Deciding Who Will Rule: Examining the Influence of Outside Noncore Directors on Executive Entrenchment
References
- (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
- (2005) The costs of entrenched boards. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):409–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Bundling and entrenchment. Harvard Law Rev. 123(7):1549–1595.Google Scholar
- (1978) Business and society. Annual Rev. Sociol. 4:115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. J. Corporation Law 27(2):231–273.Google Scholar
- (2008) Corporate governance and firm performance. J. Corporate Finance 14(3):257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. Columbia Law Rev. 108(8):1803–1882.Google Scholar
- (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, London).Google Scholar
- (1996) Explaining variance in the performance of long-term corporate blockholders. Strategic Management J. 17(3):243–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. J. Financial Econom. 40(1):81–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The distant core: Social solidarity, social distance and interpersonal ties in core-periphery structures. Soc. Networks 23(4):245–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Role of chief executive officers in takeover resistance: Effects of CEO incentives and individual characteristics. Acad. Management J. 37(3):554–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1967) Stratification and risk-taking: A theory tested on agricultural innovation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(6):912–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Firm failure and managerial labor markets: Evidence from Texas banking. J. Financial Econom. 38(2):185–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Regression Analysis by Example (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2009) CEO compensation and board structure. J. Finance 64(1):231–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Golden parachute as a compensation-shifting mechanism. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 20(1):170–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23(3):70–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) New evidence on the market for directors: Board membership and Pennsylvania Senate Bill 1310. J. Finance 58(1):197–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Boards: Does one size fit all? J. Financial Econom. 87(2):329–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition-firm performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 44(8):1299–1323.Google Scholar
- (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 19(3):269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Top managerial prestige, power and tender offer response: A study of elite social networks and target firm cooperation during takeovers. Organ. Sci. 4(2):123–151.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):583–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) New directions in corporate governance. Annual Rev. Sociol. 31:143–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) A social movement perspective on corporate control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. 1(3):301–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. J. Finance 52(1):135–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1956) Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 53(1):100–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? J. Financial Econom. 97(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. J. Finance 58(3):1087–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Takeover defenses of IPO firms. J. Finance 57(5):1857–1889.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management J. 10(2):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):489–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) CEO outside directorships and firm performance: A reconciliation of agency and embeddedness views. Acad. Management J. 54(2):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. 100(3):468–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default. J. Financial Econom. 27(2):355–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Outside directors with a stake: The linchpin in improving governance. Calif. Management Rev. 42(4):108–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. J. Financial Econom. 69(1):51–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A theory of board control and size. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1797–1832.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Hay Group (2012) The Wall Street Journal/Hay Group CEO compensation study 2011. Report, Hay Group, Philadelphia. http://www.haygroup.com/ww/downloads/details.aspx?id=33830.Google Scholar
- (2010) How corporate governance changed from 1986 to 2010. Bloomberg Businessweek (November 16) http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/nov2010/ca2010118_316346.htm.Google Scholar
- (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? J. Management 28(6):747–763.Google Scholar
- (1986) From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(4):800–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Managerial entrenchment and payout policy. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 39(4):759–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. J. Econom. Perspect. 2(1):49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48(3):831–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. J. Management 22(3):409–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision. J. Financial Econom. 42(2):159–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Director interlocks and spillover effects of reputational penalties from financial reporting fraud. Acad. Management J. 51(3):537–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Board leadership structure and firm performance. Corporate Governance: Internat. Rev. 13(6):785–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) In director pay, one size fits many. Treasury Risk (August 15) http://www.treasuryandrisk.com/2012/08/15/in-director-pay-one-size-fits-many.Google Scholar
- (1994) The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(2):313–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management J. 29(4):363–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Golden parachutes, executive decision making, and shareholder wealth. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):179–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):616–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Corporate governance and acquirer returns. J. Finance 62(4):1851–1889.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) My brother’s keeper? How CEOs’ social identification with the corporate elite affects the provision of social support to fellow CEOs and the consequences for leader effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 54(4):661–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1960) Innovation, integration, and marginality: A survey of physicians. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(5):704–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):285–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1):40–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):87–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Board seat accumulation by executives: A shareholder’s perspective. J. Finance 60(4):2083–2123.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Corporate governance reforms: Fact or fiction? Corporate Governance 6(2):107–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations 48(8):845–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 16(2):85–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Inside directors, board effectiveness, and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 44(2):229–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. J. Financial Econom. 73(3):497–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Acad. Management Rev. 27(4):554–573.Google Scholar
- (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1055–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):263–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2011) Statement by SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro on proxy access litigation. Press release (September 6), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-179.htm.Google Scholar
- (2008) Fight or flight: Managing stigma in executive careers. Strategic Management J. 29(5):557–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. J. Financial Econom. 25(1):123–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- Spencer Stuart (2011) 2010 Spencer Stuart board index. Report, Spencer Stuart, London. http://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/SSBI2010.pdf.Google Scholar
- Spencer Stuart (2012) 2011 Spencer Stuart board index. Report, Spencer Stuart, London. http://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/SSBI_2011_final.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1996) Economic behavior in institutional environments: The corporate merger wave of the 1980s. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):699–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Do antitakeover provisions harm shareholders? J. Corporate Finance 16(4):487–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Corporate governance within the context of antitakeover provisions. Strategic Management J. 17(5):377–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Antitakeover provisions and shareholder value implications: A review and a contingency framework. J. Management 26(5):1005–1030.Google Scholar
- (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Management J. 30(3):405–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management J. 31(9):946–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Corporations and the corporate elite. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:41–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(2):199–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (1986) Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):184–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Golden parachutes: CEOs and the exercise of social influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):587–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The impact of TMT board member control and environment on post-IPO performance. Acad. Management J. 53(3):572–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Outside directors and CEO turnover. J. Financial Econom. 20(1–2):431–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Acad. Management J. 53(1):15–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):361–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U.S. companies. Acad. Management J. 50(2):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEO’s long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):161–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Leveraging the ties of others to build a reputation for trustworthiness among peers. Acad. Management J. 53(1):129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. J. Finance 59(5):2281–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(5):1197–1215.Google Scholar

