Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0879

References

  • Alexander C (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Asch SE (1952) Social Psychology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacon G, Beckman S, Mowery D, Wilson E (1994) Managing product definition in high-technology industries: A pilot study. Calif. Management Rev. 36(3):32–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel CA, Garud R (2009) The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(1):107–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003a) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003b) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bijker WE (1997) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Boje DM (1991) The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(1): 106–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks FP (1995) The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, anniversary ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14(5):235–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Clark P, Staunton N (1989) Innovation in Technology and Organization (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Clemens ES (1993) Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women’s groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890–1920. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):755–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. 39(1):47–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D (2001) Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. 12(5): 612–631.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etzion D, Ferraro F (2010) The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1092–1107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewenstein B, Whyte J (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as “epistemic objects.” Organ. Stud. 30(1):7–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol CM (1989) A semiotic analysis of corporate language: Organizational boundaries and joint venturing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(2):277–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujimoto T, Iansiti M, Clark KB (1996) External integration in product development. Nishiguchi T, ed. Managing Product Development (Oxford University Press, New York), 121–161.Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harper & Row, London).Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4): 716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C, Heath D (2007) Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  • Heath C, Bell C, Steinberg E (2001) Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1028–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson K (1995) The political career of a prototype: Visual representation in design engineering. Soc. Problems 42(2):274–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski PA, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2012) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R, Allen TJ (1985) Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Acad. Management J. 28(1):67–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley T (2001) The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2011) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22(2):482–502.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynn GS, Morone JG, Paulson AS (1996) Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. Calif. Management Rev. 38(3):8–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A, Verganti R, Iansiti M (2001) Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. 47(1):133–150.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need: The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J (1982) Stories and scripts in organizational settings. Hastorf A, Isen A, eds. Cognitive Social Psychology (Elsevier, New York), 255–305.Google Scholar
  • Nicolini D, Mengis J, Swan J (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organ. Sci. 23(3):612–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Connor GC, Rice MP (2013) New market creation for breakthrough innovations: Enabling and constraining mechanisms. J. Product Innovation Management 30(2):209–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (1994) Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4):541–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr JE (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (ILR Press, Ithaca, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ortony A (1975) Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Ed. Theory 25(1):45–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ortony A (1993) Metaphor, language, and thought. Ortony A, ed. Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paivio A (1986) Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Petrie HG, Oshlag RS (1993) Metaphor and learning. Ortony A, ed. Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 579–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindova V, Dalpiaz E, Ravasi D (2011) A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organ. Sci. 22(2):413–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(Special issue):64–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schön DA (1993) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-solving in social policy. Ortony A, ed. Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK),137–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrage M (1999) Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Seidel VP (2007) Concept shifting and the radical product development process. J. Product Innovation Management 24(6):522–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane SA, Ulrich KT (2004) Technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in management science. Management Sci. 50(2):133–144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sillince J, Jarzabkowski P, Shaw D (2012) Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):630–650.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Snow DA, Rochford EB Jr, Worden SK, Benford RD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(4):464–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3):387–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigliani I, Ravasi D (2012) Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1232–1259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilly C (1993) Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Soc. Sci. Hist. 17(2):253–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M (2009) Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company.” Organ. Sci. 20(2):441–460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S (2008) The Innovation Journey (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1990) Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. Goodman PS, Sproull L, eds. Technology and Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 1–44.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective minds in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zeiss R, Groenewegen P (2009) Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement. Organization 16(1):81–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.