Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0872

References

  • Adler PS, Kwon S-W, Heckscher C (2008) Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organ. Sci. 19(2):359–376.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alexander RD (1987) The Biology of Moral Systems (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
  • Anthony D, Smith SW, Williamson T (2009) Explaining quality in Internet collective goods: Zealots and Good Samaritans in the case of Wikipedia. Ration Soc. 21(3):283–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM (2006) Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Sci. 52(7):1099–1115.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker WE, Levine SS (2013) Mechanisms of generalized exchange: Towards an integrated model. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1352101.Google Scholar
  • Baldwin CY (2008) Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Indust. Corporate Change 17(1):155–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Hienerth C, von Hippel E (2006) How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Res. Policy 35(9):1291–1313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bambauer DE, Day O (2011) The Hacker’s aegis. Emory Law J. 60(5):1051–1107.Google Scholar
  • Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. Yale Law J. 112(3):369–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benkler Y (2004) Commons-based strategies and the problems of patents. Science 305(5687):1110–1111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Benkler Y (2011) The Penguin and the Leviathan: The Triumph of Cooperation Over Self-Interest (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Benkler Y, Nissenbaum H (2006) Commons-based peer production and virtue. J. Politics Philos. 14(4):394–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A (2005) Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. J. Public Econom. 89(8):1457–1468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonaccorsi A, Rossi C (2003) Why open source software can succeed. Res. Policy 32(7):1243–1258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonaccorsi A, Giannangeli S, Rossi C (2006) Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1085–1098.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burton RM, Obel B (2011) Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—And triangulation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1195–1202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R, Ghemawat P (2006) Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. 52(7):1072–1084.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, Fabrizio K (2012) How do product users influence corporate invention? Organ. Sci. 23(4):971–987.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhuri A (2010) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experiment. Econom. 14(1):47–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhuri A, Paichayontvijit T (2006) Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to a public good. Econom. Bull. 3(8):1–14.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Market Res. 43(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cinyabuguma M, Page T, Putterman L (2005) Cooperation under the threat of expulsion in a public goods experiment. J. Public Econom. 89(8):1421–1435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooley CH (1909) Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cornes R, Sandler T (1984) Easy riders, joint production, and public goods. Econom. J. 94(375):580–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornes R, Sandler T (1986) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Cyert R, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dahlander L, O’Mahony S (2011) Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organ. Sci. 22(4):961–979.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlander L, Wallin MW (2006) A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy 35(8):1243–1259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David PA (1998) Common agency contracting and the emergence of “open science” institutions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):15–21.Google Scholar
  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM, Thaler RH (1988) Anomalies: Cooperation. J. Econom. Perspect. 2(3):187–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM, McTavish J, Shaklee H (1977) Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(1):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ (1995) Comments on “What theory is not.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):391–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreber A, Rand DG, Fudenberg D, Nowak MA (2008) Winners don’t punish. Nature 452(7185):348–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. 52(7):1057–1071.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edgeworth FY (1881) Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (A.M. Kelley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ekeh PP (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • European Commission (2006) Study on the: Economic impact of open source software on innovation and the competitiveness of the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector in the EU. Report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Johnson SL (2010) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2003) The nature of human altruism. Nature 425(6960):785–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. (2005) Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):541–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econom. Lett. 71(3):397–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2010) Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(12):5334–5338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32(1):157–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, von Hippel E (2003) Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy 32(7):1199–1215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Reisinger H, Hoppe D (2009) Remaining within-cluster heterogeneity: A meta-analysis of the “dark side” of clustering methods. J. Marketing Management 25(3–4):273–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S, Thöni C (2005) Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(2–3):303–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S, Renner E, Sefton M (2008) The long-run benefits of punishment. Science 322(5907):1510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh RA (1998) Cooking pot markets: An economic model for trade in free goods and services on the Internet. First Monday 3(3) http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/580/501.Google Scholar
  • Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glass RL (2000) The sociology of open source: Of cults and cultures. IEEE Software 17(3):104–105.Google Scholar
  • Goodman JD (2010) Learning to share, thanks to the Web. New York Times (September 27) WK2.Google Scholar
  • Greenstein S, Zhu F (2012) Is Wikipedia biased? Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):343–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Häfliger S, von Krogh G, Späth S (2008) Code reuse in open source software. Management Sci. 54(1):180–193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harhoff D, Henkel J, von Hippel E (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy 32(10):1753–1769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JR, Zhiang L, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1229–1245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckscher CC, Adler PS (2006) The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helft M (2007) With tools on Web, amateurs reshape mapmaking. New York Times (July 27) http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/27/technology/27maps.html.Google Scholar
  • Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy 35(7):953–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henkel J, Maurer SM (2007) The economics of synthetic biology. Molecular Systems Biol. 3:117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henkel J, Maurer SM (2009) Parts, property and sharing. Nature Biotechnol. 27(12):1095–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hess C, Ostrom E (2006) Introduction. Hess C, Ostrom E, eds. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–26.Google Scholar
  • Hollingshead AB (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1080–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(46):16385–16389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishii K, Kurzban R (2008) Public goods games in Japan: Cultural and individual differences in reciprocity. Human Nature 19(2):138–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2008) Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organ. Sci. 19(2):260–276.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kemp MC (1987) Gains from trade. Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P, eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 453–454.Google Scholar
  • Kollock P (1999) The economics of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. Smith MA, Kollock P, eds. Communities in Cyberspace (Routledge, New York), 220–239.Google Scholar
