create actionable knowledge if we can’t measure the performance of the firm? J. Management Inquirty 14(3):287–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore R (2002) Can’t beat cold cash. Motley Fool (August 29) http://www.fool.com/dripport/2002/dripport020829.htm.Google Scholar
  • Mouawad J (2010) Fast-growing BP also has a mounting list of spills and safety lapses. New York Times (May 9) A22.Google Scholar
  • Murphy KJ (1985) Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):11–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nofsinger JR, Sias RW (1999) Herding and feedback trading by institutional and individual investors. J. Finance 54(6):2263–2295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliva R, Sterman J, Giese M (2003) Limits to growth in the new economy: Exploring the “get big fast” strategy in e-commerce. System Dynam. Rev. 19(2):83–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patsuris P (2002) The corporate scandal sheet. Forbes (August 26) http://www.forbes.com/2002/07/25/accountingtracker.html.Google Scholar
  • Pennebaker JW, Francis ME (1996) Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition Emotion 10(6):601–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME (2007) LIWC2007: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, 1.12 ed. [Software.] LIWC Inc., Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  • Perry NJ (1984) America’s most admired companies. Fortune 109(13):50.Google Scholar
  • Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock TG, Rindova VP, Maggitti PG (2008) Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the USIPO market. Acad. Management J. 51(2):335–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival. Strategic Management J. 15(8):29–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riahi-Belkaoui A, Pavlik E (1991) Asset management performance and reputation building for large US firms. British J. Management 2(4):231–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riahi-Belkaoui A, Pavlik EL (1992) Accounting for Corporate Reputation (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
  • Rindova V, Williamson I, Petkova A, Sever J (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1033–1049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1077–1093.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogerson W P (1997) Intertemporal cost allocation and managerial investment incentives: A theory explaining the use of economic value added as a performance measure. J. Political Econom. 105(4):770–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M, Scott WR (1998) A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):877–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rutherford BA (2003) The social construction of financial statement elements under private finance initiative schemes. Accounting, Auditing Accountability J. 16(3):372–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sauder M, Espeland W (2006) Strength in numbers? The advantages of multiple rankings. Indiana Law J. 81(205):205–227.Google Scholar
  • Sauder M, Lancaster R (2006) Do rankings matter? The effects of US News and World Report rankings on the admissions process of law schools. Law Soc. Rev. 40(1):105–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schnietz KE, Epstein MJ (2005) Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Rev. 7(4):327–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz E (1988) America’s most admired companies. Fortune 117(2):32–37.Google Scholar
  • Skinner D, Sloan R (2002) Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Rev. Accounting Stud. 7(2–3):289–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stake JE (2006) The interplay between law school rankings, reputations, and resource allocation: Ways rankings mislead. Indiana Law J. 81:229–270.Google Scholar
  • Staw BM, Epstein LD (2000) What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):523–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stern JM, Stewart GB, Chew DH (1995) The EVA financial management system. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 8(2):32–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2003) Introduction to Econometrics (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tadelis S (1999) What’s in a name? Reputation as a tradeable asset. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(3):548–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1125–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M (1986) The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Vijayaraghavan G (1980) The objectives of financial statements: An empirical study of the use of cash flow and earnings by security analysts. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 5(4):383–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogel D (2005) The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Waddock S (2003) Myths and realities of social investing. Organ. Environment 16(3):369–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):281–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber RP (1990) Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weigelt K, Camerer C (1988) Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management J. 9(5):443–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weil J (2001) SEC threatens to sue companies for misleading “pro forma” results. Wall Street Journal (December 5) A2.Google Scholar
  • Wenner DL, LeBer RW (1989) Managing for shareholder value—From top to bottom. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(6):52–65.Google Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):127–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Xiaomeng Z, Bartol KM, Smith KG, Pfarrer MD, Khanin DM (2008) CEOs on the edge: Earnings manipulation and the stock-based incentive misalignment. Acad. Management J. 51(2):241–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yalch RF, Elmore-Yalch R (1984) The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 11(1):522–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1995) Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation: Substance and symbolism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):283–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (2004) The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):433–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki MJ (1998) The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):602–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.