Situated Coworker Familiarity: How Site Visits Transform Relationships Among Distributed Workers

References

• Alge BJ, Wiethoff C, Klein HJ (2003) Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision making teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(1):26–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B (2008) How extraverted is [email protected]? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses. J. Res. Personality 42(4):1116–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA, Rockmann KW (2010) Chutes versus ladders: A punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E, Reis HT (1998) Interpersonal attraction and close relationships. Fiske S, Gilbert D, Lindzey G, Aronson E, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. (Random House, New York), 193–218.Google Scholar
• Boland RJ Jr, Tenkasi RV (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4):350–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Borden VMH, Levinger G (1991) Interpersonal transformations in intimate relationships. Jones WH, Perlman D, eds. Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 2 (Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London), 35–56.Google Scholar
• Carley KM (1990) Group stability: A socio-cognitive approach. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, eds. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–44.Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Brueller D, Dutton JE (2009) Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Res. Behav. Sci. 26(1):81–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Chudoba KM, Wynn E, Lu M, Watson-Manheim MB (2005) How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact on a global organization. Inform. Systems J. 15(4):279–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark MS, Lemay EP (2010) Close relationships. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, New York), 898–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connaughton SL, Shuffler M (2007) Multinational and multicultural distributed teams: A review and future agenda. Small Group Res. 38(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–353.Link, Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Howison J, Masango C, Eseryel UY (2007) The role of face-to-face meetings in technology-supported self-organizing distributed teams. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 50(3):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. 11(3):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman PS, Leyden DP (1991) Familiarity and group productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 76(4):578–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinter RE, Herbsleb JD, Perry DE (1999) The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Proc. Internat. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. Supporting Group Work (ACM, New York), 306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA, Dickson MW (1996) Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Rev. Psych. 47:307–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Mohammed S, McGrath JE, Florey AT, Vanderstoep SW (2003) Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personality Psych. 56(3):633–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Carley KM, Krackhardt D, Wholey D (2000) Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81(2):226–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson R (1996) Dignity in the workplace under participative management: Alienation and freedom revisited. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(5):717–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):56–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Shah PP (1997) Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(4):775–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What do we know about proximity in work groups? A legacy of research on physical distance. Hinds P, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 57–80.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Stern RN (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51(2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt DM, Porter LW (1985) When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’ attitudes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):242–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lépine JP, Gastpar M, Mendlewicz J, Tylee A (1997) Depression in the community: The first pan-European study DEPRES (Depression Research in European Society). Internat. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 12(1):19–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Carman R, Lott R (2001) Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25(2):229–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM (2000) Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5):473–492.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyers PW, Wilemon D (1989) Learning in new technology development teams. J. Product Innovation Management 6(2):79–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Neeley T (2012) Reflected knowledge and trust in global collaboration. Management Sci. 58(12):2207–2224.Link, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi B (2005) Beyond bandwidth: Dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 14(2):91–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA (2001) Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem solving groups. Acad. Management J. 44(4):794–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Waller MJ (2002) Focusing on midpoint transitions: An analysis of boundary conditions. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1056–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson GG, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Human-Comput. Interaction 15(2):139–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Ragins B, Dutton J (2006) Positive relationship at work: An invitation and introduction. Dutton J, Ragins B, eds. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–25.Google Scholar
• Sias PM (2009) Organizing Relationships: Traditional and Emerging Perspectives on Workplace Relationships (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sias PM, Cahill DJ (1998) From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western J. Comm. 62(3):273–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sluss DM, Ashforth BE (2007) Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sole D, Edmondson A (2002) Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British J. Management 13(S2):S17–S34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
• Sproull L, Kiesler S (1991) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Stohl C (1995) Organizational Communication: Connectedness in Action (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Vogus TJ (2006) What is it about relationships? A behavioral theory of social capital and performance. Eaton A, ed. Proc. 58th Annual Meeting Labor Employment Relations Assoc. (Labor and Employment Relations Association, Champaign, IL), 164–173.Google Scholar
• Wagstrom P, Herbsleb J, Kraut R, Mockus A (2010) The impact of commercial organizations on participation in an online community. Presentation at the Annual Academy of of Management Meeting, August 10, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY.Google Scholar
• Walther JB (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Comm. Res. 19(1):52–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Comm. Res. 23(1):1–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson JM, Straus SG, McEvily WJ (2006) All in due time: The development of trust in electronic and face-to-face groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(1):16–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 9(2, Part 2):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar