Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance

References

• Abetti PA (1997) Underground innovation in Japan: The development of Toshiba’s word processor and laptop computer. Creativity Innovation Management 6(3):127–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (2000) Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. Locke E, ed. Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 331–341.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz SS (1987) Creativity in the R&D Laboratory (Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC).Google Scholar
• Antoncic B, Hisrich RD (2001) Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. J. Bus. Venturing 16(5): 495–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aram JD (1973) Innovation via the R&D underground. Res. Management 16(November):24–26.Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvey RD, Murphy KR (1998) Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual Rev. Psych. 49(1):141–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augsdörfer P (1996) Forbidden Fruit: An Analysis of Bootlegging, Uncertainty, and Learning in Corporate R&D (Avebury, Aldershot, UK).Google Scholar
• Augsdörfer P (2005) Bootlegging and path dependency. Res. Policy 34(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (1985) Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management 24(2):129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N, Katz JN, Tucker R (1998) Taking time seriously: Time-series–cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. Amer. J. Political Sci. 42(4):1260–1288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker HS (1997) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2): 223–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA, Grove AS (2007) Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management J. 28(10):965–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA, Sayles LR (1986) Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure, and Managerial Skills (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Cheng Y-T, Van de Ven AH (1996) Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos? Organ. Sci. 7(6):593–614.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG (1990) Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Bus. Horizons 33(3):44–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Edgett SJ (2009) Generating Breakthrough New Product Ideas: Feeding the Innovation Funnel (Product Development Institute, Ancaster, ON, Canada).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahlin K, Taylor M, Fichman M (2004) Today’s Edisons or weekend hobbyists: Technical merit and success of inventions by independent inventors. Res. Policy 33(8):1167–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiTomaso N, Post C, Smith DR, Farris GF, Cordero R (2007) Effects of structural position on allocation and evaluation decisions for scientists and engineers in industrial R&D. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):175–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman DC (1984) The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. 9(1):47–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford JD, Ford LW, D’Amelio A (2008) Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):362–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, Zempel J (1996) Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Acad. Management J. 39(1):37–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Gehman J, Kumaraswamy A (2011) Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organ. Stud. 32(6):737–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3): 424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene CN (1978) Identification modes of professionals: Relationship with formalization, role strain, and alienation. Acad. Management J. 21(3):486–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH, Parasuraman S, Wormley WM (1990) Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Acad. Management J. 33(1):64–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1022–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A, Hauser JR (1996) Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. J. Product Innovation Management 13(3):191–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gundling E, Porras JI (2000) The 3M Way to Innovation: Balancing People and Profit (Kodansha International, New York).Google Scholar
• Hannah DR (2005) Should I keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees’ obligations to protect trade secrets. Organ. Sci. 16(1):71–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer B, Davenport TH (2008) Reverse engineering Google’s innovation machine. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(4):58–68.Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (2000) When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Swedberg R, ed. Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 167–210.Google Scholar
• Knight KE (1967) A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. J. Bus. 40(4):478–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Koch R, Leitner KH (2008) The dynamics and functions of self-organization in the fuzzy front end: Empirical evidence from the Austrian semiconductor industry. Creativity Innovation Management 17(3):216–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Robinson SL (2007) Ain’t misbehavin: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. J. Management 33(3): 378–394.Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C (2010) Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):558–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masoudnia Y, Szwejczewski M (2012) Bootlegging in the R&D departments of high-technology firms. Res.-Tech. Management 55(5):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Miner AS (1994) Seeking adaptive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action. Baum JAC, Singh JV, eds. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 76–89.Google Scholar
• Mom TJM, van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2009) Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):812–828.Link, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC (2009) Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution.” Indust. Corporate Change 18(1):1–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1977) In search of useful theory of innovation. Res. Policy 6(1):36–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nye JS Jr (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (PublicAffairs, New York).Google Scholar
• O’Connor GC, DeMartino R (2006) Organizing for radical innovation: An exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms. J. Product Innovation Management 23(6):475–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connor GC, McDermott CM (2004) The human side of radical innovation. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 21(1–2):11–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. 39(3):607–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelz DC, Andrews FM (1966) Autonomy, coordination, and stimulation in relation to scientific achievement. Behav. Sci. 11(2): 89–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5): 879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid SE, De Brentani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. J. Product Innovation Management 21(3):170–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rynes SL, Gerhart B, Minette KA (2004) The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management 43(4): 381–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salter A, Criscuolo P, Ter Wal ALJ, Alexy O (2012) Open for ideation: Individual-level openness and idea generation in R&D. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, June 19–21, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Sarin S, Mahajan V (2001) The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. J. Marketing 65(2):35–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2010) Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 37(3):580–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma A (1999) Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. Calif. Management Rev. 41(3):146–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM (2003) The constraining effects of initiation ideas. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York), 15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Wal ALJ, Criscuolo P, Salter A (2011) The craft of openness: Absorptive capacity at the individual level and innovation. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, June 15–17, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB (2006) An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psych. 52(3):591–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA III (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38(4):8–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB (2011) When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ. Sci. 22(3):621–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Unsworth K (2001) Unpacking creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):289–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sci. 32(5):590–607.Link, Google Scholar
• Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss ZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 51(1):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren DE (2003) Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):622–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West MA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Whelan-Berry KS, Gordon JR, Hinings CR (2003) Strengthening organizational change processes: Recommendations and implications from a multilevel analysis. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 39(2): 186–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. (South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar