Constructing the Team: The Antecedents and Effects of Membership Model Divergence

References

• Alderfer CP (1977) Group and intergroup relations. Hackman JR, Suttle JL, eds. Improving the Quality of Work Life (Goodyear, Santa Monica, CA), 227–296.Google Scholar
• Alderfer CP (1980) Consulting to underbounded systems. Adv. Experiential Soc. Processes 2:267–295.Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Bresman H (2007) X-Teams: How to Build Teams That Lead, Innovate and Succeed (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992a) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992b) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3): 321–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1993) Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British J. Soc. Psych. 32(1):31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong DJ, Cole P (2002) Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Hinds P, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow HA, McGrath JE, Berdahl JL (2000) Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin JR (2003) Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):866–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema HG, Baum JAC, Mannix EA (2002) Management challenges in a new time. Acad. Management J. 45(5):916–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker JR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):408–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Kunda G (2004) Gurus, Hired Guns and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bavelas A (1950) Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 22(6):725–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Bonett D (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. 88(3):588–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Bertolotti F, Mattarelli E, Vignoli M, Macri DM (2012) Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technologies. Working paper, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen KL, Murnighan JK (1985) The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(3): 350–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandon DP, Hollingshead AB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. 15(6):633–645.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2013) The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1120–1139.Link, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Harasty AS (1996) Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM, eds. The Interpersonal Context (Guilford, New York), 347–370.Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 21(2):230–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1990) Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Annual Meeting Soc. Indust. Organ. Psych., Miami, FL.Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse SA (1993) Shared mental models in expert decision-making teams. Castellan NJJ, ed. Current Issues in Individual and Group Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 221–246.Google Scholar
• Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins R (1990) Stratification, emotional energy, and the transient emotions. Kemper TD, ed. Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions (State University of New York Press, Albany), 27–57.Google Scholar
• Collins R (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 12(3): 346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3): 352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN, Haas MR (2011) So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. J. Organ. Behav. 33(3):316–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curral LA, Forrester RH, Dawson JF, West MA (2001) It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 10(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Marks MA (2006) Leadership in multiteam systems. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR (2010a) The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR (2010b) Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res. Practice 14(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl M (1990) The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. Stroebe W, Hewstone M, eds. European Review of Social Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 263–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(2): 128–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2012) Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Ellis APJ (2006) System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Acad. Management J. 49(3):576–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falzon L (2000) Determining groups from the clique structure in large social networks. Soc. Networks 22(2):159–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Linville PW (1980) What does the schema concept buy us? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 6(4):543–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (2008) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston).Google Scholar
• George E, Chattopadhyay P (2005) One foot in each camp: The dual identification of contract workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(14):68–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Cohen SG (2003) Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Gibbs J (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):451–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2): 202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabher G (2002) Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Stud. 36(3):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray PH, Meister DB (2004) Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Sci. 50(6):821–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA, Dickson MW (1996) Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Rev. Psych. 47:307–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA, Salas E (1995) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, 1st ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Lorsch J, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1992) Group influences on individuals in organizations. Dunnette MD, Hough LM, Triandis HC, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed. (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), 1455–1525.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Katz N (2010) Group behavior and performance. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 1208–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Wageman R (2005) When and how team leaders matter. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:37–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ, Lickel B (1998) Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. Sedikides C, Schopler J, Insko CA, eds. Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 47–74.Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Beamish PW, Jackson SE, Mathieu JE (2007) Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1385–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobday M (2000) The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Res. Policy 29(7–8): 871–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2001) Social categorization and group behavior. Hogg MA, Tindale RS, eds. Group Processes (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 56–85.Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998) Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):659–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1080–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holyoak K (1984) Mental models in problem solving. Anderson JR, Kosslyn SM, eds. Tutorials in Learning and Memory: Essays in Honor of Gordon Bower (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco), 193–218.Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 89(1):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jussim L (1991) Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model. Psych. Rev. 98(1):54–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karau SJ, Williams KD (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(4):681–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? J. Management 20(2):403–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt DJ (1994) Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Carley KM, Prietula MJ, eds. Computational Organization Theory, Vol. 18 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 89–111.Google Scholar
• Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(6):822–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Sproull LS (2004) When team work means working on multiple teams: Examining the impact of multiple team memberships. Acad. Management Annual Meeting, New Orleans.Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4): 587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. 50(11):1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang DW, Moreland RL, Argote L (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lickel B, Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ (2001) Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(2):129–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lickel B, Hamilton DL, Wieczorkowska G, Lewis A, Sherman SJ, Uhles AN (2000) Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(2):223–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindkvist L (2004) Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. J. Management Governance 8(1):3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Carman R, Lott V (2001) Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25(2):229–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks M, Sabella M, Burke C, Zaccaro S (2002) The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 87(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Dechurch LA, Mathieu JE, Panzer FJ, Alonso A (2005) Teamwork in multiteam systems. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):964–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marrone JA, Tesluk PE, Carson JB (2007) A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1423–1439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Chen G (2011) The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. J. Management 37(2):610–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Marks MA, Zaccaro SJ (2001) Multiteam systems. Anderson N, Ones D, Sinangil HK, Viswesvaran C, eds. International Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 289–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin G, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matthews T, Whittaker S, Moran TP, Helsley SY, Judge TK (2011) Productive interrelationships between collaborative groups ease the challenges of dynamic and multi-teaming. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 21(4–5):371–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM (2000) Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5):473–492.Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Metiu A, Rothbard NP (2013) Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organ. Sci. 24(2):455–475.Link, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Ferzandi L, Hamilton K (2010) Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. J. Management 36(4):876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Myaskovsky L (2000) Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1): 117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. Brower AM, ed. What’s Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M (2013) The team unbound: Rethinking teams and boundedness amidst fluid, distributed and overlapping teams. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Hinds PJ (2002) Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 281–308.Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Woolley AW, O’Leary MB (2007) Conditions enabling effective multiple team membership. Crowston K, Sieber S, Wynn E, eds. Virtuality and Virtualization (Springer, Boston), 215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS (2011) Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 117(1):111–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Cummings JN (2007) The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(3):433–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Mortensen M (2010) Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. 21(1):115–131.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley AW (2011a) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):461–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Woolley AW, Mortensen M (2011b) Multiteam membership in relation to multiteam systems. Zaccaro SJ, Marks MA, DeChurch LA, eds. Multiteam Systems: An Organization Form for Dynamic and Complex Environments (Routledge, New York), 141–172.Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Hackman JR (2010) Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. J. Organ. Behav. 31(2–3):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panteli N, Davison RM (2005) The role of subgroups in the communication patterns of global virtual teams. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 48(2):191–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potter RE, Balthazard PA (2002) Virtual team interaction styles: Assessment and effects. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 56(4):423–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prencipe A, Tell F (2001) Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Res. Policy 30(9):1373–1394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J, Koole S, Solomon S (2010) Experimental existential psychology. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 724–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rentsch JR, Hall R (1994) Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. Beyerlein MM, Johnson DA, Beyerlin ST, eds. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Theories of Self-Managing Work Teams, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 223–261.Google Scholar
• Rentsch JR, Klimoski RJ (2001) Why do “great minds” think alike?: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2):107–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouse WB, Morris NM (1986) On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psych. Bull. 100(3):349–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouse WB, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1992) The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics 22(6):1296–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiller SZ, Mandviwalla M (2007) Virtual team research: An analysis of theory use and a framework for theory appropriation. Small Group Res. 38(1):12–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw ME, Robbin R, Belser JR (1981) Group Dynamics the Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1):67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Smith KA, Olian JD, Sims HPJ, O’Bannon DP, Scully JA (1994) Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):412–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch KA, Mathieu JE, Kraiger K (2005) Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. J. Appl. Psych. 90(3):523–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. 44(2):316–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Titus W (1985) Pooling of unshared information during group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(6):1467–1478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D (1990) Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. Amer. Psych. 45(2):120–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel S, ed. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Thiry M, Deguire M (2007) Recent developments in project-based organisations. Internat. J. Project Management 25(7):649–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas WI, Thomas DS (1928) The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs (A. A. Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Townsend AM, DeMarie SM, Hendrickson AR (1998) Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Acad. Management Executive 12(3):17–29.Google Scholar
• Tyler TR (1999) Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity based perspective. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21 (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 201–246.Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Goethals GR, ed. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Erber R, Raymond P (1991) Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(6):923–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top Management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. 35(1):91–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Raghuram S, Garud R (1999) Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ. Sci. 10(6):777–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum GM, Stasser G, Merry CJ (1996) Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 32(2):129–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaccaro SJ, Marks MA, DeChurch LA (2011) Multiteam Systems: An Organization Form for Dynamic and Complex Environments (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Zika-Viktorsson A, Sundstrom P, Engwall M (2006) Project overload: An exploratory study of work and management in multi-project settings. Internat. J. Project Management 24(5):385–394.Crossref, Google Scholar