Competitive Behavior and Nonfinancial Objectives: Entry, Exit, and Pricing Decisions in Closely Held Firms

References

• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amihud Y, Lev B (1999) Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification? Strategic Management J. 20(11):1063–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R, MacCrimmon KR, Zietsma C (2001) Does money matter? Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 16(2):119–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronson RL (1991) Self-Employment: A Labor Market Perspective (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Barnett WP (1993) Strategic deterrence among multipoint competitors. Indust. Corporate Change 2(1):249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB, Arikan AM (2001) The resource-based view: Origins and implications. Hitt MA, Freeman RE, Harrison JS, eds. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 124–188.Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Ingram P (1998) Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. 44(7):996–1016.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Korn HJ (1996) Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Acad. Management J. 39(2):255–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Mezias SJ (1992) Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):580–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger BD, Kosnik RD, Turk TA (1991) Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Acad. Management J. 34(1):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty RB, Zajac EJ (1994) Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):313–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benz M, Frey BS (2008) Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. Economica 75(298):362–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA, Means GC (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR, Larraza-Kintana M (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):82–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W, Goodstein J, Stephan J, Murmann JP (1997) Competition in a multimarket environment: The case of market exit. Organ. Sci. 8(2):126–142.Link, Google Scholar
• Byrd J, Parrino R, Pritsch G (1998) Stockholder-manager conflicts and firm value. Financial Analysts J. 54(3):14–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar G (2007) Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 19(1):89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):100–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Su KH, Tsai W (2007) Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Acad. Management J. 50(1):101–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung W, Kalnins A (2001) Agglomeration effects and performance: A test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management J. 22(10):969–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlin M, Kadiyali V (2006) Entry-deterring capacity in the Texas lodging industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15(1): 167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coughenour JF, Deli DN (2002) Liquidity provision and the organizational form of NYSE specialist firms. J. Finance 57(2):841–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronqvist H, Heyman F, Nilsson M, Svaleryd H, Vlachos J (2009) Do entrenched managers pay their workers more? J. Finance 64(1):309–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2009) The embedded entrepreneur. Eur. Management Rev. 6(3):172–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily CM, Dalton DR, Rajagopalan N (2003) Governance through ownership: Centuries of practice, decades of research. Acad. Management J. 46(2):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton DR, Hitt MA, Certo ST, Dalton CM (2007) The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):1–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1983) The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. J. Law Econom. 26(2):375–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H, Lehn K (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. J. Political Econom. 93(6): 1155–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis DJ, Denis DK, Sarin A (1999) Agency theory and the influence of equity ownership structure on corporate diversification strategies. Strategic Management J. 20(11):1071–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2003) Pricing process as a capability: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Management J. 24(7):615–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer WG, Whetten DA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(6):785–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 13(S2):17–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans WN, Kessides IN (1994) Living by the “golden rule”: Multimarket contact in the U.S. airline industry. Quart. J. Econom. 109(2):341–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatewood EJ, Shaver KG, Gartner WB (1995) A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation. J. Bus. Venturing 10(5):371–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 13(4):421–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1992) Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. 100(3):468–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J (1999) Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: Staking out “spheres of influence” in the U.S. airline industry. Strategic Management J. 20(2):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):750–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Nunez-Nickel M, Gutierrez I (2001) The role of family ties in agency contracts. Acad. Management J. 44(1):81–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes KT, Núñez-Nickel M, Jacobson KJL, Moyano-Fuentes J (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):106–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (2002) Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 4th ed. (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Hamilton B (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns of self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward MLA, Hambrick DC (1997) Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Head K, Ries J, Swenson D (1995) Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United-States. J. Internat. Econom. 38(3–4):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillier D, McGolgan P (2008) An analysis of majority owner-managed companies in the UK. Accounting Finance 48(4):603–623.Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Grossman W (2002) Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Acad. Management J. 45(4):697–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hundley G (2001) Why and when are the self-employed more satisfied with their work? Indust. Relations 40(2):293–316.Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter T, Kleindienst I (2006) Strategy-process research: What have we learned and what is still to be explored. J. Management 32(5):673–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2010) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 22(1):32–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Chung W (2004) Resource-seeking agglomeration: A study of market entry in the lodging industry. Strategic Management J. 25(7):689–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Lafontaine F (2004) Multi-unit ownership in franchising: Evidence from the fast-food industry in Texas. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):747–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Kochhar R, David P (1996) Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management J. 17(1):73–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuratko DF, Hornsby JS, Naffziger DW (1997) An examination of owner’s goals in sustaining entrepreneurship. J. Small Bus. Management 37(1):24–33.Google Scholar
• Landier A, Nair VB, Wulf J (2009) Trade-offs in staying close: Corporate decision making and geographic dispersion. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(3):1119–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Cannella AA, Lubatkin MH (1999) Ownership structure and corporate strategy: One question viewed from two different worlds. Strategic Management J. 20(11):1077–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimal labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen TL, Walker G (2007) Incumbent and entrant rivalry in a deregulated industry. Organ. Sci. 18(4):667–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Mallory GR, Butler RJ, Cray D, Hickson DJ, Wilson DC (1983) Implanted decision-making: American owned firms in Britain. J. Management Stud. 20(2):191–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCann BT, Vroom G (2010) Pricing response to entry and agglomeration effects. Strategic Management J. 31(3):284–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDougall P, Robinson RB Jr (1990) New venture strategies: An empirical identification of eight “archetypes” of competitive strategies for entry. Strategic Management J. 11(6):447–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester RH (2011) Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. J. Management Stud. 48(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moskowitz TJ, Vissing-Jorgensen A (2002) The returns to entrepreneurial investment: A private equity premium puzzle? Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):745–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papadakis VM, Lioukas S, Chambers D (1998) Strategic decision-making processes: The role of management and context. Strategic Management J. 19(2):115–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sanders WG, Hambrick DC (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1055–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN, Buchholtz AK (2001) Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(2):99–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Scott Morton FM, Podolny JM (2002) Love or money? The effects of owner motivation in the California wine industry. J. Indust. Econom. 50(4):431–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengul M, Gimeno J, Dial J (2012) Strategic delegation: A review, theoretical integration, and research agenda. J. Management 38(1):375–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. 21(12):1175–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Ferrier WJ, Ndofor H (2001) Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. Hitt MA, Freeman ER, Harrison JS, eds. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 315–361.Google Scholar
• Vickers J (1985) Delegation and the theory of the firm. Econom. J. 95:138–147.Google Scholar
• Vroom G, Gimeno J (2007) Ownership form, managerial incentives, and the intensity of rivalry. Acad. Management J. 50(4):901–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2008) The founder’s dilemma. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(2):102–109.Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bowen HP (2009) The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management J. 30(6):679–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiklund J, Davidsson P, Delmar F (2003) What do they think and feel about growth? An expectancy-value approach to small business managers’ attitudes toward growth. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 27(3):247–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WorldatWork (2008) 2008–09 salary budget survey. Report, WorldatWork, Washington, DC. http://www.worldatwork.org/bookstore/html/product.jsp?id=9781579631895.Google Scholar
• Wright P, Ferrris SP, Sarin A, Awasthi V (1996) Impact of corporate insider, blockholder and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Acad. Management J. 39(2):441–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright P, Kroll M, Lado A, van Ness B (2002) The structure of ownership and corporate acquisition strategies. Strategic Management J. 23(1):41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin X, Zajac EJ (2004) The strategy/governance structure fit relationship: Theory and evidence in franchising arrangements. Strategic Management J. 25(4):365–383.Crossref, Google Scholar