Paradigm-Changing vs. Paradigm-Deepening Innovation: How Firm Scope Influences Firm Technological Response to Shocks

References

• Ackerman RW (1970) Influence of integration and diversity on the investment process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 15(3):341–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alonso-Borrego C, Forcadell FJ (2010) Related diversification and R&D intensity dynamics. Res. Policy 39(4):537–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N (1996) Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management J. 17(5):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8/9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gamberdella A (2010) Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):775–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin WL, Scott JT (1987) Market Structure and Technological Change (Harwood Academic Publishers, London).Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, Vanreenen J (1995) Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econom. J. 105(429):333–344.Google Scholar
• Bower JL (1970) Managing the Resource Allocation Process (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen JF (1998) Management of technology in multiproduct firms. Coombs R, Green K, Richards A, Walsh V, eds. Technological Change and Organization (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 58–76.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levin RC (1989) Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1st ed., Vol. 2 (Elsevier, New York), 1059–1107.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature 26(3):1120–1171.Google Scholar
• Dundas KNM, Richardson PR (1982) Implementing the unrelated product strategy. Strategic Management J. 3(4):287–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilsing V, Nooteboom B (2006) Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Res. Policy 35(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Tratjenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40(12):1720–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Hicks JR (1932) The Theory of Wages (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hoskisson RE (1987) Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Acad. Management Rev. 12(2):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organ. Sci. 3(4):501–521.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA (1988) Strategic control-systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms. Strategic Management J. 9(6):605–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Hill CWL (1993) Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organ. Sci. 4(2):325–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D—Evidence from patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2000) Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1061–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kay NM (1988) The R&D function: Corporate strategy and structure. Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L, eds. Technical Change and Economic Theory (Pinter Publishers, London), 282–294.Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives within differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler U, Ernst H (2007) External technology commercialization in large firms: Results of a quantitative benchmarking study. R&D Management 37(5):383–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Shumway R (2009) Induced innovation and marginal cost of new technology. Econom. Lett. 105:106–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorsch JW, Allen SA (1973) Managing Diversity and Interdependence (Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. 67(3):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell RG, Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):941–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nightingale P (2008) Meta-paradigm change and the theory of the firm. Indust. Corporate Change 17(3):533–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Labys WC (1994) Divergences in manufacturing energy consumption between the north and the south. Energy Policy 22(6): 455–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitts RA (1977) Strategies and structures for diversification. Acad. Management J. 20(2):197–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(1):160–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popp D (2006) They don’t invent them like they used to: An examination of energy patent citations over time. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 15(8):753–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramanujam V, Varadarajan P (1989) Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic Management J. 10(6):523–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins JA, Wiersema MF (1995) A resource-based approach to the multi-business firms: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 16(4):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins JA, Wiersema MF (2003) The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: Analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes. Strategic Management J. 24(1):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1975) Problems in economists conceptualization of technological innovation. History Political Econom. 7(4): 456–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruttan VW (1997) Induced innovation, evolutionary theory and path dependence: Sources of technical change. Econom. J. 107(444): 1520–1529.Google Scholar
• Sahal D (1981) Alternative conceptions of technology. Res. Policy 10(1):2–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahal D (1985) Technological guideposts and innovative avenues. Res. Policy 14(2):61–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (1998) Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):267–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmookler J (1966) Invention and Economic Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation—Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2008) Dosi’s technological paradigms and trajectories: Insights for economics and management. Indust. Corporate Change 17(3):507–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tegarden LF, Hatfield DE, Echols AE (1999) Doomed from the start: What is the value of selecting a future dominant design? Strategic Management J. 20(6):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vancil RF (1979) Decentralization: Managerial Ambiguity by Design (Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS (1993) A diametric forces model of strategic change: Assessing the antecedents and consequences of restructuring in the higher education industry. Strategic Management J. 14(S1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar