Deciding Who Will Rule: Examining the Influence of Outside Noncore Directors on Executive Entrenchment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0874

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Bebchuk L, Cohen A (2005) The costs of entrenched boards. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):409–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Kamar E (2010) Bundling and entrenchment. Harvard Law Rev. 123(7):1549–1595.Google Scholar
  • Berg I, Zald MN (1978) Business and society. Annual Rev. Sociol. 4:115–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhagat S, Black BS (2002) The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. J. Corporation Law 27(2):231–273.Google Scholar
  • Bhagat S, Bolton B (2008) Corporate governance and firm performance. J. Corporate Finance 14(3):257–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhagat S, Bolton B, Romano R (2008) The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. Columbia Law Rev. 108(8):1803–1882.Google Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, London).Google Scholar
  • Bogert JD (1996) Explaining variance in the performance of long-term corporate blockholders. Strategic Management J. 17(3):243–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Booth JR, Deli DN (1996) Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. J. Financial Econom. 40(1):81–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois M, Friedkin NE (2001) The distant core: Social solidarity, social distance and interpersonal ties in core-periphery structures. Soc. Networks 23(4):245–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchholtz AK, Ribbens BA (1994) Role of chief executive officers in takeover resistance: Effects of CEO incentives and individual characteristics. Acad. Management J. 37(3):554–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai J, Garner JL, Walkling RA (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cancian F (1967) Stratification and risk-taking: A theory tested on agricultural innovation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(6):912–927.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannella AAJ, Fraser DR, Lee S (1995) Firm failure and managerial labor markets: Evidence from Texas banking. J. Financial Econom. 38(2):185–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee S, Hadi AS, Price B (2000) Regression Analysis by Example (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2009) CEO compensation and board structure. J. Finance 64(1):231–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi A (2004) Golden parachute as a compensation-shifting mechanism. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 20(1):170–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung KH, Pruitt SW (1994) A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23(3):70–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coles JL, Hoi CK (2003) New evidence on the market for directors: Board membership and Pennsylvania Senate Bill 1310. J. Finance 58(1):197–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveenc L (2008) Boards: Does one size fit all? J. Financial Econom. 87(2):329–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Combs JG, Ketchen DJ, Perryman AA, Donahue MS (2007) The moderating effect of CEO power on the board composition-firm performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 44(8):1299–1323.Google Scholar
  • Dalton DR, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE, Johnson JL (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 19(3):269–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Aveni RA, Kesner IF (1993) Top managerial prestige, power and tender offer response: A study of elite social networks and target firm cooperation during takeovers. Organ. Sci. 4(2):123–151.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):583–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF (2005) New directions in corporate governance. Annual Rev. Sociol. 31:143–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Greve HR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Thompson TA (1994) A social movement perspective on corporate control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):141–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Yoo M, Baker WE (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. 1(3):301–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denis DJ, Denis DK, Sarin A (1997) Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. J. Finance 52(1):135–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dittes JE, Kelley HH (1956) Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 53(1):100–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fahlenbrach R, Low A, Stulz RM (2010) Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? J. Financial Econom. 97(1):12–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):288–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris SP, Jagannathan M, Pritchard AC (2003) Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. J. Finance 58(3):1087–1111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field LC, Karpoff JM (2002) Takeover defenses of IPO firms. J. Finance 57(5):1857–1889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1989) Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management J. 10(2):121–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes DP, Milliken FJ (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):489–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geletkanycz MA, Boyd BK (2011) CEO outside directorships and firm performance: A reconciliation of agency and embeddedness views. Acad. Management J. 54(2):335–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1992) Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. 100(3):468–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilson SC (1990) Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default. J. Financial Econom. 27(2):355–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P, Ishii J, Metrick A (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick DC, Jackson EM (2000) Outside directors with a stake: The linchpin in improving governance. Calif. Management Rev. 42(4):108–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harford J (2003) Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. J. Financial Econom. 69(1):51–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris M, Raviv A (2008) A theory of board control and size. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1797–1832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hay Group (2012) The Wall Street Journal/Hay Group CEO compensation study 2011. Report, Hay Group, Philadelphia. http://www.haygroup.com/ww/downloads/details.aspx?id=33830.Google Scholar
  • Hembrock Duam J (2010) How corporate governance changed from 1986 to 2010. Bloomberg Businessweek (November 16) http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/nov2010/ca2010118_316346.htm.Google Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Cannella AAJ, Harris IC (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? J. Management 28(6):747–763.Google Scholar
  • Hirsch PM (1986) From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(4):800–837.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu A, Kumar P (2004) Managerial entrenchment and payout policy. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 39(4):759–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrell GA, Brickley JA, Netter JM (1988) The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. J. Econom. Perspect. 2(1):49–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48(3):831–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson JL, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE (1996) Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. J. Management 22(3):409–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jung K, Kim Y-C, Stulz RM (1996) Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision. J. Financial Econom. 42(2):159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kang E (2008) Director interlocks and spillover effects of reputational penalties from financial reporting fraud. Acad. Management J. 51(3):537–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kang E, Zardkoohi A (2005) Board leadership structure and firm performance. Corporate Governance: Internat. Rev. 13(6):785–799.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly S (2012) In director pay, one size fits many. Treasury Risk (August 15) http://www.treasuryandrisk.com/2012/08/15/in-director-pay-one-size-fits-many.Google Scholar
  • Kollock P (1994) The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(2):313–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroll M, Walters BA, Wright P (2008) Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management J. 29(4):363–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert RA, Larcker DF (1985) Golden parachutes, executive decision making, and shareholder wealth. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):179–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EJ, Thye SR, Yoon J (2000) Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):616–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masulis RW, Wang C, Xie F (2007) Corporate governance and acquirer returns. J. Finance 62(4):1851–1889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2011) My brother’s keeper? How CEOs’ social identification with the corporate elite affects the provision of social support to fellow CEOs and the consequences for leader effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 54(4):661–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menzel H (1960) Innovation, integration, and marginality: A survey of physicians. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(5):704–713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1994) Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):285–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D (1983) Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1):40–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer D, Barber BM (2001) Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):87–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry T, Peyer U (2005) Board seat accumulation by executives: A shareholder’s perspective. J. Finance 60(4):2083–2123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petra ST (2006) Corporate governance reforms: Fact or fiction? Corporate Governance 6(2):107–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A, McNulty T (1995) Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations 48(8):845–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rediker KJ, Seth A (1995) Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 16(2):85–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenstein S, Wyatt JG (1997) Inside directors, board effectiveness, and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 44(2):229–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan HE Jr, Wiggins RA III (2004) Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. J. Financial Econom. 73(3):497–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan LV, Schneider M (2002) The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Acad. Management Rev. 27(4):554–573.Google Scholar
  • Sanders WG, Hambrick DC (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1055–1078.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneper WD, Guillén MF (2004) Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):263–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2011) Statement by SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro on proxy access litigation. Press release (September 6), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-179.htm.Google Scholar
  • Semadeni M, Cannella AAJ, Fraser DR, Lee DS (2008) Fight or flight: Managing stigma in executive careers. Strategic Management J. 29(5):557–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1989) Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. J. Financial Econom. 25(1):123–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Spencer Stuart (2011) 2010 Spencer Stuart board index. Report, Spencer Stuart, London. http://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/SSBI2010.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Spencer Stuart (2012) 2011 Spencer Stuart board index. Report, Spencer Stuart, London. http://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/SSBI_2011_final.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Stearns LB, Allan KD (1996) Economic behavior in institutional environments: The corporate merger wave of the 1980s. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):699–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:265–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stráska M, Waller G (2010) Do antitakeover provisions harm shareholders? J. Corporate Finance 16(4):487–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundaramurthy C (1996) Corporate governance within the context of antitakeover provisions. Strategic Management J. 17(5):377–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundaramurthy C (2000) Antitakeover provisions and shareholder value implications: A review and a contingency framework. J. Management 26(5):1005–1030.Google Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Callahan AL (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Management J. 30(3):405–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuggle CS, Sirmon DG, Reutzel CR, Bierman L (2010) Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management J. 31(9):946–968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M (1980) Corporations and the corporate elite. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:41–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M (1982) Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(2):199–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M (1984) The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Useem M, Karabel J (1986) Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):184–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade J, O’Reilly CA III, Chandratat I (1990) Golden parachutes: CEOs and the exercise of social influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):587–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walters BA, Kroll M, Wright P (2010) The impact of TMT board member control and environment on post-IPO performance. Acad. Management J. 53(3):572–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisbach MS (1988) Outside directors and CEO turnover. J. Financial Econom. 20(1–2):431–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Fredrickson JW (2001) Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 22(12):1113–1137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Graebner ME (2010) A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Acad. Management J. 53(1):15–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Khanna P (2003) Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):361–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Stern I (2007) Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U.S. companies. Acad. Management J. 50(2):267–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEO’s long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1997) Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):161–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong S-S, Boh WF (2010) Leveraging the ties of others to build a reputation for trustworthiness among peers. Acad. Management J. 53(1):129–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yermack D (2004) Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. J. Finance 59(5):2281–2308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zwiebel J (1996) Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(5):1197–1215.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.