  • Kuk G (2006) Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Management Sci. 52(7):1031–1042.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar V, Gordon BR, Srinivasan K (2011) Competitive strategy for open source software. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1066–1078.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kurzban RO, Houser D (2005) An experimental investigation of cooperative types in human groups: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(5):1803–1807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: Free user to user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancashire D (2001) Code, culture and cash: The fading altruism of open source development. First Monday 6(12) http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_12/lancashire/index.html.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lauterbach D, Truong H, Shah T, Adamic L (2009) Surfing a web of trust: Reputation and reciprocity on CouchSurfing.com. Comput. Sci. Engrg. (CSE ’09), Vol. 4 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 346–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leach J (2004) A Course in Public Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lenth RV (2001) Some practical guidelines for effective sample-size determination. Amer. Statist. 55(3):187–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J, Tirole J (2005) Economic perspectives on open source. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 47–78.Google Scholar
  • Lessig L (2005) Open code and open societies. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 349–360.Google Scholar
  • Levati M, Morone A, Fiore A (2009) Voluntary contributions with imperfect information: An experimental study. Public Choice 138(1):199–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine SS (2001) Kindness in cyberspace? The sharing of valuable goods on-line. Gattiker UE, ed. Best Paper Proc., EICAR Internat. Conf. (IECAR, Aalborg, Denmark), 86–112.Google Scholar
  • Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2012) How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1748–1766.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K, Lange D, Gillis L (2005) Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. 16(6):581–598.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin T (2012) Cracking open the scientific process. New York Times (January 17) D1.Google Scholar
  • MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macy MW, Skvoretz J (1998) The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(5):638–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:143–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madey G, Freeh V, Tynan R (2004) Modeling the free/open source software community: A quantitative investigation. Koch S, ed. Free/Open Source Software Development (Idea Group, Hershey, PA), 2043–2057.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madison MJ, Frischmann BM, Strandburg KJ (2010) Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell Law Rev. 95:657–709.Google Scholar
  • Marengo L, Pasquali C (2010) Non rivalry and complementarity in computer software. Working paper, University Library of Munich, Munich. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25589.Google Scholar
  • Maurer SM, Scotchmer S (2006) Open source software: The new intellectual property paradigm. Hendershott T, ed. Economics and Information Systems (Elsevier, New York), 285–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1967) On Theoretical Sociology (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JD (2005) Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 163–209.Google Scholar
  • Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR (2007) Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):205–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson MR, Rademacher MA, Paek H-J (2007) Downshifting consumer = upshifting citizen? An examination of a local Free-cycle community. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 611(1):141–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nowak M, Highfield R (2011) Super Cooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nowak MA, Roch S (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B 274(1610):605–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393(6685):573–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ortí L, Carbajo RJ, Pieper U, Eswar N, Maurer SM, Rai AK, Taylor Get al. (2009) A kernel for open source drug discovery in tropical diseases. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3(4):e418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Page T, Putterman L, Unel B (2005) Voluntary association in public goods experiments: Reciprocity, mimicry and efficiency. Econom. J. 115(506):1032–1053.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Partha D, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlroth N (2011) Non-profit couchsurfing raises millions in funding. Forbes (August 24) http://www.forbes.com/sites/nicoleperlroth/2011/08/24/non-profit-couchsurfing-raises-millions-in-funding/.Google Scholar
  • Platt J (1973) Social trap. Amer. Psych. 28:641–651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Popper KR (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
  • Porter CE, Donthu N (2008) Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities. Management Sci. 54(1):113–128.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prietula MJ (2011) Thoughts on complexity and computational models. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 93–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prietula MJ, Carley KM, Gasser LG (1998) Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups (AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Rai AK (2005) “Open and collaborative” research: A new model for biomedicine. Hahn RW, ed. Intellectual Property Rights in Frontier Industries: Software and Biotechnology (AEI Press, Washington, DC), 131–158.Google Scholar
  • Raub W (1988) Problematic social situations and the “large-number dilemma” a game? Theoretical analysis. J. Math. Sociol. 13(4):311–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raymond ES (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins RW, Beer JS (2001) Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(2):340–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rustagi D, Engel S, Kosfeld M (2010) Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330(6006):961–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santos FC, Santos MD, Pacheco JM (2008) Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454(7205):213–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling T (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Scott SV, Orlikowski WJ (2012) Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 37(1):26–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen AK (1977) Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philos. Public Affairs 6(4):317–344.Google Scholar
  • Shah SK (2005) Open beyond software. Cooper D, DiBona C, Stone M, eds. Open Sources 2.0: The Continuing Evolution (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA), 339–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shen C, Monge P (2011) Who connects with whom? A social network analysis of an online open source software community. First Monday 16(6) http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3551/2991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1976) From substantive to procedural rationality. Latsis SJ, ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 129–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strandburg KJ (2009) Norms and the sharing of research materials and tacit knowledge. Dreyfuss RC, First H, Zimmerman DL, eds. Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property (Oxford University Press, New York), 85–110.Google Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependece: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything (Portfolio, New York).Google Scholar
  • Vollan B, Ostrom E (2010) Cooperation and the commons. Science 330(6006):923–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E (2005a) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E (2005b) Open source software projects as user innovation networks. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 267–78.Google Scholar
  • von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2003) Special issue on open source software development. Res. Policy 32(7):1149–1157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, Späth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):33–57.Google Scholar
  • Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weber S (2004) The Success of Open Source (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber JM, Murnighan JK (2008) Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(6):1340–1353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–205.Google Scholar
  • West J (2003) How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy 32(7):1259–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West J, Gallagher S (2006) Patterns of open innovation in open source software. Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J, eds. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 82–108.Google Scholar
  • Willer R, Flynn FJ, Zak S (2012) Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):119–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T, Kiyonari T (2000) The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63(2):116–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeitlyn D (2003) Gift economies in the development of open source software: Anthropological reflections. Res. Policy 32(7):1287–1291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zittrain J (2008) The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.