Turnover at the Top: Executive Team Departures and Firm Performance

References

• Abelson MA, Baysinger BD (1984) Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. Acad. Management Rev. 9:331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Arthur JB (1994) Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Acad. Management J. 37:670–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batt R, Colvin A (2011) An employment systems approach to turnover, human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. Acad. Management J. 54:696–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G (1964) Human Capital (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bergh DD (2001) Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure. J. Management 27:603–622.Google Scholar
• Bloom M, Michel JG (2002) The relationships among organizational context pay dispersion and managerial turnover. Acad. Management J. 45:33–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1997) Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Management J. 40:152–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:339–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannella AA, Park JH, Lee H (2008) Top management team diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of external and internal context. Acad. Management J. 51:768–784.Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Maruping LM, Takeuchi R (2006) Disentangling the effects of CEO turnover and succession on organizational capabilities: A social network perspective. Organ. Sci. 17:563–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA (2002) The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 23:275–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management teams global strategic posture and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 44:533–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Sanders WMG (2002) Top management team compensation: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management J. 23:367–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents elements and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30:749–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castanias RP, Helfat CE (1991) Managerial resources and rents. J. Management 17:155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23:239–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19: 461–477.Google Scholar
• Collins CJ, Clark KD (2003) Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management J. 46:740–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crampton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12:346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Crook TR, Todd SY, Combs JG, Woehr DJ, Ketchen DJ (2011) Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. J. Appl. Psych. 96:443–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton DR, Todor WD (1979) Turnover turned over: An expanded and positive perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 4:225–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta DK, Guthrie JP, Wright PM (2005) HRM and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Acad. Management J. 48:135–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29:52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Shaw JD (2001) Voluntary turnover social capital and organizational performance. Acad. Management Rev. 26:446–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Boyd BK (1998) How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 41:179–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:484–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1996) Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (West, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Fischer HM, Pollock TG (2004) Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 47:463–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson JW, Davis-Blake A, Sanders WG (2010) Sharing the wealth: Social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management J. 31:1031–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17:109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover. J. Management 26:463–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK (1984) Contingency linkages between strategy and general manager characteristics: A conceptual examination. Acad. Management Rev. 9:399–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK (1988) Contingency perspectives on strategic leadership: Current knowledge and future research directions. Hambrick DC, ed. The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 147–178.Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Govindarajan V (1984) Business unit strategy managerial characteristics and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Acad. Management J. 27:25–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guthrie JP, Datta DK (2008) Dumb and dumber: The impact of downsizing on firm performance as moderated by industry conditions. Organ. Sci. 19:108–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Guthrie JP, Olian JD (1991) Does context affect staffing decisions? The case of general managers. Personnel Psych. 44:263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guthrie JP, Grimm CM, Smith KG (1991) Environmental change and management staffing: An empirical study. J. Management 17:735–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad. Management J. 36:844–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1994) Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 171–214.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Abrahamson E (1995) Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Acad. Management J. 38:1427–1441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, D’Aveni RA (1992) Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Sci. 38:1445–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S (1987) Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 369–406.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9:193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen M (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41:659–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Geletkanycz M, Frederickson J (1993) Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some results of its determinants. Strategic Management J. 14:401–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock JI, Allen DG, Bosco FA, McDaniel KR, Pierce CA (2013) Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. J. Management 39:573–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Holwerda JA (2013) When does employee turnover matter? Dynamic member configurations, productive capacity, and collective performance. Organ. Sci. 24:210–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Trevor CO (2011) Collective turnover at the group, unit and organizational levels: Evidence, issues and implications. J. Management 37:352–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35:519–530.Google Scholar
• Helmich DL, Brown WB (1972) Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17:371–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: A competitive test of economic and behavioral views. Acad. Management J. 44:96–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Miller D, Hambrick DC (2006) How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism CEO tenure and company performance. Strategic Management J. 27:447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 25:623–641.Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52:473–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Keats BW, Hitt MA (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. 31:570–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keck SL (1997) Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. 8:143–156.Link, Google Scholar
• Khandwalla PN (1973) Effect of competition on the structure of top management control. Acad. Management J. 16:285–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khoja F, Maranville S (2010) How do firms nurture absorptive capacity? J. Managerial Issues 22:262–278.Google Scholar
• Kor YY (2003) Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organ. Sci. 14:707–719.Link, Google Scholar
• Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2005) How dynamics management and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management J. 26:489–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krauss RM, Fussell SR (1990) Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. Galegher J, Kraut RE, Egido C, eds. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 111–146.Google Scholar
• Kreft I, De Leeuw J (1998) Introducing Multilevel Modeling (Sage Publications, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19:461–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leana CR, Van Buren HJ (1999) Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Management Rev. 24:538–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Main BGM, O’Reilly CA III, Wade J (1993) Top executive pay: Tournament or teamwork? J. Labor Econom. 11:606–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McElroy JC, Morrow PC, Rude SN (2001) Turnover and organizational performance: A comparative analysis of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 86:1294–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier KJ, Hicklin A (2008) Employee turnover and organizational performance: Testing a hypothesis from classical public administration. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 18:573–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel JG, Hambrick DC (1992) Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Management J. 35:9–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1991) Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. 37: 34–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Porter LT, Steers RM (1982) Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Nyberg AJ, Ployhart RE (2013) Context-emergent turnover (CET) theory: A theory of collective turnover. Acad. Management Rev. 38:109–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park TY, Shaw JD (2013) Turnover rates and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 98:268–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Davis-Blake A (1986) Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Acad. Management J. 29:72–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multi-level modeling, and latent curve analysis. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 31:437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price JL (1977) The Study of Turnover (Iowa State University Press, Ames).Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Schwenk C (1993) Management tenure and explanations for success and failure. OMEGA Internat. J. Management Sci. 21:449–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Gupta N, Delery JE (2005a) Alternative conceptualizations of the relationship between voluntary turnover and organizational performance. Acad. Management J. 48:50–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Park TY, Kim E (2013) A resource-based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 34:572–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Delery JE, Jenkins GD, Gupta N (1998) An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 41:511–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Duffy M, Johnson J, Lockhart D (2005b) Turnover social capital losses and performance. Acad. Management J. 48:594–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Cho TS (2005) Exploring involuntary executive turnover through a managerial discretion framework. Acad. Management Rev. 30:843–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer J (1998) Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 24:323–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snell SA, Youndt MA, Wright PM (1996) Establishing a framework for research in human resource management: Merging resource theory and organizational learning. Ferris G, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 14 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 61–90.Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (1976) Organizations and their environments. Dunette MD, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, Chicago), 1069–1123.Google Scholar
• Strober MH (1990) Human capital theory. Indust. Relations 29:214–239.Google Scholar
• Ton Z, Huckman RS (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19:56–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Virany B, Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1992) Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organizational learning approach. Organ. Sci. 3:72–91.Link, Google Scholar
• Wagner WG, Pfeffer J, O’Reilly CA (1984) Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29:74–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Ellwood JW (1991) Mergers, acquisitions, and the pruning of managerial deadwood: An examination of the market for corporate control. Strategic Management J. 12:201–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. 35:91–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1993) Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management J. 14:485–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CR (1999) Reward contingency, unemployment, and functional turnover. Human Resource Management Rev. 9:549–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1965) A dynamic theory of interfirm behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 79:579–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright PM, Dunford BB, Snell SA (2001) Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. J. Management 27:701–721.Crossref, Google Scholar